Connect with us

Top Stories

After war meet, Netanyahu said to favor complete conquest of Gaza even if hostages harmed

Published

on


Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with senior security officials on Tuesday to hammer out Gaza war plans, and reportedly came out in favor of the military taking control of the entire enclave, even if it meant that the remaining hostages could be harmed or executed by Hamas.

The meeting came amid multiple reports of rising tensions between the prime minister and IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir over the prospect of Israeli forces fully occupying the enclave.

The Prime Minister’s Office said in a brief statement that Netanyahu “held a limited security discussion today that lasted about 3 hours, in which the chief of staff presented the options for continuing the campaign in Gaza.”

“The IDF is prepared to implement any decision made by the security cabinet,” the statement added, an apparent reference to reported opposition from the IDF chief to plans to reoccupy Gaza, following the apparent breakdown of hostage-ceasefire talks with Hamas in recent weeks.

The meeting aimed to finalize a plan to present to a broader cabinet session later this week, according to reports in multiple Hebrew outlets.

Others attending Tuesday’s meeting included Defense Minister Israel Katz, Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer and IDF Operations Directorate head Maj. Gen. Itzik Cohen.

Far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich — both ardent advocates of a complete Gaza takeover by Israel — were excluded from the meeting, Israel Hayom reported.

Netanyahu reportedly told ministers this week that he will seek cabinet backing for a plan to fully occupy the Gaza Strip, despite objections from within the IDF. Zamir was said to have opposed the plan, sparking anger against the IDF chief from Netanyahu loyalists, with unnamed senior officials calling on him to resign if he didn’t like his orders.

Hostage families and their supporters rally at Hostages Square in Tel Aviv on August 2, 2025. The screen shows, from right to left, pictures of hostage Evyatar David before his abduction; in a propaganda video from February 2025; and in a propaganda video from July 2025. (Avshalom Sassoni/Flash90)

Following the meeting, an unnamed source familiar with the talks told the Kan public broadcaster that Netanyahu is heavily leaning toward occupying the Palestinian enclave. Other Hebrew-language news outlets, including Ynet and i24 News, carried similar reports, all quoting anonymous sources.

One source told Kan that the government is aware that the military campaign to gain full control over Gaza will likely endanger the remaining hostages, of whom 20 are believed to be alive.

The report said that the IDF and the defense establishment remain opposed to the plan, in part because it puts the hostages in danger of being executed by their captors should troops approach where they are being held.

The IDF currently holds control over approximately 75 percent of the Gaza Strip, but under the new plan, the military would be expected to occupy the remaining territory as well, bringing the entire enclave under Israeli control.

The military has largely refrained from operating in certain areas where it is believed that the hostages are held. Hamas has repeatedly said it will execute them if it believes Israeli forces are closing in.

It is also unclear what such a move would mean for the Strip’s millions of civilians and humanitarian groups operating in the enclave.

Earlier Tuesday, reports of Zamir’s reluctance drew sharp condemnations from the far-right and Netanyahu loyalists, including his son.

Ben Gvir urged Zamir to publicly commit to carrying out the orders of elected officials, even if they decide on the occupation of the Strip

IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir meets with officers at an army base, July 22, 2025. (Israel Defense Forces)

“The chief of staff must say clearly that he will fully carry out the orders of the political echelon, even if it’s decided to go for full conquest and a clear result,” Ben Gvir said in a post on X.

Netanyahu’s eldest son, Yair, also took to social media from his home in Miami to lambaste Zamir in a series of posts on X, and implied the IDF chief was trying to lead a military rebellion against his father.

He claimed Zamir was only appointed to his position because Defense Minister Katz insisted on the choice.

He also seemed to imply that Zamir secretly dictated a post on X  by Yedioth Aharonoth military correspondent Yossi Yehoshua, in which the journalist criticized Netanyahu’s reported plan to occupy Gaza.

Yair Netanyahu arrives for a court hearing in Tel Aviv on November 29, 2022. (Avshalom Sassoni/ Flash90/ File)

“If Netanyahu really is interested in making the really dramatic and divisive decision among the Israeli public — the occupation of Gaza City and the central camps — he needs to stand before the nation, clarify the expected price to the lives of the hostages and soldiers who will fall, and declare that he takes full responsibility, despite the IDF’s opposition,” Yehoshua wrote.

Yair Netanyahu replied: “If whoever dictated to you that tweet is who we think, this is a rebellion and attempted military coup fit for a banana republic in Central America during the 70s. This is completely criminal.”

And even the defense minister appeared to issue a veiled attempt to pressure Zamir into backing down.

“Once the political leadership makes the necessary decisions, the military echelon, as it has done in all fronts of war so far, will professionally implement the determined policy,” Katz said during a visit to an IDF post in the Gaza buffer zone on Tuesday.  “My role as the defense minister in charge of the IDF is to ensure that this will be the case, and that is what I will do.”

Katz said he had formulated his positions “regarding the security and political steps Israel must take to ensure the achievement of the war’s objectives,”  and would present them to Netanyahu and cabinet ministers at the meeting later in the day.

Defense Minister Israel Katz visits an IDF post in the Gaza Strip buffer zone, August 5, 2025. (Ariel Hermoni/Defense Ministry)

Speaking publicly, during a meeting with new recruits to the IDF’s Armored Corps and Combat Engineering Corps at the main military induction base in central Israel, Netanyahu reiterated the three stated aims of the war, without mentioning the prospect of conquering Gaza entirely.

He told troops that there is “still a need to complete the defeat of the enemy in Gaza, to release all our hostages and to ensure that Gaza is no longer a threat to Israel.”

Zamir, however, received support from the opposition and from Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, the sole government minister to back him publicly.

“The chief of staff is required to express his professional opinion clearly and unequivocally to the political echelon. I am convinced that he will do so,” Saar wrote on X. “He is not required to clarify the subordination of the military echelon to the government’s decisions.”

Reports of Netanyahu’s dispute with Zamir prompted objections from Opposition Leader Yair Lapid, who insisted that such disagreements must remain “behind closed doors.”

“IDF soldiers should not think that a divided and conflicted leadership is leading them, that the political echelon does not respect their commander, that they are selling them out for a headline,” Lapid wrote on X.

He added that an “operational price” exists for such leaks, since they could dissuade the IDF chief from voicing his opinion if he thinks it may make it to the press.

Opposition Leader Yair Lapid on the plenum floor of the Knesset in Jerusalem, July 23, 2025. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

Blue and White-National Unity chairman Benny Gantz condemned cabinet ministers’ “unrestrained attacks” against Zamir.

“In the State of Israel, the chief of staff is subordinate to the political echelon, as it has always been and will be, but he is not a puppet on a string or a rubber stamp,” Gantz posted. “Instead of threatening and whining, perhaps it’s worth internalizing: The problem lies with the political echelon, not the military one.”

The war began with the Hamas-led October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which killed some 1,200 people and took more than 250 hostage. Since then, the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry says more than 60,000 people in the Strip have been killed or are presumed dead in the fighting, though the toll cannot be verified and does not differentiate between civilians and fighters.

IDF troops operate in the Gaza Strip, in an image published on August 5, 2025. (Israel Defense Forces)

Israel says it has killed some 20,000 combatants in battle as of January and another 1,600 terrorists inside Israel during the October 7 onslaught. Israel has said it seeks to minimize civilian fatalities and stresses that Hamas uses Gaza’s civilians as human shields, fighting from civilian areas including homes, hospitals, schools, and mosques.

Israel’s toll in the ground offensive against Hamas in Gaza and in military operations along the border with the Strip stands at 459. The toll includes two police officers and three Defense Ministry civilian contractors.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top Stories

What the latest jobs report means for you … buckle up

Published

on


After years of plentiful employment opportunities, healthy pay bumps and pandemic savings-fueled spending sprees, American workers now face a sobering economic reality: It’s getting harder and harder to find work, and more and more industries are shedding jobs.

The latest jobs report, released Friday, indicated that the US economy added about 22,000 jobs in August and the unemployment rate ticked up to 4.3%, the highest it’s been in nearly four years.

The job market is “stalling,” Glassdoor economist Daniel Zhao told CNN on Friday, “it’s slowing to a dangerous speed.”

Job growth is practically nonexistent.

And if the labor market is showing signs of a cold, that doesn’t bode well for the overall health of the economy.

Here’s a rundown of the latest data, and how the situation could turn around or take a turn for the worse:

Job growth hasn’t just been weak, it turned negative recently: During the past three months, the US economy has seen a net gain of roughly 29,000 jobs per month, Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows.

If that sounds soft, it’s because it is: Excluding the massive employment plunge at the start of the pandemic, that’s the slowest three-month average since the summer of 2010, when the United States was still clawing its way back from the Great Recession.

Bringing that average down was a now-negative report for June. The second revision for that month (which includes more comprehensive dispatches from US businesses) now shows a net loss of 13,000 jobs.

More industries lost jobs in August than added them: The jobs report contains a nerdy little gauge (a diffusion index) that is meant show the breadth of employment changes across 250 private-sector industries.

If it’s above 50, that means more industries added jobs than lost them. It’s been under 50 since April and measured 49.6 in August. Most of those gains, however, were minimal.

And the hardest-hit sectors are those in the goods business: The impact of President Donald Trump’s tariff policy, and the whipsaw manner in which it’s being applied, is having an “undeniable” impact on hiring, RSM US economist Joe Brusuelas wrote in a note to investors Friday.

Goods businesses have posted “four straight months of declines since May,” he wrote. “Manufacturing, which was supposed to benefit from restrictive trade policies, instead slipped into reverse as supply chain uncertainty deepened.”

Opportunities are growing increasingly limited: The health care industry, which has an aging US populus working in its favor, has been a leading driver of employment growth in recent years.

Now it’s practically the only game in town.

Health care businesses added an estimated 46,800 jobs in August. The industry, however, accounts for only 15% of overall US employment, BLS data shows.

“For 85% of workers, they’re not seeing a lot of the jobs added,” Kory Kantenga, LinkedIn’s head of economics Americas, told CNN this week.

The “canary in the coal mine” is chirping: The unemployment rate for Black workers in the United States rose again last month to 7.5%, the highest level since October 2021.

During the past two months, the unemployment rate for Black workers has risen considerably higher, jumping from 6% to 6.8% in June and then to 7.2% in July.

“The unemployment rate for Black workers will usually rise more than for [White workers] when the labor market weakens, but they usually move in the same direction,” economist Dean Baker, co-founder of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, noted on Friday.

By comparison, the unemployment rate for White workers fell by 0.1 percentage point, to 3.7%.

A rise in the Black unemployment rate is often considered the “canary in the coal mine,” foretelling a broader-scale job market slowdown.

Black workers are disproportionately employed in frontline and lower-wage industries as well as the government workforce. Economists warned earlier this year that Trump’s sweeping policy changes related to trade, immigration, federal employment reductions, as well as a crackdown on diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, could reverse some of the historic employment gains made recently by women, Black workers, Latino workers and other underrepresented Americans.

Economic headwinds and uncertainty are putting a drag on hiring: There’s not one single cause for the slowing job market, but uncertainty certainly hasn’t helped, Glassdoor economist Zhao said.

“Even before this year, the job market was on a slowing trend, interest rates have been fairly high, but we do see with the data in the last few months that some of these tariff-sensitive sectors like manufacturing or construction have slowed and in fact, started losing jobs,” he said. “So, there does seem to be some impact from tariffs and the uncertainty associated with them.”

“It’s not just the fact that there are these tariffs being implemented, policy uncertainty makes it very hard for businesses to commit to hiring plans,” he added.

Rising unemployment can get out of hand … quickly: The unemployment rate of 4.3% still lands within that “healthy”/full employment arena, but if it keeps rising, that’s a big problem.

Unemployment has stayed relatively low in part because of dampened demand for workers as well as a depressed supply (people aging out of the workforce as well as reductions in immigrant workers).

“But, as we start to see unemployment rise, that does start to suggest that this is not just because of shifts on the labor supply side,” Zhao said. “When unemployment starts to rise, those impacts can start to stack up very quickly and unpredictably.”

And if the job market cools further, that means less money in the pockets of American households — and less spending to support more hiring.

“That can build into a cycle of a sharper economic slowdown,” he said.

But a recession isn’t necessarily imminent: The current labor market dynamics are a function of cyclical and structural factors driven largely by trade and immigration policy, said Brusuelas. Those dynamics, as well as the effects of “pervasive uncertainty” will play out over the near to medium term, he noted Friday.

“We expect growth and hiring to reaccelerate as the combination of interest rate cuts, tax cuts and full expensing of business investment bolster demand for labor later this year and early next,” he wrote in the note. “Thus, we do not expect the economy to slip into recession in the near term.”

An interest rate cut, even a small one, could unleash pent-up demand: Toward the end of last year, including after the election, hiring and investment picked up and so did sentiment – especially as inflation appeared to be getting tamed, Ron Hetrick, senior labor economist at Lightcast, told CNN.

“Then that got squandered, when we started doing tariffs, and that possibility of inflation got introduced, then the [Federal Reserve] was like, ‘Hey, all that stuff’s off the table now’ — and so, all of this underground fervor was gone,” he said. “When you lower the interest rate, the Fed is signaling, ‘We think it’s time to start this engine again.’”





Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

Justin Herbert, Chargers topple Chiefs for Week 1 win in Brazil

Published

on

By


Justin Herbert threw for 318 yards and three touchdowns in outdueling Patrick Mahomes, and the Los Angeles Chargers beat Kansas City 27-21 on Friday night in Sao Paulo, snapping a seven-game skid to the Chiefs.

“It’s monumental,” Chargers coach Jim Harbaugh said. “September 5th will go down in some Charger lore, in my opinion. It was a big win.”

The NFL’s second game played in South America was streamed on YouTube, with Brazilian soccer superstar Neymar in attendance. Newly engaged pop superstar Taylor Swift wasn’t there to watch fiancé Travis Kelce and see Colombian singer Karol G perform at halftime.

Los Angeles Chargers quarterback Justin Herbert runs against the Kansas City Chiefs during the first half of an NFL football game, Friday, Sept. 5, 2025, in Sao Paulo. AP

Herbert became just the third quarterback in Chargers history with 300 yards and three TDs in a season opener. His 19-yard run on third-and-14 dashed any comeback hopes the Chiefs had with 2:21 to play. He finished 25 of 34 and was sacked three times.

“We knew it was going to be a dogfight, so we showed up today with our best effort,” Herbert said. “It was fun to see.”

Mahomes was 24 of 39 for 258 yards, one touchdown and two sacks.

Herbert’s 23-yard TD pass to Quentin Johnston extended the lead to 26-18 with 5:02 remaining in the fourth. They hooked up for a 5-yard TD on the Chargers’ opening drive of the game.

Travis Kelce scored one touchdown in the loss. REUTERS
Kansas City Chiefs’ Travis Kelce celebrates scoring a touchdown. REUTERS

Chased by Khalil Mack, Mahomes threw incomplete to Marquise Brown on first-and-goal at the LA 9. Two more incomplete passes brought on Harrison Butker, whose 27-yard field goal cut the deficit to 27-21 with 2:34 remaining.

The Chiefs closed to 20-18 on Mahomes’ 37-yard TD pass to Kelce early in the fourth. The 2-point conversion failed as Mahomes’ pass was incomplete to Noah Gray.

The Chiefs were coming off their first TD drive in the third when they gave one right back to their AFC rivals. Herbert’s short left pass to Keenan Allen for 11 yards extended the Chargers’ lead to 19-12. Herbert and Allen had over 300 receptions together before Allen left for Chicago last season. He returned to Los Angeles last month.

Los Angeles Chargers quarterback Justin Herbert (10) and center Bradley Bozeman (75) celebrate after the game against the Kansas City Chiefs at Corinthians Arena. Amanda Perobelli/Reuters via Imagn Images

The Chargers beat the Chiefs for the first time since Sept. 26, 2021, in Kansas City.

Injuries

The Chiefs were already down two receivers to start the game, with Rashee Rice suspended to start the season and rookie Jalen Royals out with a knee injury.

They lost another one three snaps into the game.

Xavier Worthy and teammate Kelce collided on a third-down pass. Worthy had to be helped off the field and was later ruled out with a right shoulder injury.

Chargers linebacker Denzel Perryman didn’t return after leaving with an ankle injury in the third.

Up next

Chargers wide receiver Quentin Johnston (1) celebrates with wide receiver Keenan Allen (13) after scoring a touchdown against the Kansas City Chiefs in the second half during a NFL game at Corinthians Arena. Amanda Perobelli/Reuters via Imagn Images

The Chiefs host Philadelphia on Sept. 14 in a Super Bowl rematch.

The Chargers visit Las Vegas on Sept. 15 in the second of three straight against division rivals.



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

Korean Carrier Leaks Apple’s Entire iPhone 17 Lineup, Showcasing Full Specifications Ahead Of September’s ‘Awe Dropping’ Event

Published

on


Apple’s iPhone 17 lineup is shaping up to be one of the most diverse in recent years, with four models designed to target different audiences. According to a newly leaked carrier document from South Korea, Apple is preparing a standard iPhone 17, the ultra-thin iPhone 17 Air, and the more advanced iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max. The carrier document shows a highlight of the specifications that users should be looking forward to next week, as the company will take center stage on September 9.

As highlighted in the leaked carrier document (via Jukanlosreve), the base iPhone 17 does not push the boundaries when it comes to design or innovation in exclusive features, but it is a refinement over the current iPhone 16. It features a 6.3-inch OLED display coupled with the new A19 chip, 8GB of RAM, and a dual camera system consisting of a 48MP main sensor and a 12MP ultra-wide lens. The company is also upgrading the front camera to 24MP, which should bring a noticeable difference in video calls. It is also reported to feature a 3,600mAh battery and, conjoined with the chip’s efficiency and software optimization, we expect it to be even better than the current ‘Pro’ models.

Other than the base variant, Apple’s shiny new toy this year would be the iPhone 17 Air, which will feature an ultra-thin chassis. It will come in at just 5.5mm and weigh only 145 grams, but despite these changes, the device will still feature a 6.6-inch ProMotion display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a resolution of 2740 by 1280. The company has kept the design minimal with a single 48MP main camera and a 24MP front camera. The document claims that the device will be powered by the A19 chip, but we have previously reported that the company will use the A19 Pro chip with a 5-core GPU. The battery is modest, not great, sitting at just 2800mAh, and the company would have to compensate with software optimizations. It will also be the first device after the iPhone 16e to feature Apple’s custom C1 modem, which will possibly contribute to the battery life.

The iPhone 17 Pro models, on the flip side, will come with major improvements on the outside as well as inside. The smaller 6.3-inch iPhone 17 Pro will feature a triple-lens camera setup similar to the iPhone 17 Pro Max, but it could house some differences. The smaller ‘Pro’ would also feature a 3700mAh battery against the Pro Max’s 5000mAh. Both models are slated to come with a new vapor chamber cooling system, which will allow the device to remain cool under heavy workloads. Both models will feature the A19 Pro chips with a 6-core GPU coupled with 12GB of RAM and up to 1TB of storage capacity.

Apple is expected to announce the new models on Monday, September 9, and we will be covering the event in extensive detail, so be sure to stick around for our in-depth coverage.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending