Education
Is Using AI Cheating? How to Use It Responsibly for School (By: Streak Ranker)
The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools has ignited a global discourse within educational institutions, prompting a re-evaluation of academic integrity. The fundamental question—”Is using AI cheating?”—does not have a simple yes or no answer. Instead, it’s a nuanced issue that depends heavily on the context, the specific AI tool, and, most critically, the intent and manner of its use by students. The consensus among educators and experts is that AI is not inherently cheating, but rather becomes so when it is employed to gain an unfair advantage, misrepresent one’s own knowledge, or bypass the essential cognitive processes of learning.
Key Insights into AI and Academic Integrity
AI is not inherently cheating: The ethical use of AI hinges on the how—whether it supports learning or circumvents personal effort and understanding.
Transparency and disclosure are paramount: Students should always be upfront about AI use, citing it properly, and adhering to institutional policies.
AI as a learning enhancer: When used for brainstorming, proofreading, or idea generation, AI can be a powerful tool that augments, rather than replaces, critical thinking and original work.
Understanding Academic Dishonesty in the Age of AI
Academic dishonesty is broadly defined as any action that allows a student to gain an unfair advantage or to misrepresent their true knowledge or effort. When applying this definition to AI, certain uses clearly fall into the realm of cheating, while others serve as legitimate learning aids. The distinction lies in whether the AI is performing the core intellectual work for the student or merely assisting them in their own intellectual endeavor.
The Fine Line: When AI Becomes Cheating
Using AI becomes cheating when it replaces a student’s original thought, research, and writing without proper acknowledgment or when it’s used to generate entire assignments that are then submitted as one’s own work. This includes:
Submitting AI-generated content as original: If a student uses an AI tool to write an essay, a report, or answers to exam questions and presents it as their own, this is considered academic dishonesty. Institutions like Penn Foster and the University of Maryland explicitly state that using AI to generate parts or all of an assignment without citation is cheating.
Bypassing personal effort: Relying on AI to complete assignments without understanding the underlying concepts or contributing personal intellectual effort undermines the entire purpose of education. The goal of schoolwork is to develop critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and knowledge retention, which are all circumvented by such misuse of AI.
Gaining an unfair advantage: If a student uses AI in a high-stakes assessment where others are not, or where its use is explicitly forbidden, it creates an unfair competitive environment.
Despite fears of a massive surge in cheating since the introduction of AI, research indicates that the reasons students cheat are often unrelated to technology access. However, AI’s capabilities can amplify existing dishonest behaviors, making it easier for some students to produce seemingly polished work quickly, thereby intensifying concerns about academic integrity.
Visual representation of student engagement with AI tools in educational settings.
How to Harness AI Responsibly for Academic Success
When used ethically and transparently, AI tools can be invaluable assets that enhance learning, improve productivity, and foster critical thinking. The key is to leverage AI as a sophisticated learning aid, not a substitute for genuine intellectual engagement.
Core Principles for Responsible AI Use
Understand and Adhere to School Policies: Educational institutions are rapidly developing and updating their guidelines on AI usage. It is imperative for students to familiarize themselves with these policies. Many schools now expect explicit disclosure of AI assistance.
Transparency and Citation: Always be transparent about how and when AI tools were used. If AI assisted in brainstorming, outlining, or refining text, acknowledge it. This aligns with academic practices of citing all sources of information and assistance. For example, a citation might state: “Content generated with assistance from AI tool [name], and verified/edited by the author.”
AI as a Learning Aid, Not a Shortcut: AI should support your learning process, not replace it. Use AI for tasks such as:
Brainstorming and Idea Generation: AI can help kickstart the ideation process for essays or projects.
Grammar and Style Checks: Tools like Grammarly or AI-powered editors can help improve writing mechanics and clarity.
Summarizing Complex Texts: AI can condense lengthy articles or research papers, but students must still critically evaluate and verify the summarized content.
Concept Clarification: AI can explain difficult concepts or provide different perspectives, similar to a tutor.
Research Support: AI can help organize research materials or identify key themes.
Critically Evaluate AI Output: AI models can sometimes produce inaccurate, biased, or incomplete information. Always review, verify, and cross-reference AI-generated content with credible sources. This practice not only ensures accuracy but also develops essential critical thinking skills.
Maintain Personal Contribution and Understanding: The final work must reflect your own understanding, voice, and critical thought. Integrate AI outputs with your unique insights and ensure you can articulate and defend the content as your own.
Engage in Ethical Reflection: Beyond policies, understand the moral principles behind academic integrity. Ethical AI use contributes to your intellectual and moral development, fostering a culture of trust and honesty.
AI tools can be effectively integrated into classroom settings to support learning.
The Educator’s Role in Fostering AI Literacy and Integrity
Educators play a crucial role in guiding students toward responsible AI use. This involves:
Demystifying AI: Explaining how AI gathers and processes data helps students understand its capabilities and limitations.
Developing Clear Policies: Institutions must establish unambiguous guidelines regarding acceptable and unacceptable AI use.
Promoting AI Literacy: Equipping students with the knowledge and skills to understand, use, and develop AI systems ethically is paramount. Frameworks like PROMPT (Purpose, Role, Organization, Modeling, Parameters, Tweaking) for AI use and EDIT (Evaluate, Determine, Identify, Transform) for evaluating outputs can be beneficial.
Emphasizing Human Oversight: Reinforcing that human oversight and decision-making remain essential, even when AI is involved, promotes accountability.
Comparative Analysis of AI Use in Academia
To better understand the multifaceted aspects of AI integration in educational settings, let’s look at a comparative analysis of different aspects related to academic integrity and responsible AI use. The following radar chart illustrates key considerations for both students and educators.
This radar chart visually represents the perceived importance of different aspects of AI use from both student and educator perspectives, on a scale of 1 to 5. For example, “Personal Effort” is highly prioritized by educators, while “Critical Evaluation” of AI output is crucial for both groups. This highlights areas of consensus and potential areas for increased focus in AI literacy programs.
Understanding the Impact of AI on Learning Behaviors
The integration of AI into educational practices introduces new dynamics to student learning behaviors. While it offers unprecedented opportunities for enhanced learning, it also presents challenges related to dependence and critical thinking. The bar chart below illustrates hypothetical scores (out of 10) representing the impact of AI on various learning aspects.
The Ethical Compass for AI in Education
Navigating the ethical landscape of AI in education requires a clear understanding of principles that ensure fairness, accountability, and the genuine advancement of learning. The following mindmap visually organizes the key ethical considerations and responsible practices for integrating AI into academic environments.
Conclusion
The integration of AI into educational settings marks a transformative period, presenting both profound opportunities and significant ethical challenges. The question of “Is using AI cheating?” unequivocally depends on the manner and intent behind its application. When AI tools are used to circumvent personal effort, misrepresent one’s own knowledge, or gain an unfair advantage, they cross the line into academic dishonesty. However, when employed transparently as aids for brainstorming, research, writing enhancement, or conceptual clarification, AI can profoundly enrich the learning experience, fostering critical thinking and efficiency.
Ultimately, upholding academic integrity in the AI era requires a collaborative effort from students and educators alike. Students must commit to transparency, critically evaluate AI outputs, and ensure their work genuinely reflects their own intellectual engagement. Educators, in turn, must develop clear policies, cultivate AI literacy, and foster a culture where ethical reflection and genuine learning are prioritized over mere rule enforcement. By embracing AI responsibly, education can evolve to empower students with the tools and skills necessary to thrive in an increasingly AI-integrated world, without compromising the fundamental values of integrity and intellectual growth.
Education
Teachers see online learning as critical for workforce readiness in 2025
Key points:
In an era where workforce demands and the needs of high school learners are rapidly evolving, a new survey by Penn Foster Group sheds light on how teachers are reimagining education to better equip students for success.
Conducted at the start of the year, the survey of over 300 high school teachers underscores the growing need for educators to offer career-focused learning content and alternative high school pathways that equip students with workforce-ready skills in flexible ways beyond traditional schooling.
Teachers overwhelmingly reported a surge in interest among students to enter the workforce directly after graduation, with nearly 70 percent noting this trend had increased significantly in the past five years. This shift reflects a broader move toward practical, skills-based learning, as more than half of respondents (54 percent) shared plans to center their curricula around real-world skills. One teacher captured the essence of this approach, stating, “Students want to see how what they’re learning connects to their future. Showing them real-world applications keeps them engaged and motivated.”
By incorporating skills-based learning into their curricula, educators are equipping students with the tools necessary to transition seamlessly into the workforce after graduation–and online education is poised to play a pivotal role in this evolution. Nearly three-quarters of the teachers surveyed predict a rise in demand for online learning programs, with 70 percent agreeing that such programs are essential to workforce preparation. Educators pointed to flexibility and accessibility as key benefits, enabling students to balance education with other responsibilities while building critical skills for future careers.
The data in the survey also revealed that cost, faster completion times, and alignment with job opportunities are driving students toward nontraditional pathways. With 64 percent of educators expressing confidence in online learning as a viable alternative to traditional schooling, the shift toward digital and skills-based education is expected to continue accelerating, especially as high school learners are seeking more options for flexibility in their environment.
“As the educational landscape continues to evolve, it’s clear that traditional pathways are no longer enough to meet the diverse needs of today’s students,” said Andy Shean, Chief Learning Officer at Penn Foster Group. “This survey emphasizes the critical need for flexible, skills-based, and accessible learning options that prepare students for career success and keep them on track for graduation while supporting their overall well-being. By embracing innovative models such as online education, credit recovery, summer school, and blended learning, we can ensure that students not only graduate but thrive in an ever-changing world.”
Mental health remains a pressing issue, with 72 percent of teachers anticipating an increase in anxiety and stress among students in 2025. Teachers cited these challenges, along with social isolation and academic pressure as barriers to engagement and success. In response, many educators are implementing innovative strategies such as project-based learning, internships, and career exploration opportunities to meet students where they are and offer better support.
Online learning also serves as a lifeline for students who need additional support to stay on track for graduation. Penn Foster Group works with teachers and counselors who highlight the growing use of online courses for credit recovery, summer school, and blended learning models, allowing students in traditional schools to customize their education to meet their unique needs. These programs provide students with a second chance to earn missed credits, accelerate their progress, and engage with coursework in a way that accommodates personal schedules, extracurricular commitments, and other responsibilities.
As demand for alternative learning pathways rises, Penn Foster Group remains at the forefront of education innovation by focusing on practical skills and flexible, online program delivery. The latest data reinforces Penn Foster Group’s commitment to delivering forward-thinking education that empowers high school learners’ continued adaptability and success.
This press release originally appeared online.
Education
Microsoft Partners with eVidyaloka to Revolutionize AI Education for 37,000 Rural Students in India, ET Education
In a transformative push to bring Artificial Intelligence (AI) education to the heart of rural India, Microsoft, in partnership with eVidyaloka, is empowering around 37,000 students with Responsible AI training through Build Rural Artificial Intelligence Network (BRAIN) program. Now, in its second year, BRAIN has grown from 300 government schools in its pilot phase to more than 400 schools across 10 states of India.
Drawing on Microsoft’s Responsible AI principles and powered by its technology, curriculum, corporate social responsibility grants, devices, and volunteer network with strategic corporate partners, the program is not only teaching foundational AI concepts, but also enabling hands-on innovation in the classrooms, where access to advanced digital tools was once unimaginable.
One of the milestones in this year was the distribution of laptops to 108 government schools through Microsoft’s in-kind donation program, enabling more than 6,000 students to experience AI for the first time, through hands-on learning. Meanwhile, the Teacher Training (ToT) program equipped 343 educators in nine states with AI pedagogy and digital skills, laying the foundation for sustainable, long-term impact.
At the center of this initiative, offering 22 modules on AI for students and teachers is BRAINIAC 2025, a national AI innovation challenge that puts knowledge into action. It invites students from the government schools to identify pressing local issues in their schools or neighbourhoods and design practical, AI-powered solutions. By blending classroom instruction with hands-on problem-solving, BRAINIAC transforms digital education into a tool for grassroots innovation and community impact.
In this year’s challenge, 748 student teams (1,496 students) have come forward with innovative AI-driven prototypes addressing real-life issues, from smart dustbins and navigational systems to energy management tools and attendance solutions. Guided by trained Class Assistants and volunteer mentors, the initiative is redefining what students can achieve when given the right platform.
The program’s reach is further amplified by eVidyaloka’s Teach Through Television (TTT) model, which blends television and online content to overcome access barriers. In 2024–25, the TTT platform recorded 14.58 lakh views, delivering AI modules in five languages—Telugu, Tamil, Hindi, Kannada, and English—with redesigned content broken into 66 short, engaging lessons enhanced with motion graphics and interactive quizzes.
“Through the BRAINIAC Challenge, we are not just introducing rural students to Artificial Intelligence, we are enabling them to become thinkers, creators, and problem-solvers in their own communities. It’s heartening to see students take ownership of their learning journeys and build solutions that are meaningful, relevant, and deeply rooted in the community.” said Brinda Poornapragna, CEO of eVidyaloka.
Microsoft’s volunteer ecosystem has played a key role in co-developing curriculum and hosting student’s Meet & Greets with tech professionals. Collaborative efforts with Microsoft’s partner organisations like Nirmaan to adapt the BRAIN curriculum, further extended the reach of this Responsible AI course to 4,100 students across Tamil Nadu, ensuring exposure to global tech thinking even in India’s remotest classrooms.
Education
It is this government’s moral mission to give every child in Britain the best start in life | Bridget Phillipson
Like many young mothers, Jenna was unsure where to start. But that’s where her local family support service came in. Offering breastfeeding advice, a space to come together with other parents and for her son Billy to play with other babies, it reassured Jenna that she was on the right track – and crucially, that Billy was set up to achieve when he got to school.
Jenna’s service was the first of Labour’s renowned Sure Start centres in Washington, my home town in north-east England. I knew it well: before becoming an MP I ran a refuge nearby for women fleeing domestic violence. I linked up the women who used our refuge with Sure Start. It was a lifeline for those women who, despite everything, were determined to give their children the very best start in life.
But, sadly, after 14 years of Conservative government, stories like Jenna’s, and those of the many women who were offered that lifeline, are much less common. Funding was stripped out of Sure Start centres and services scrapped in rebranded family hubs. Today, 65 councils, and the children and families who live under their authority, have missed out on recent funding. Many more are lacking the childcare places that so many families in our country need.
For every Jenna, there are a host of other young mothers, and families, who missed out on crucial pillars of support, whose children have fallen behind before they have even started school.
One in three five-year-olds enters year 1 without the basic skills – like holding a pencil and writing their own name – that they need to make the most of what education has to offer them. Some haven’t reached essential milestones such as putting on a coat or going to the toilet by themselves.
For the most vulnerable children, the situation is graver. Just over half of those eligible for free school meals reach a good level of development at age five. For children in social care, it’s just over one in three. And for children with special educational needs, it’s one in five.
The gap in achievement we see between our poorest and most affluent children at 16 is baked in before they even start school, creating a vicious cycle of lost life chances that’s all too visible in the shameful number of young people not earning or learning.
It’s this government’s moral mission to bridge that gap, but to do it we must build an education system where all children can achieve and thrive, starting from day one.
That is why reforming the early years education system is my number one priority. And it’s why, just 12 months after Labour entered government, I am so proud to be setting out our strategy to give every child the best start in life.
Backed by £1.5bn over the next three years, it brings together the best of Sure Start, health services, community groups and the early years sector, with the shared goal of setting up children to succeed when they get to school.
We will create 1,000 Best Start Family Hubs, at least one in every council area, invest a record £9bn in funded childcare and early years places – and hundreds of millions to improve quality in early years settings and reception classes.
These hubs will bring disjointed support systems into one place, allowing thousands of families to access help with anything from birth registration to breastfeeding, from housing support to children’s speech and language development.
The strategy takes inspiration from around the world. I’ve been really impressed by what happens in countries I’ve visited, such as Estonia, where early education and family support are bound tightly together with stellar results. Its disadvantage gap is negligible because children get to school ready to learn. Its children outperform those from much larger, wealthier countries in international rankings. The country punches above its weight economically as a result.
At the heart of our strategy is the recognition that for our country to succeed in a fast-changing world, it is not enough for only some children to do well in education: every child must have the opportunity and the tools not just to get by, but to get on in life.
Working people have always known that education is the best way to break the link between their background and what they go on to achieve, the route to prosperity not just for individuals, but for all of society. It’s a common thread that runs through every Labour government: that we must use education to spread the freedoms that today too few enjoy, so that tomorrow they are common to us all.
It’s the essence of our politics, the socialism of extending freedom to allow working people to choose their own path to fulfilment: to get better employment, to achieve a better quality of life or even to start a family.
This strategy is a watershed moment for our government, but more importantly for every single family who needs our support. To make it a reality, we will begin unprecedented collaboration between parents, councils, nurseries, childminders, schools and government, enmeshing family support, early education and childcare so deeply that no rightwing government can ever unpick it, as the Tories did with Sure Start over 14 long years.
Our plan for change will ensure Jenna’s experience – and Billy’s future success – is shared by every family and every child in our country.
-
Funding & Business6 days ago
Kayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Mergers & Acquisitions6 days ago
Donald Trump suggests US government review subsidies to Elon Musk’s companies
-
Funding & Business6 days ago
Rethinking Venture Capital’s Talent Pipeline
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Why Agentic AI Isn’t Pure Hype (And What Skeptics Aren’t Seeing Yet)
-
Funding & Business3 days ago
Sakana AI’s TreeQuest: Deploy multi-model teams that outperform individual LLMs by 30%
-
Funding & Business7 days ago
From chatbots to collaborators: How AI agents are reshaping enterprise work
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Telangana Launches TGDeX—India’s First State‑Led AI Public Infrastructure
-
Funding & Business6 days ago
Europe’s Most Ambitious Startups Aren’t Becoming Global; They’re Starting That Way
-
Jobs & Careers4 days ago
Ilya Sutskever Takes Over as CEO of Safe Superintelligence After Daniel Gross’s Exit