Connect with us

AI Research

Meta’s Plan to Leap Ahead in the AI Race

Published

on


 


Why bother with artificial general intelligence (AGI)?

Why not just go straight to superintelligence (ASI)?

That’s precisely the message Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is sending with his latest organizational changes made in the last couple of days.

When most of us think of Meta, we think of it as a social media company. After all, Meta owns Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.

But Meta is actually a tech-centric advertising company. It derives almost 99% of its revenues from selling advertising space on its application platforms.

This is what turned Meta into a $1.78 trillion company sitting on $70 billion in cash and generating tens of billions in free cash flow every year. This year, Meta will generate $34.2 billion in free cash flow, which is actually significantly lower than last year’s $52 billion.

And there’s one reason for that… Its ambitions are far greater than advertising.

Skipping Over AGI

Meta is spending at record levels on both data center infrastructure and software development for artificial intelligence.

That’s what has directly impacted its free cash flows. And despite spending more than $100 billion on developing AI, Meta has been significantly behind companies like Google, Anthropic, and xAI in the race to artificial general intelligence.

For one of the largest, cash-rich, and most powerful tech companies, this has been a sore point for Meta that left analysts wondering what Meta might do to catch up.

Now we know.

A couple of weeks ago, Meta absolutely aped into a deal, spending $14.3 billion to acquire only 49% of Scale AI – a high-growth AI service company that focuses on data annotation and AI training data for companies looking to build AI models.

It’s an incredible figure that implies a $28.6 billion valuation for Scale AI – a company that was worth just $1 billion back in 2019.

But it was the deal structure that was telling.

Meta knew it couldn’t get away with an outright acquisition of Scale AI. Scale AI was a neutral party and a critical service provider to the industry. An all-out acquisition would have almost certainly caused major antitrust issues. I doubt the deal would have gone through.

So Zuckerberg acquired 49% to avoid antitrust problems. But the key part of the deal was that Scale AI’s CEO Alexandr Wang will leave Scale AI and join Meta as its Chief AI Officer.

Then, just a couple days ago, we learned that Zuckerberg has established a new division of Meta now known as Meta Superintelligence Labs (MSL) to be led by Wang.

The name says it all…

Meta knows it has fallen behind in the race to AGI. So it’s stepping up to put a team together to develop the next frontier AI model, something beyond AGI.

Meta is gearing up to build an artificial superintelligence.

But don’t take my word for it, here it is directly from Zuckerberg:

As the pace of AI progress accelerates, developing superintelligence is coming into sight. I believe this will be the beginning of a new era for humanity, and I am fully committed to doing what it takes for Meta to lead the way.

And he was clear about why he believes Meta can do it:

Meta is uniquely positioned to deliver superintelligence to the world. We have a strong business that supports building out significantly more compute than smaller labs. We have deeper experience building and growing products that reach billions of people.

And there is no question that Meta is pulling out all the stops and spending whatever it takes to put together a team that might be able to pull it off.

In addition to Zuckerberg’s “acquihire” of Alexandr Wang for $14.3 billion, he also pulled in Nat Friedman from Microsoft, who himself was “acquihired” by Microsoft for $7.5 billion in 2018 when Microsoft acquired GitHub.

Friedman will be helping to lead the new Meta Superintelligence Labs with Wang.

And that’s just two names. Here’s who else is joining Meta to hopefully achieve its ASI ambitions:

  • Seven key software engineers who have created various parts of OpenAI’s frontier models.
  • A key engineer at Anthropic.
  • Three key players from Google, two of whom come from Google’s DeepMind subsidiary.

And I’m sure there are far more in the works.

But what comes next might be hard to believe.

All in on ASI

For the very top talent, Meta is offering packages as high as $300 million over four years and more than $100 million in payouts in the first year. Other team members, like those I listed above, are rumored to be receiving packages around $10 million a year (base, bonus, and equity combined).

Never in my decades in high tech have I ever seen executive recruiting at this level.

Anyone who has actually built a frontier model, or any leading AI company, is invaluable in this environment. And these kinds of comp packages are only possible because a handful of companies out there have so much capital available to them that they can afford these astronomical packages.

But let’s not let these extraordinary compensation packages distract us from the far bigger story.

“Developing superintelligence is coming into sight.”

Many in the industry are starting to believe that artificial general intelligence is now becoming a near-term event. This is a prediction that I’ve made for quite some time. We’re already seeing sprouts of AGI.

Something very big is right around the corner, and I predict that xAI’s Grok 4 – which is expected to be released shortly after July 4 – is going to leap far ahead of the rest of the industry. Many will suggest that Grok 4 is an early version of AGI.

We’re so close…

Which is why Meta isn’t setting its target on such an imminent technology. It is assembling a team to build, and hopefully lead, what’s coming next…

… namely, artificial superintelligence.

Jeff


Want more stories like this one?

The Bleeding Edge is the only free newsletter that delivers daily insights and information from the high-tech world as well as topics and trends relevant to investments.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AI Research

The new frontier of medical malpractice

Published

on


Although the beginnings of modern artificial intelligence (AI) can be traced
as far back as 1956, modern generative AI, the most famous example of which is
arguably ChatGPT, only began emerging in 2019. For better or worse, the steady
rise of generative AI has increasingly impacted the medical field. At this time, AI has begun to advance in a way that creates
potential liability…



Source link

Continue Reading

AI Research

Radiomics-Based Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Approach for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Systematic Review – Cureus

Published

on



Radiomics-Based Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Approach for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Systematic Review  Cureus



Source link

Continue Reading

AI Research

A Real-Time Look at How AI Is Reshaping Work : Information Sciences Institute

Published

on


Artificial intelligence may take over some tasks and transform others, but one thing is certain: it’s reshaping the job market. Researchers at USC’s Information Sciences Institute (ISI) analyzed LinkedIn job postings and AI-related patent filings to measure which jobs are most exposed, and where those changes are happening first. 

The project was led by ISI research assistant Eun Cheol Choi, working with students in a graduate-level USC Annenberg data science course taught by USC Viterbi Research Assistant Professor Luca Luceri. The team developed an “AI exposure” score to measure how closely each role is tied to current AI technologies. A high score suggests the job may be affected by automation, new tools, or shifts in how the work is done. 

Which Industries Are Most Exposed to AI?

To understand how exposure shifted with new waves of innovation, the researchers compared patent data from before and after a major turning point. “We split the patent dataset into two parts, pre- and post-ChatGPT release, to see how job exposure scores changed in relation to fresh innovations,” Choi said. Released in late 2022, ChatGPT triggered a surge in generative AI development, investment, and patent filings.

Jobs in wholesale trade, transportation and warehousing, information, and manufacturing topped the list in both periods. Retail also showed high exposure early on, while healthcare and social assistance rose sharply after ChatGPT, likely due to new AI tools aimed at diagnostics, medical records, and clinical decision-making.

In contrast, education and real estate consistently showed low exposure, suggesting they are, at least for now, less likely to be reshaped by current AI technologies.

AI’s Reach Depends on the Role

AI exposure doesn’t just vary by industry, it also depends on the specific type of work. Jobs like software engineer and data scientist scored highest, since they involve building or deploying AI systems. Roles in manufacturing and repair, such as maintenance technician, also showed elevated exposure due to increased use of AI in automation and diagnostics.

At the other end of the spectrum, jobs like tax accountant, HR coordinator, and paralegal showed low exposure. They center on work that’s harder for AI to automate: nuanced reasoning, domain expertise, or dealing with people.

AI Exposure and Salary Don’t Always Move Together

The study also examined how AI exposure relates to pay. In general, jobs with higher exposure to current AI technologies were associated with higher salaries, likely reflecting the demand for new AI skills. That trend was strongest in the information sector, where software and data-related roles were both highly exposed and well compensated.

But in sectors like wholesale trade and transportation and warehousing, the opposite was true. Jobs with higher exposure in these industries tended to offer lower salaries, especially at the highest exposure levels. The researchers suggest this may signal the early effects of automation, where AI is starting to replace workers instead of augmenting them.

“In some industries, there may be synergy between workers and AI,” said Choi. “In others, it may point to competition or replacement.”

From Class Project to Ongoing Research

The contrast between industries where AI complements workers and those where it may replace them is something the team plans to investigate further. They hope to build on their framework by distinguishing between different types of impact — automation versus augmentation — and by tracking the emergence of new job categories driven by AI. “This kind of framework is exciting,” said Choi, “because it lets us capture those signals in real time.”

Luceri emphasized the value of hands-on research in the classroom: “It’s important to give students the chance to work on relevant and impactful problems where they can apply the theoretical tools they’ve learned to real-world data and questions,” he said. The paper, Mapping Labor Market Vulnerability in the Age of AI: Evidence from Job Postings and Patent Data, was co-authored by students Qingyu Cao, Qi Guan, Shengzhu Peng, and Po-Yuan Chen, and was presented at the 2025 International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), held June 23-26 in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Published on July 7th, 2025

Last updated on July 7th, 2025



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending