AI Insights
Colorado governor calls special session, urging lawmakers to delay AI law

Colorado Gov. Jared Polis on Wednesday called lawmakers back to the capitol on later this month for a special legislative session, potentially delaying the state’s artificial intelligence law from being implemented until 2027.
The Artificial Intelligence Act, which Polis signed in 2024, is the first state law in the U.S. to regulate high-risk AI systems in areas like hiring, lending, housing, insurance and government services. The law, scheduled to take effect next February, requires companies to conduct bias risk assessments, notify users when AI is involved in consequential decisions and provide an appeals process for those adversely affected.
In an executive order calling for the special session, Polis expressed the need to clarify the definitions and ease the compliance process, so the state isn’t footing the bill. The special session would occur Aug. 21.
“I am also asking the General Assembly to take action related to preserving access to health services, tackling the growing cost of private health insurance on the individual market, and addressing the impending and costly implementation of artificial intelligence legislation,” Polis wrote.
Lawmakers attempted to clarify terms of the bill and delay the law until January 2027 during the 2025 legislative session, but their efforts failed when they didn’t find consensus.
Prominent tech companies like Amazon, Google and Salesforce reportedly oppose the legislation, arguing that the law will stifle innovation and balloon their budgets, while other major players, such as Microsoft and IBM, have supported the measure.
Travis Hall, director of state engagement at the Center for Democracy and Technology, told StateScoop in an emailed statement that the bill primarily affects private-sector developers.
“Colorado’s groundbreaking law provides a range of common-sense, baseline transparency and accountability requirements for the use of AI in consequential decisions such as housing and employment,” Hall said. “Coloradan workers, consumers, and citizens have made clear their support for guardrails when these tools are used in contexts that affect people’s lives and livelihoods.”
Hall added that though Polis seeks to remove the need for additional money to cover state agency compliance costs from the AI legislation, he is unclear on how the removal will impact the state’s AI regulation or limit consideration of the bill’s amendments. He encouraged state lawmakers to resist any revisions.
“As the Colorado legislature convenes to consider revisions to this law, it must reject attempts to remove any meaningful oversight,” Hall said. “We urge legislators to stand strong in their efforts to protect their constituents from the documented harms that the unaccountable use of these tools can cause.”
AI Insights
AI firm Anthropic agrees to pay authors $1.5bn for pirating work

Artificial intelligence (AI) firm Anthropic has agreed to pay $1.5bn (£1.11bn) to settle a class action lawsuit filed by authors who said the company stole their work to train its AI models.
The deal, which requires the approval of US District Judge William Alsup, would be the largest publicly-reported copyright recovery in history, according to lawyers for the authors.
It comes two months after Judge Alsup found that using books to train AI did not violate US copyright law, but ordered Anthropic to stand trial over its use of pirated material.
Anthropic said on Friday that the settlement would “resolve the plaintiffs’ remaining legacy claims.”
The settlement comes as other big tech companies including ChatGPT-maker OpenAI, Microsoft, and Instagram-parent Meta face lawsuits over similar alleged copyright violations.
Anthropic, with its Claude chatbot, has long pitched itself as the ethical alternative among its competitors.
“We remain committed to developing safe AI systems that help people and organisations extend their capabilities, advance scientific discovery, and solve complex problems,” said Aparna Sridhar, Deputy General Counsel at Anthropic which is backed by both Amazon and Google-parent Alphabet.
The lawsuit was filed against Anthropic last year by best-selling mystery thriller writer Andrea Bartz, whose novels include We Were Never Here, along with The Good Nurse author Charles Graeber and The Feather Thief author Kirk Wallace Johnson.
They accused the company of stealing their work to train its Claude AI chatbot in order to build a multi-billion dollar business.
The company holds more than seven million pirated books in a central library, according to Judge Alsup’s June decision, and faced up to $150,000 in damages per copyrighted work.
His ruling was among the first to weigh in on how Large Language Models (LLMs) can legitimately learn from existing material.
It found that Anthropic’s use of the authors’ books was “exceedingly transformative” and therefore allowed under US law.
But he rejected Anthropic’s request to dismiss the case.
Anthropic was set to stand trial in December over its use of pirated copies to build its library of material.
Plaintiffs lawyers called the settlement announced Friday “the first of its kind in the AI era.”
“It will provide meaningful compensation for each class work and sets a precedent requiring AI companies to pay copyright owners,” said lawyer Justin Nelson representing the authors. “This settlement sends a powerful message to AI companies and creators alike that taking copyrighted works from these pirate websites is wrong.”
The settlement could encourage more cooperation between AI developers and creators, according to Alex Yang, Professor of Management Science and Operations at London Business School.
“You need that fresh training data from human beings,” Mr Yang said. “If you want to grant more copyright to AI-created content, you must also strengthen mechanisms that compensate humans for their original contributions.”
AI Insights
Duke University pilot project examining pros and cons of using artificial intelligence in college | National News

We recognize you are attempting to access this website from a country belonging to the European Economic Area (EEA) including the EU which
enforces the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and therefore access cannot be granted at this time.
For any issues, contact jgnews@jg.net or call 260-461-8773.
AI Insights
91% of Jensen Huang’s $4.3 Billion Stock Portfolio at Nvidia Is Invested in Just 1 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Infrastructure Stock

Key Points
-
Most stocks that Nvidia and CEO Jensen Huang invest in tend to be strategic partners or companies that can expand the AI ecosystem.
-
For the AI sector to thrive, there is going to need to be a lot of supporting data centers and other AI infrastructure.
-
One stock that Nvidia is heavily invested in also happens to be one of its customers, a first-mover in the AI-as-a-service space.
-
10 stocks we like better than CoreWeave ›
Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA), the largest company in the world by market cap, is widely known as the artificial intelligence (AI) chip king and the main pick-and-shovel play powering the AI revolution. But as such a big company that is making so much money, the company has all sorts of different operations and divisions aside from its main business.
For instance, Nvidia, which is run by CEO Jensen Huang, actually invests its own capital in publicly traded stocks, most of which seem to have to do with the company itself or the broader AI ecosystem. At the end of the second quarter, Nvidia owned six stocks collectively valued at about $4.3 billion. However, of this amount, 91% of Nvidia’s portfolio is invested in just one AI infrastructure stock.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
A unique relationship
Nvidia has long had a relationship with AI data center company CoreWeave (NASDAQ: CRWV), having been a key supplier of hardware that drives the company’s business. CoreWeave builds data centers specifically tailored to meet the needs of companies looking to run AI applications.
Image source: Getty Images.
These data centers are also equipped with hardware from Nvidia, including the company’s latest graphics processing units (GPUs), which help to train large language models. Clients can essentially rent the necessary hardware to run AI applications from CoreWeave, which saves them the trouble of having to build out and run their own infrastructure. CoreWeave’s largest customer by far is Microsoft, which makes up roughly 60% of the company’s revenue, but CoreWeave has also forged long-term deals with OpenAI and IBM.
Nvidia and CoreWeave’s partnership dates back to at least 2020 or 2021, and Nvidia also invested in the company’s initial public offering earlier this year. Wall Street analysts say it’s unusual to see a large supplier participate in a customer’s IPO. But Nvidia may see it as a key way to bolster the AI sector because meeting future AI demand will require a lot of energy and infrastructure.
CoreWeave is certainly seeing demand. On the company’s second-quarter earnings call, management said its contract backlog has grown to over $30 billion and includes previously discussed contracts with OpenAI, as well as other new potential deals with a range of different clients from start-ups to larger companies. Customers have also been increasing the length of their contracts with CoreWeave.
“In short, AI applications are beginning to permeate all areas of the economy, both through start-ups and enterprise, and demand for our cloud AI services is aggressively growing. Our cloud portfolio is critical to CoreWeave’s ability to meet this growing demand,” CoreWeave’s CEO Michael Intrator said on the company’s earnings call.
Is CoreWeave a buy?
Due to the demand CoreWeave is seeing from the market, the company has been aggressively expanding its data centers to increase its total capacity. To do this, CoreWeave has taken on significant debt, which the capital markets seem more than willing to fund.
At the end of the second quarter, current debt (due within 12 months) grew to about $3.6 billion, up about $1.2 billion year over year. Long-term debt had grown to about $7.4 billion, up roughly $2 billion year over year. That has hit the income statement hard, with interest expense through the first six months of 2025 up to over $530 million, up from roughly $107 million during the same period in 2024.
CoreWeave reported a loss of $1.73 per share in the first six months of the year, better than the $2.23 loss reported during the same time period. Still, investors have expressed concern about growing competition in the AI-as-a-service space. They also question whether or not CoreWeave has a real moat, considering its customers and suppliers. For instance, while CoreWeave has a strong partnership with Nvidia, that does not prevent others in the space from forging partnerships. Additionally, CoreWeave’s main customers, like Microsoft, could choose to build their own data centers and infrastructure in-house.
CoreWeave also trades at over a $47 billion market cap but is still losing significant money. The valuation also means the company is trading at 10 times forward sales. Now, in fairness, CoreWeave has grown revenue through the first half of the year by 276% year over year. It all boils down to whether the company can maintain its first-mover advantage and whether the AI addressable market can keep growing like it has been.
I think investors can buy the stock for the more speculative part of their portfolio. The high dependence on industry growth and reliance on debt prevent me from recommending a large position at this time.
Should you invest $1,000 in CoreWeave right now?
Before you buy stock in CoreWeave, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and CoreWeave wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $678,148!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,052,193!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,065% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 186% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of August 25, 2025
Bram Berkowitz has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends International Business Machines, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
-
Business1 week ago
The Guardian view on Trump and the Fed: independence is no substitute for accountability | Editorial
-
Tools & Platforms4 weeks ago
Building Trust in Military AI Starts with Opening the Black Box – War on the Rocks
-
Ethics & Policy1 month ago
SDAIA Supports Saudi Arabia’s Leadership in Shaping Global AI Ethics, Policy, and Research – وكالة الأنباء السعودية
-
Events & Conferences4 months ago
Journey to 1000 models: Scaling Instagram’s recommendation system
-
Jobs & Careers2 months ago
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Education2 months ago
VEX Robotics launches AI-powered classroom robotics system
-
Funding & Business2 months ago
Kayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months ago
Happy 4th of July! 🎆 Made with Veo 3 in Gemini
-
Education2 months ago
Macron says UK and France have duty to tackle illegal migration ‘with humanity, solidarity and firmness’ – UK politics live | Politics
-
Podcasts & Talks2 months ago
OpenAI 🤝 @teamganassi