Connect with us

AI Research

UK banks brace for losses on loans to broadband challengers

Published

on


Stay informed with free updates

NatWest and Lloyds are among the big banks braced for losses on billions of pounds in loans to troubled UK broadband providers, as the weakest players in the nascent fibre sector battle mounting financial pressure.

Dozens of “altnets” — alternative network providers — have tried to challenge the dominance of BT’s Openreach and Virgin Media O2 but many are struggling to attract enough customers to meet the costs of their network rollout and have been hit by higher interest rates.

Lloyds Banking Group said last month that its commercial banking unit had set aside £25mn to cover loans that were unlikely to be repaid in full. Its chief financial officer, William Chalmers, said these provisions were largely isolated to loans for the fibre sector.

Chalmers said the sector had suffered “bumps in the road” because of “higher construction costs” and “lower subscriber numbers than people had originally anticipated”.

NatWest was among the banks most exposed to altnets, said four people familiar with the matter, two of whom estimated that the bank had lent about £1bn to the struggling sector.

NatWest has taken provisions in relation to its loans to the fibre sector, said a person close to the bank. Its commercial and institutional division reported a £76mn impairment in its second-quarter results, which the person said included expected losses on loans to altnets.

The bank did not have any significant concerns about its credit portfolio, they added.

Creditors are holding talks with several altnets over how they will repay substantial debts they accumulated to fund the construction of fibre optic networks.

Gigaclear, an altnet serving more than 600,000 homes in mainly rural communities, is in negotiations with lenders — including Lloyds, NatWest and HSBC — over how to solve a funding shortfall, according to two people familiar with the matter.

In 2023, the year it secured a £1bn debt package, Gigaclear generated just £34mn of revenue. One person involved in the talks said the banks could end up swapping debt for equity or extending Gigaclear’s credit facility. Gigaclear’s shareholders might also inject more cash, the person said.

Gigaclear said its stakeholders remained supportive. “We continue to work constructively with them to explore a range of options that support the long-term success of Gigaclear and deliver the best outcome for all parties,” it said.

Another altnet, London-based G.Network, is searching for a buyer after accumulating £386mn of debt, against revenues of £10mn last year. G.Network declined to comment.

The issues in the sector are also set to affect the state-backed National Wealth Fund, which has committed £1.1bn for lending to altnets in recent years. The NWF has also offered indemnities to lenders on some riskier loans to the sector to encourage investment, according to two people familiar with the matter.

The fund said that ensuring good internet connectivity across the UK was “key to [economic] growth — an essential part of the NWF’s mission”.

“We only commit capital where we are needed and, in the case of altnets, where market appetite is restricted, we have worked to crowd in commercial investors to help meet the government’s Gigabit ambitions,” the NWF added.

Dozens of lenders — including Société Générale and ABN AMRO — loaned billions to altnets after industry regulator Ofcom launched a plan to encourage competition in the UK broadband market.

As a result the UK now has about 75 broadband providers, according to comparison site ThinkBroadband. The intense competition has driven down prices and returns in an industry with high upfront costs.

Karen Egan, head of telecoms at Enders Analysis, said writedowns in this sector had been “inevitable for some time”. Enders calculates altnets are collectively carrying more than £7bn of net debt.

“The interest bill [for these companies] . . . is even higher than their revenue bases in many instances,” Egan added.

Lloyds, NatWest, ING, ABN Amro and HSBC declined to comment.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AI Research

NVIDIA AI Releases Universal Deep Research (UDR): A Prototype Framework for Scalable and Auditable Deep Research Agents

Published

on


Why do existing deep research tools fall short?

Deep Research Tools (DRTs) like Gemini Deep Research, Perplexity, OpenAI’s Deep Research, and Grok DeepSearch rely on rigid workflows bound to a fixed LLM. While effective, they impose strict limitations: users cannot define custom strategies, swap models, or enforce domain-specific protocols.

NVIDIA’s analysis identifies three core problems:

  • Users cannot enforce preferred sources, validation rules, or cost control.
  • Specialized research strategies for domains such as finance, law, or healthcare are unsupported.
  • DRTs are tied to single models, preventing flexible pairing of the best LLM with the best strategy.

These issues restrict adoption in high-value enterprise and scientific applications.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.00244

What is Universal Deep Research (UDR)?

Universal Deep Research (UDR) is an open-source system (in preview) that decouples strategy from model. It allows users to design, edit, and run their own deep research workflows without retraining or fine-tuning any LLM.

Unlike existing tools, UDR works at the system orchestration level:

  • It converts user-defined research strategies into executable code.
  • It runs workflows in a sandboxed environment for safety.
  • It treats the LLM as a utility for localized reasoning (summarization, ranking, extraction) instead of giving it full control.

This architecture makes UDR lightweight, flexible, and model-agnostic.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.00244

How does UDR process and execute research strategies?

UDR takes two inputs: the research strategy (step-by-step workflow) and the research prompt (topic and output requirements).

  1. Strategy Processing
    • Natural language strategies are compiled into Python code with enforced structure.
    • Variables store intermediate results, avoiding context-window overflow.
    • All functions are deterministic and transparent.
  2. Strategy Execution
    • Control logic runs on CPU; only reasoning tasks call the LLM.
    • Notifications are emitted via yield statements, keeping users updated in real time.
    • Reports are assembled from stored variable states, ensuring traceability.

This separation of orchestration vs. reasoning improves efficiency and reduces GPU cost.

What example strategies are available?

NVIDIA ships UDR with three template strategies:

  • Minimal – Generate a few search queries, gather results, and compile a concise report.
  • Expansive – Explore multiple topics in parallel for broader coverage.
  • Intensive – Iteratively refine queries using evolving subcontexts, ideal for deep dives.

These serve as starting points, but the framework allows users to encode entirely custom workflows.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.00244

What outputs does UDR generate?

UDR produces two key outputs:

  • Structured Notifications – Progress updates (with type, timestamp, and description) for transparency.
  • Final Report – A Markdown-formatted research document, complete with sections, tables, and references.

This design gives users both auditability and reproducibility, unlike opaque agentic systems.

Where can UDR be applied?

UDR’s general-purpose design makes it adaptable across domains:

  • Scientific discovery: structured literature reviews.
  • Enterprise due diligence: validation against filings and datasets.
  • Business intelligence: market analysis pipelines.
  • Startups: custom assistants built without retraining LLMs.

By separating model choice from research logic, UDR supports innovation in both dimensions.

Summary

Universal Deep Research signals a shift from model-centric to system-centric AI agents. By giving users direct control over workflows, NVIDIA enables customizable, efficient, and auditable research systems.

For startups and enterprises, UDR provides a foundation for building domain-specific assistants without the cost of model retraining—opening new opportunities for innovation across industries.


Check out the PAPER, PROJECT and CODE. Feel free to check out our GitHub Page for Tutorials, Codes and Notebooks. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 100k+ ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter.


Asif Razzaq is the CEO of Marktechpost Media Inc.. As a visionary entrepreneur and engineer, Asif is committed to harnessing the potential of Artificial Intelligence for social good. His most recent endeavor is the launch of an Artificial Intelligence Media Platform, Marktechpost, which stands out for its in-depth coverage of machine learning and deep learning news that is both technically sound and easily understandable by a wide audience. The platform boasts of over 2 million monthly views, illustrating its popularity among audiences.



Source link

Continue Reading

AI Research

GAO Review Finds 94 Federal AI Adoption Requirements

Published

on





GAO Review Finds 94 Federal AI Adoption Requirements













































Go toTop







Source link

Continue Reading

AI Research

South Korea Looks to Canadian Energy to Fuel its AI Ambitions

Published

on


Artificial intelligence (AI) and clean energy technologies have emerged as central policy pillars of the new Lee Jae Myung government in South Korea, as part of his administration’s strategy to revitalize the economy.

Recognizing that the country has lagged behind global leaders such as the U.S. and China, both of which have adopted robust industrial policies, Lee’s government plans to introduce a South Korean version of the Inflation Reduction Act, a massive government investment plan to promote key strategic sectors. Similar to the U.S. act, Lee’s initiative aims to provide large-scale subsidies and targeted government financing to accelerate growth in strategic sectors, with AI and clean energy at the forefront.

Within this broader policy shift, the nexus between AI and energy has gained prominence. The rapid scaling up of energy-intensive AI infrastructure has sent energy demand soaring. As a result, South Korea needs to ensure a sustainable and resilient power supply for the digital economy. South Korea is one of the countries leading efforts to integrate energy policy and AI strategy in a way that both promotes innovation and strengthens energy security.

The evolution of South Korea’s AI governance

South Korea laid a foundation for AI governance in its 2024 Framework Act on Artificial Intelligence, one of the world’s first comprehensive national AI laws. Enacted under Lee’s predecessor, Yoon Suk Yeol, the act was designed to foster innovation while ensuring transparency, safety, and public accountability.

Shortly after assuming the presidency in early June, Lee elevated AI to a central role in South Korea’s national growth agenda. His administration’s blueprint aims to position the country among the world’s top three AI powers. Adopting a ‘develop-first, regulate-later’ philosophy, the plan emphasizes ecosystem expansion, including C$97 billion (100 trillion South Korean won) in AI investments, the designation of data centres as critical infrastructure, and the rollout of an “AI Highway” to connect regional tech clusters. Simultaneously, the administration is continuing to build on the AI Framework Act, working to implement its provisions early in Lee’s five-year term to ensure legal stability and time to build public trust, particularly around issues such as data privacy and algorithmic bias.

A notable feature of this approach is integrating the country’s tech-sector leaders into policy roles. For example, the head of Naver’s AI Center was appointed presidential secretary for AI policy, and the president of LG AI Research now serves as minister of science and Information and Communications Technology. In addition, a centralized AI governance body within the presidential office now co-ordinates interministerial initiatives and accelerates regulatory reforms in close dialogue with the private sector. 

To ensure that the strategy is well resourced, the government has earmarked C$970 million (1 trillion won) in public investment for AI research and development (R&D), in addition to a C$330-billion (340 trillion won) investment in three ‘game-changing’ technologies: AI semiconductors, advanced biotechnology, and quantum technology. Additionally, a national AI computing centre, costing C$2 billion (2 trillion won), is expected to open by 2027. These developments reflect a national effort to accelerate AI innovation to give South Korea the upper hand in technologies that are indispensable within the global value chain. 

Key challenges in the AI–energy nexus

As South Korea pushes forward with its AI agenda, one of its most pressing challenges is building a sufficient and reliable energy supply. The explosive growth of AI infrastructure is substantially increasing demand on South Korea’s energy grid, with wide-ranging implications for both industrial competitiveness and climate goals.

The expansion of AI computing, especially through hyperscale data centres, is driving this steep growth in demand. A landmark 3 gigawatt data centre project in Jeollanam-do Province is expected to go online by 2028 to accommodate the compute intensity of next-generation AI applications. National electricity demand is projected to double by 2030 relative to 2022 levels, driven largely by data centres and semiconductor fabrication plants — two sectors at the heart of South Korea’s digital strategy.

Already, the country’s aging power grid is struggling to keep pace with this growth. Approximately 78 per cent of existing data centre power use is concentrated in the Seoul metropolitan area, straining the city’s local infrastructure. Although the government has pushed to relocate the data centre to other provinces through the Special Act on Distributed Energy (which came into effect in June 2024), to date, no such news of this relocation has been reported. Experts warn that without rapid modernization, grid bottlenecks could compromise supply stability and industrial growth. In response, the government enacted the Power Grid Act in February 2025 to expedite grid expansion, including provisions for enhanced compensation to communities affected by new transmission lines. The act also encourages public-private investment and regulatory reforms to streamline power purchase agreements and other procedures related to utilities.

To support its expanding AI infrastructure and meet AI-driven energy demands, South Korea is turning to liquefied natural gas (LNG) and nuclear power as its main sources of reliable electricity. Plans are underway to convert 28 aging coal-fired plants to run on LNG and to build two new nuclear reactors by 2038, supplementing the four already under construction. In contrast to former president Moon Jae-in’s (2017-22) nuclear phase-out policy, recent developments — including a speech by Lee during the recent election campaign and the appointment of Kim Jeong-gwan, president of Doosan Enerbility (a major national conglomerate deeply engaged in nuclear energy development), as minister of trade, industry and energy — suggest that the current administration recognizes the challenges of relying solely on renewables and the necessity of re-introducing nuclear energy. These signals indicate a pragmatic approach to building a renewables-centred energy system while maintaining energy security.

In the same vein, Seoul also sees small modular reactors (SMRs) as a promising long-term solution for powering AI infrastructure and carbon neutrality. The first 0.7-gigawatt SMR is expected to be deployed by 2036. Meanwhile, Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP), one of the Korea Electric Power Corporation’s subsidiaries operating nuclear and hydroelectric plants, is advancing its innovative SMR design, aiming to finalize the standard design by the end of 2025. SMRs are increasingly favoured as a go-to solution to meet soaring AI-driven energy demand, not just in South Korea but elsewhere. For example, large tech companies such as Amazon and Google have pledged to increase their nuclear-power capacity by 2050, paying particular attention to SMRs for their potential to provide localized, carbon-free power generation for data centre clusters and industrial complexes. 

Canada–South Korea co-operation: a strategic convergence

No country can achieve the dual goals of securing sustainable energy and fuelling the AI boom on its own. As South Korea bolsters its AI-energy strategy, cross-border collaboration will become indispensable. Canada has emerged as a key partner in this space.

Stable access to critical minerals and nuclear fuel is essential to South Korea’s energy security and growing AI infrastructure. In 2024, 48 per cent of the country’s enriched uranium imports (by value) came from Russia. However, amid heightened geopolitical risk, South Korea is shifting to more secure suppliers. Canada, the world’s second-largest supplier, with an 18 per cent global share in 2024, is expected to play an increasingly vital role. This diversification strategy not only reduces South Korea’s dependence on Russia but also boosts the long-term sustainability of its nuclear power fleet.

Nuclear technology and fuel have long been central to Canada–South Korea technology co-operation. Canada’s CANDU heavy-water reactors form a key part of South Korea’s nuclear infrastructure, with four CANDU reactors currently in operation at Wolsong. The bilateral nuclear co-operation has been well exemplified in the recent memoranda. In 2023, the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Alberta’s provincial government to explore deploying the South Korea-designed SMART SMRs in Alberta, targeting applications such as oil sand steam generation. In the same year, KAERI and Canada’s Atomic Energy of Canada Limited signed a nuclear R&D MOU focusing on placing South Korean SMR designs into global markets, with an emphasis on collaboration with Canada. In May 2024, KHNP, Canada’s SMR developer, ARC Clean Technology, and New Brunswick Power signed trilateral agreement to co-develop and deploy the ARC-100 advanced SMR, including mass deployment plans, starting with a demonstration at Point Lepreau, New Brunswick.

Bilateral AI collaboration is also in the works. In June 2024the National Research Council of Canada and South Korea’s National Research Council of Science and Technology renewed their MOU, reaffirming joint R&D co-operation in AI and digital technologies. The agreement supports exchanges of researchers, joint innovation projects, and the development of collaborative infrastructure.

Finally, ethical AI governance — specifically South Korea’s AI Framework Act — can serve as a valuable reference point for Canada as it develops its own regulatory framework. Both countries emphasize transparency, safety, and accountability in AI, and their joint participation in forums such as the OECD and the Global Partnership on AI offers meaningful avenues for co-ordination. Collaborative efforts in this space would not only promote responsible innovation but also contribute to shaping global norms grounded in democratic values.

As South Korea accelerates its AI ambitions, the question of energy resilience has become inseparable from digital innovation. The AI-energy nexus is now a strategic domain where governance, infrastructure, and international partnerships converge. Canada, with its deep expertise in nuclear technology and growing AI ecosystem, is uniquely positioned to collaborate with South Korea in building a secure, ethical, and sustainable digital future.
 

• Edited by Jeehye Kim, Senior Program Manager, Northeast Asia, Vina Nadjibulla, Vice-President Research & Strategy, and Ted Fraser, Senior Editor, APF Canada 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending