Top Stories
Priscilla Presley Sued for $50 Million by Ex-Partners

A month after a Florida judge said Priscilla Presley’s 2024 financial elder abuse claims would take the lead over a related 2023 lawsuit accusing her of breach of contract, the former business partners facing off against Priscilla in both cases are expanding their legal war.
On Monday, memorabilia dealer Brigitte Kruse and investor Kevin Fialko filed a new $50 million fraud and breach of contract lawsuit against Presley in Beverly Hills that re-ups many of the same causes of action recently placed on the back burner in Orlando. But the new complaint doesn’t stop there. It also escalates the acrimony with the eye-popping claim that Priscilla hastened her daughter Lisa Marie Presley’s tragic death in January 2023 for financial gain. And it adds Stan Lee’s ex-manager, Keya Morgan, as a new co-defendant tied to claims that he interfered with the partners’ contracts with Priscilla.
Regarding its most shocking new claim, the complaint attaches Lisa Marie’s advanced health care directive as an exhibit. On the document, Lisa Marie wrote her initials and two exclamation points next to the line that said she wanted her life to be “prolonged as long as possible within the limits of generally accepted healthcare standards.” In the new lawsuit, Kruse and Fialko allege that Priscilla rushed to West Hills Hospital and took control of her daughter’s care when Lisa Marie suffered a small bowel obstruction in January 2023 as a complication from weight loss surgery.
“Despite Lisa’s clear directive to ‘prolong her life,’ Priscilla pulled the plug within hours of Lisa being admitted, and before her granddaughter, Riley [Keough] was able to get to the hospital,” the new lawsuit alleges. The complaint says Priscilla then demanded that Kruse issue a media statement announcing the death. According to the complaint, “Priscilla knew that Lisa’s death neutralized the threat of Lisa’s efforts to have Priscilla removed as the sole trustee of Lisa’s irrevocable life insurance trust, and Priscilla ultimately wanted to control the Promenade Trust and Graceland.”
In a lengthy statement sent to Rolling Stone, Priscilla’s lawyer, Marty Singer, blasted the new lawsuit as “one of the most shameful, ridiculous, salacious, and meritless lawsuits I have seen in my practice.”
“Accusing a grieving mother of contributing to her daughter’s death is not savvy advocacy; it is malicious character assassination and should be broadly condemned. These fabricated claims have absolutely no validity and we are confident this case will be dismissed,” Singer wrote in his statement. He went on to slam the lawsuit as a “sad and vicious attempt to falsely tarnish the reputation of an eighty-year-old woman in blatant retaliation for bringing a lawsuit to redress the wrongful conduct of Brigitte Kruse, Kevin Fialko, and their coconspirators.”
According to both the Florida case and the new Los Angeles County-based complaint, Kruse and Fialko allege that after Lisa Marie’s death, Priscilla’s fortunes changed, and she subsequently walked out on a series of companies they had formed to exploit her name, image, and likeness. They allege they invested heavily to pull Priscilla back from the brink of insolvency and were later shunned, in violation of their agreements.
As Rolling Stone previously reported, a few weeks after Lisa Marie’s death, Priscilla challenged a 2016 amendment to her daughter’s Promenade Trust that removed Priscilla as a trustee and replaced her with Keough. The change meant Priscilla lost influence over her daughter’s assets, including Graceland mansion, its archives, and Lisa Marie’s 15 percent interest in Elvis Presley Enterprises, the company that owns and manages Elvis’ name, image, and likeness. Priscilla wanted the court to declare the amendment “invalid.”
With a potential legal war looming, Keough reached a generous settlement with her grandmother in a matter of months. Under the deal, Priscilla received a $1 million lump-sum payment off the top of Lisa Marie’s $25 million life insurance policy. Keough also agreed to pay Priscilla $50,000 to resign as co-trustee of the irrevocable trust whose sole asset was the life insurance policy. And Priscilla was awarded an annual salary of $100,000 for 10 years for her new role as a “special advisor” to the Promenade Trust.
Five months after she settled with Keough, Priscilla was hit with the first breach of contract lawsuit over the Kruse and Fialko partnership. The author, actress, and ex-wife of Elvis quickly sought to dismiss the complaint. Then last summer, she filed her bombshell claims of financial elder abuse.
In her July 2024 complaint, Priscilla claimed Kruse and Fialko “manipulated and defrauded” her out of more than $1 million. She said the pair placed a “stranglehold” on her finances with contracts that gave Kruse a controlling 51 percent interest in Priscilla’s intellectual property in perpetuity. She said another related venture gave Priscilla only a 20 percent share. Priscilla and her lawyers called the deals too “egregious” and “unconscionable” to be enforceable.
In the July 9 ruling that stayed the Florida litigation in favor of Priscilla’s elder abuse lawsuit, the Orlando-based judge said he was placing the breach of contract case in a holding pattern because it didn’t make sense to “enforce rights under agreements” when the “validity” of the agreements remained “squarely in dispute in the California case.” That ruling set the stage for Kruse and Fialko to file their claims on the West Coast.
“My clients are very adamant they want to get to the merits of the case. They want the truth out, and they want to be vindicated,” Kruse and Fialko’s lawyer, Jordan Matthews, tells Rolling Stone. “They want their day in court.”
While Priscilla maintains she was duped into signing the business contracts with Kruse and Fialko, the former partners say she understood everything. Video unearthed by Rolling Stone shows Priscilla signing the contracts at Kruse’s house with a lawyer present.
In a statement sent to Rolling Stone late Wednesday, Morgan defended his work with Priscilla. “I’ve known Priscilla Presley and her family for many years, and she has a heart of gold, is an incredible human being, and a true legend and American icon [who] should be protected,” he wrote. “Unfortunately, I’ve read a lot of malicious lies recently which are not true, and the truth will ultimately prevail.”
Top Stories
Source: Dak Prescott’s spitting won’t be viewed as taunting

Common sense strongly suggests that Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott’s spit to the ground provoked Eagles defensive tackle Jalen Carter. While Prescott surely didn’t believe that it would result in Carter spitting on Dak’s shirt, it would be naive to think he wasn’t trying to press Carter’s buttons.
By the way, it worked.
Still, Prescott’s spit didn’t violate the rules. There’s no general rule against spitting on the ground. Some have suggested that Prescott’s spittle could be construed as taunting.
While, in theory, spitting on the ground as part of a post-play celebration could, when coupled with other actions, amount to taunting, a source with knowledge of the league’s thinking on the matter tells PFT that Prescott’s spitting will not be regarded as taunting.
Two years ago, the league started disclosing all fines levied in a given week on the following Saturday. If further examination and discussion regarding the situation results in a change in the current viewpoint, it will be known in eight days whether a fine was, or wasn’t, imposed on Prescott for taunting Carter.
Currently, a Prescott fine for taunting should be regarded as very highly unlikely.
Top Stories
Trump Summons Tech Execs to Dinner: Let’s Go Over Seating Chart

Katie Notopoulos: Let’s talk about the seating arrangements of the Trump dinner with tech CEOs. The photos are causing me intense thirdhand discomfort.
The first thing that jumps out is who is seated closest to President Trump: Mark Zuckerberg on one side, then “crypto czar” David Sacks. On the other side of Melania Trump is Bill Gates. What does it all mean?
Peter Kafka: My operating theory for all of the seating decisions is that the people closest to Trump are both 1) the most powerful people in tech, but also 2) people Trump recognizes. Like, I’m pretty sure he couldn’t pick Alexandr Wang of Scale AI (now Meta) or Mark Pincus of Zynga out of any lineups. So to the end of the table they go!
Katie: That sounds about right. Technically, Bill Gates isn’t even a tech CEO anymore; he’s retired! The same (sort of) is true for Sergey Brin, who had a prime seat right across from Trump, next to Tim Cook. But Satya Nadella, the actual CEO of Microsoft, who is less recognizable than Gates, was way off at the end of the table.
Peter: Sergey, as you may recall, told Google employees in 2016 that he found Trump’s election victory “deeply offensive.” But who cares about the past! Donald Trump looks forward, not backward (except when he’s not).
Katie: They’ve all come around, right? To varying degrees? Trump wanted to throw Zuck in jail, and now he’s seated at his right hand! (On a side note, I expect to see this Getty photo of Zuck and Trump as the art for a lot of articles in the future!)
Peter: Zuck is Trump’s new BFF (say people who would like us to believe that). But sitting next to Donald Trump is a double-edged sword: If you’re at the edge of the table, he’s not going to bother you, but if you’re in the front of the class, you have to be prepared for a pop quiz.
Which Zuck apparently was not. The WSJ noted: “Zuckerberg, who seemed startled by a question directed at him, responded that he hadn’t been listening.” Which, honestly, is the most relatable thing about Mark Zuckerberg I’ve ever heard.
Katie: What did you think of Tim Cook and Sam Altman sitting next to each other?
Peter: Game recognize game, is what I think. Tim Cook was the master Trump tech-whisperer in the first go-round, and remains top of his game.
But Altman went from a guy who blogged about how terrible Trump was the first time around to a guy who managed to wedge his way into an AI deal that Elon Musk wanted — while Musk was still Shadow President.
Katie: Speaking of Musk — he wasn’t there, but it’s pretty easy to guess why (he and Trump are on the outs at the moment). But more notably absent was Nvidia’s Jensen Huang, who has also seemed to emerge as something of a Trump Whisperer. Lisa Su of AMD was there. Perhaps he was just busy?
Peter: Particularly interesting because Jensen made a point of being seen by Trump at other Big Tech goat rodeos. “I see my friend is here, Jensen,” Trump said when he made many of these people fly to Saudi Arabia to sit near him earlier this year. “Tim Cook isn’t here, but you are.”
Katie: Let’s talk about some of the lesser-known attendees, people who aren’t so instantly recognizable, like:
Jason Chang of biotech company CSBio. John Hering of Lookout and a Musk ally. Jamie Siminoff, founder of Ring, and David Limp from Blue Origin (perhaps filling in for Andy Jassy or Jeff Bezos)? Sunny Madra of AI chip maker Groq. Vivek Ranadivé, tech veteran and current owner of the Sacramento Kings. Dylan Field of Figma. Sanjay Mehrotra of Micron. Shyam Sankar, CTO of Palantir (Alex Karp, the CEO, wasn’t there).
Peter: Katie, maybe you don’t know this feeling, but I do: Ever get an invite to a cool thing but it’s happening in, like, a day, which suggests that you’re a last-minute add because someone else dropped out/or they couldn’t fill the room?
Because some of these attendees are … surprising.
Peter: By far, my favorite low-profile attendee is Jared Isaacman. If that name is familiar, it’s because he reportedly played a key role in the Elon Musk/Trump breakup earlier this year.
Musk had put him forward as the head of NASA, and Trump agreed to it, but apparently changed his mind after he learned that Isaacman once said and did nice things for Democrats. This all led to a gnarly White House humiliation. I wonder if Trump remembers that. I’m sure Musk does.
Katie: So clearly there were some tensions here — both between the CEOs and Trump and also with each other. Who at the dinner, excluding Trump, has the biggest beef with each other at the moment?
Peter: Tim vs. Mark is an oldie but goodie.
Katie: Sam Altman and Mark Zuckberg seem to be trading little public barbs lately, and are fighting over poaching employees.
This all leaves me with one big question: Who do you think had the worst time?
Peter: I don’t know! I don’t know who would have a good time at a command performance like this. But I keep thinking about the 2016 version of this roundtable, when just about everyone assembled was profoundly uncomfortable (except maybe Peter Thiel, but it’s hard to figure out when that person is/isn’t comfortable).
I think this time around, some of the folks at the table, like Sacks and Chamath, are delighted about it. And for the rest, they certainly know what the score is.
Top Stories
Jason Kelce Under Scrutiny For Stance On Jalen Carter, Dak Prescott Incident

Former Philadelphia Eagles star Jason Kelce didn’t hide his true feelings about Dallas Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott’s scuffle with Jalen Carter, even if it aggravated NFL fans around the country.
Before the first snap from scrimmage on Thursday night, Carter was ejected for spitting on Prescott. That certainly hurt the Eagles since he’s one of the best defensive players in the league. He owned up to his mistake during his postgame media availability.
Advertisement
“It was a mistake that happened on my side, and it just won’t happen again,” Carter said. “I feel bad for my teammates and the fans out there. I’m doing it for them. … It won’t happen again. I can make that promise.”
Even though Carter took accountability for his actions, Kelce defended him on social media. In fact, he suggested that Prescott was responsible for this absurd moment.
Late on Thursday night, NBC shared footage of Prescott spitting on the ground near Carter. That video was reposted by Kelce along with this message: “And the truth shall set you free.”
Advertisement
KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI – NOVEMBER 4: ESPN analyst Jason Kelce on set prior to the game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers at GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium on November 4, 2024 in Kansas City, Missouri. (Photo by Aaron M. Sprecher/Getty Images)Aaron M. Sprecher/Getty Images
Kelce missed the mark.
Just about every reply to this post from Kelce points out how ridiculous his stance on this situation is. At the end of the day, Prescott didn’t actually spit on Carter. The All-Pro defensive lineman for the Eagles, on the other hand, legitimately crossed the line.
“Spitting on someone and spitting on the ground is 2 different things,” former NFL offensive lineman Jon Feliciano replied.
“This is either intellectually dishonest or intellectually limited. I don’t know which. Dak is spitting at the ground. Tyler Booker is between him and Jalen Carter. Carter was six inches away and spat on him. This is comparing coughing around someone and coughing on someone,” Cowboys reporter Bobby Belt said.
Advertisement
“Dak spit on the ground because he’s not an idiot,” one fan wrote. “Jalen Carter spit on Dak because he’s a complete idiot. Glad we can clear that truth up.”
“Crazy work to go to bat for your former teammate when they do something stupid right on front of the ref but here we are,” a second fan said.
“Jason always does some dumb stuff to defend these losers,” a Taylor Swift fan commented.
Prescott shares his side to the story.
Following the Cowboys’ 24-20 loss to the Eagles, Prescott spoke to the media about his altercation with Carter. He revealed what led to this absurd moment.
Advertisement
“He was trolling, I guess you could say, trying to mess with Tyler Booker. I was just looking at him,” Prescott said. “I was right here by the two linemen, and I guess I needed to spit, and I wasn’t going to spit on my lineman and I just spit ahead. … And he goes, ‘Are you trying to spit on me?’ At that point, I mean I felt like he was insulting me. I wouldn’t spit on somebody. ‘I’m damn sure I’m not trying to spit on you.’ We’re about to play a game. … ‘What would I need to spin on you for?’ He just spit on me in that moment, it was more of a surprise than anything.”
The NFL has not yet announced if it’ll discipline Carter for his behavior. Earlier this year though, the league said it will crack down on violent gestures. Spitting on an opponent should classify as one.
This story was originally reported by The Spun on Sep 5, 2025, where it first appeared in the NFL section. Add The Spun as a Preferred Source by clicking here.
-
Business1 week ago
The Guardian view on Trump and the Fed: independence is no substitute for accountability | Editorial
-
Tools & Platforms4 weeks ago
Building Trust in Military AI Starts with Opening the Black Box – War on the Rocks
-
Ethics & Policy1 month ago
SDAIA Supports Saudi Arabia’s Leadership in Shaping Global AI Ethics, Policy, and Research – وكالة الأنباء السعودية
-
Events & Conferences4 months ago
Journey to 1000 models: Scaling Instagram’s recommendation system
-
Jobs & Careers2 months ago
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Education2 months ago
VEX Robotics launches AI-powered classroom robotics system
-
Funding & Business2 months ago
Kayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months ago
Happy 4th of July! 🎆 Made with Veo 3 in Gemini
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months ago
OpenAI 🤝 @teamganassi
-
Education2 months ago
Macron says UK and France have duty to tackle illegal migration ‘with humanity, solidarity and firmness’ – UK politics live | Politics