Connect with us

Top Stories

Trump envoy Witkoff says US cutting short Gaza ceasefire talks

Published

on


WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States is cutting short Gaza ceasefire talks and bringing its negotiating team home from Qatar to discuss next steps after Hamas’ latest response “shows a lack of desire” to reach a truce, President Donald Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff said Thursday.

“While the mediators have made a great effort, Hamas does not appear to be coordinated or acting in good faith,” Witkoff said in a statement. “We will now consider alternative options to bring the hostages home and try to create a more stable environment for the people of Gaza.”

State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott would not offer details on what “alternative options” the U.S. is considering to free hostages held by the militant group.

Hamas said in a statement that it was surprised by Witkoff’s “negative remarks” and said it has shown responsibility and flexibility in the negotiating track. It added that it was “keen to reach an agreement that ends the aggression and the suffering of our people in Gaza.”

A breakthrough on a ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas following 21 months of war has eluded the Trump administration as humanitarian conditions worsen in Gaza. Thursday’s move is the latest setback as Trump has tried to position himself as peacemaker and vowed to broker agreements in conflicts from Ukraine to Gaza.

Talks for a Gaza ceasefire have dragged on

When pressed on whether and how the U.S. would proceed on seeking a truce in Gaza, Pigott did not offer clarity and told reporters that “this is a very dynamic situation.”

He said there’s never been a question of the U.S. commitment to reaching a ceasefire and faulted Hamas.

The sides have held weeks of talks in Qatar, reporting small signs of progress but no major breakthroughs. Officials have said a main sticking point is the redeployment of Israeli troops after any ceasefire takes place.

Witkoff said the U.S. is “resolute” in seeking an end to the conflict in Gaza and it was “a shame that Hamas has acted in this selfish way.”

The White House had no comment.

Hamas, in the statement it released early Friday, said it had offered its final answer following wide consultations with Palestinian factions, mediators and countries in the region. It said it has dealt positively with all remarks it received reflecting a “true commitment” to making the efforts of the mediators successful and to “deal constructively” with the presented initiatives.

Hamas said it reaffirmed its “keenness to continue the negotiations and to engage in a way that would ease obstacles and ensure reaching a permanent ceasefire.”

Israel also calls back its negotiators

Earlier Thursday, Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu’s office recalled his negotiating team in light of Hamas’ response. In a brief statement, Netanyahu’s office expressed appreciation for the efforts of Witkoff and other mediators Qatar and Egypt but gave no further details.

The deal under discussion was expected to include an initial 60-day ceasefire in which Hamas would release 10 living hostages and the remains of 18 others in phases in exchange for Palestinians imprisoned by Israel. Aid supplies would be ramped up, and the two sides would hold negotiations on a lasting ceasefire.

The talks have been bogged down over competing demands for ending the war. Hamas says it will only release all hostages in exchange for a full Israeli withdrawal and end to the war. Israel says it will not agree to end the conflict until Hamas gives up power and disarms. The militant group says it is prepared to leave power but not surrender its weapons.

Hamas is believed to be holding the hostages in different locations, including tunnels, and says it has ordered its guards to kill them if Israeli forces approach.

Trump has been pushing for peace

Trump has made little secret of the fact he wants to receive a Nobel Peace Prize. For instance, he has promised to quickly negotiate an end to Russia’s war in Ukraine, but little progress has been made.

On the war in Gaza, Trump met with Netanyahu at the White House this month, putting his weight behind a push to reach a deal.

But despite a partnership further solidified by their countries’ joint strikes on Iran, the Israeli leader left Washington without any breakthrough.

The State Department had said earlier in the week that Witkoff would be traveling to the Middle East for talks, but U.S. officials later said that Witkoff would instead travel to Europe. It was unclear if he held meetings there Thursday.

The apparent derailing of the talks comes as Israel’s blockade and military offensive have driven Gaza to the brink of famine, according to aid groups. The U.N. food agency says nearly 100,000 women and children are suffering from severe, acute malnutrition, and the Gaza Health Ministry has reported a rise in hunger-related deaths.

Israel is criticized for its role in Gaza

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he would hold an emergency call Friday with officials from Germany and France to discuss how to urgently get food to people in need and launch steps to build a lasting peace.

“The suffering and starvation unfolding in Gaza is unspeakable and indefensible,” he said in a statement. The three European countries “all agree on the pressing need for Israel to change course and allow the aid that is desperately needed to enter Gaza without delay.”

French President Emmanuel Macron announced Thursday that France would recognize Palestine as a state, saying, “The urgent thing today is that the war in Gaza stops and the civilian population is saved.″

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said in a social media post late Thursday, “Canada condemns the Israeli government’s failure to prevent the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian disaster in Gaza.” He called for “a two-state solution which guarantees peace and security for Israelis and Palestinians.”

Israel has come under mounting pressure, with 28 Western-aligned countries calling for an end to the war and harshly criticizing Israel’s blockade and a new aid delivery model it has rolled out. More than 100 charity and human rights groups released a similar letter, saying even their own staff are struggling to get enough food.

The U.S. and Israel rejected the allegations and blamed Hamas for prolonging the war by not accepting their terms for a ceasefire.

Israel says it is allowing in enough aid and blames U.N. agencies for not distributing it. But those agencies say it is nearly impossible to safely deliver it because of Israeli restrictions and a breakdown of law and order, with crowds of thousands unloading food trucks as soon as they move into Gaza.

A separate Israeli- and U.S.-backed system run by an American contractor has also been marred by chaos.

“Of course, we want to see the end of devastation that is taking place in Gaza,” Pigott said. “That is why we have supported the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. That is why we’ve seen those 90 million meals being distributed.”

___

Krauss reported from in Ottawa, Ontario. Associated Press writers Josef Federman and Julia Frankel in Jerusalem, Sarah El Deeb in Beirut and Farnoush Amiri in New York contributed to this report.





Source link

Top Stories

US military to continue targeting vessels belonging to alleged Venezuelan drug cartels, Rubio warns – live | Trump administration

Published

on


Judge sides with Harvard and orders Trump to reverse funding cuts

A federal judge in Boston has sided with Harvard university in its court battle with the Trump administration, ordering that the federal government reverse funding cuts, the AP reports.

The Trump administration had cut more than $2.6bn in research grants to the school as part of the president’s aggressive attacks on academic institutions.

Judge Allison Burroughs ruled Wednesday the cuts constituted illegal retaliation after Harvard had refused the White House’s demands to change its policies and governance, the AP reported.

Harvard’s complaint, filed in July, said:

This case involves the government’s efforts to use the withholding of federal funding as leverage to gain control of academic decisionmaking at Harvard. All told, the tradeoff put to Harvard and other universities is clear: allow the government to micromanage your academic institution or jeopardize the institution’s ability to pursue medical breakthroughs, scientific discoveries, and innovative solutions.

Key events

Federal agents reportedly practicing crowd control in Chicago

Hundreds of federal agents are arriving to the Chicago area for Donald Trump’s deployment, with some already “practicing crowd control with shields and flash-bang grenades”, according to a new report in the Chicago Sun-Times.

Roughly 230 agents, some who work for US Customs and Border Protection (CBP), are arriving from Los Angeles, the newspaper reported, with at least 30 of them training at a naval station near north Chicago.

JB Pritzker, Illinois’ Democratic governor, has strongly condemned the deployment, which the president has claimed is meant to address crime. “Any kind of troops on the streets of an American city don’t belong unless there is an insurrection, unless there is truly an emergency. There is not,” the governor said on Sunday. “I’m going to do everything I can to stop him from taking away people’s rights and from using the military to invade states. I think it’s very important for us all to stand up.”

More than 100 unmarked vehicles have been sent to the Navy training station, the Sun-Times reported.

The deployment of troops and other federal agents in LA caused widespread outrage and protests. Some demonstrations were met with teargas and other munitions. Border patrol agents with CBP were also accused of injuring protesters in LA and were found to have made false statements about demonstrators they arrested.





Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

Harvard funding freeze by Trump administration reversed by judge

Published

on


Cambridge, MA – May 29: Law school graduates raise gavels during Harvard University’s 374th Commencement on May 29, 2025.

Craig F. Walker | Boston Globe | Getty Images

A federal judge on Wednesday ruled that the Trump administration’s freeze of $2.2 billion in grant funds for Harvard University over concerns about antisemitism on campus and other issues was illegal.

Judge Allison Burroughs agreed with Harvard’s arguments that the administration imposed the funding freeze in retaliation for the Ivy League university’s refusal to capitulate to demands for reforms that violated First Amendment protections under the Constitution.

Burroughs’ ruling in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts vacates freezing orders affecting Harvard and bars anyone in the Trump administration from enforcing those orders.

The administration froze the grants to Harvard on April 14, hours after the university flatly rejected demands that it end its diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, and screen international students for ideological biases, including antisemitism.

“The fact that Defendants’ swift and sudden decision to terminate funding, ostensibly motivated by antisemitism, was made before they learned anything about antisemitism on campus or what was being done in response, leads the Court to conclude that the sudden focus on antisemitism was, at best … arbitrary and, at worst, pretextual,” Burroughs wrote in her ruling.

She also noted that the administration, in a letter in Apri,l “specifically conditioned funding on agreeing to its ten terms, only one of which related to antisemitism, while six related to ideological and pedagogical concerns, including who may lead and teach at Harvard, who may be admitted, and what may be taught.”

Read more CNBC politics coverage

Harvard President Alan Garber at the time of the funding freeze said in a note to the university community, “No government — regardless of which party is in power — should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.”

CNBC has requested comment on the ruling from Harvard and the White House.

This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

Kawhi Leonard, Clippers used endorsement deal to ‘circumvent’ NBA salary cap: Report

Published

on


Kawhi Leonard allegedly received a lucrative, no-work contract from a now-bankrupt environmental company with direct ties to his team, the LA Clippers, and franchise owner Steve Ballmer so that he could be paid more money without it counting against the NBA’s salary rules, according to accusations made by former employees of the firm to a podcast.

In the latest episode of the “Pablo Torre Finds Out” podcast, which was released Wednesday morning, seven anonymous former employees for San Francisco-based Aspiration, an environmental start-up company partly funded by a $50 million investment from Clippers owner Steve Ballmer, said the four-year, $28 million endorsement deal Leonard received in 2022 was for a “no-show job” intended to “circumvent the (NBA) salary cap.”

“We went through a litany of really, really top-tier name contracts, and then (someone would say), ‘Oh, by the way, we also have a marketing deal with Kawhi Leonard, like a $28 million organic marketing sponsorship deal with Kawhi,’” a person described as a former financial official for Aspiration said on the Torre podcast. “And (they’d say) that if I had any questions about it, essentially don’t (ask), because it was to ‘circumvent the salary cap. LOL.’ There was lots of LOL when things were shared.”

The NBA is “aware of this morning’s media report regarding the LA Clippers and are commencing an investigation,” league spokesman Mike Bass told The Athletic on Wednesday afternoon.

Messages left for Leonard’s business partners were not immediately returned.

The Clippers’ communications team sent the following statement to The Athletic: “Neither Mr. Ballmer nor the Clippers circumvented the salary-cap or engaged in any misconduct related to Aspiration.  Any contrary assertion is provably false: The team ended its relationship with Aspiration years ago, during the 2022-23 season, when Aspiration defaulted on its obligations.  Neither the Clippers nor Mr. Ballmer was aware of any improper activity by Aspiration or its co-founder until after the government instituted its investigation. The team and Mr. Ballmer stand ready to assist law enforcement in any way they can.”

This is the second time in Leonard’s six seasons with the Clippers that accusations have surfaced suggesting he and his business representatives sought improper payments.

According to a 2019 report by The Athletic, the NBA conducted a formal investigation of complaints that Leonard’s uncle and chief business partner, Dennis Robertson, had asked for improper benefits from multiple teams when Leonard was a free agent that summer. Sources at the time said Robertson asked team officials for part ownership of the team, a private plane that would be available at all times, a house and a guaranteed amount of off-court endorsement money that they could expect if Leonard played for their team. League sources with knowledge of that investigation said no evidence was found indicating that the Clippers — who ultimately landed Leonard on a three-year, $103 million contract in the summer of 2019 — had granted any of the lavish requests, but Silver said if further evidence surfaced the league would re-open its investigation.

Teams and players found by the league to have illegally circumvented the salary cap are subject to fines, loss of draft picks, and even suspensions, as well as the voiding of player contracts. In 2000, the NBA punished the Minnesota Timberwolves and Joe Smith for circumventing the salary cap through a series of one-year deals with the promise of a longer, much richer contract afterwards. Then-commissioner David Stern fined the team $3.5 million, took away five future first-round picks, and suspended then-team owner Glen Taylor and then-chief basketball executive Kevin McHale for a year. Stern also voided all of Smith’s one-year contracts with the Timberwolves, which prevented him from being eligible for the $86 million contract he was to get from the team.

Ballmer is the richest owner in the NBA, with a personal fortune of $153 billion, according to Forbes. Additionally, Ballmer’s Intuit Dome is the host for the 2026 NBA All-Star Game, as well as the basketball tournament site for the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles.

Four summers before the Leonard-related accusations in the summer of 2019, Ballmer’s alleged handling of a player’s off-court finances first drew the attention of the league office. The Clippers were fined $250,000 in August 2015 relating to the free agency of big man DeAndre Jordan. The league found that the Clippers included a third-party endorsement deal in their pitch to Jordan in the form of a contract with Lexus that would have reportedly paid him $200,000 annually.

It is unknown if Ballmer was aware of the employment agreement between Aspiration and Leonard and what role, if any, that Ballmer played in facilitating the relationship between the environmental start-up and his star player.

Aspiration was a “green bank” that promised to supply carbon credits and plant trees to offset its clients’ carbon emissions. It filed for bankruptcy protection in March after its co-founder, Joe Sanberg, was arrested on charges of wire fraud. Sanberg pleaded guilty last month to defrauding investors of $248 million.

In publicly available bankruptcy filings reviewed by The Athletic, Aspiration’s three largest creditors listed are the Clippers, who say they are owed $30 million by the environmental firm; Forum Entertainment (also owned by Ballmer, claiming it is owed a debt of $11 million); and Leonard’s personal limited liability company, “KL2 Aspire,” claiming a debt of $7 million.

But the Torre podcast, which claims to have reviewed Aspiration’s internal emails and contracts with Ballmer and Leonard, said Ballmer agreed to wire $50 million to the start-up company in September 2021, a month after Leonard signed a team-friendly, four-year, $176 million contract extension with the Clippers. Just weeks after Ballmer agreed to wire the money, the Clippers announced Aspiration as its team sponsor in a 23-year, $300 million deal.

Leonard registered his limited liability company in November 2021 and, according to the podcast, his $28 million contract with Aspiration took effect in April 2022. He could have signed a shorter contract with the Clippers in 2021 that would have allowed him to become a free agent again in 2022 — when he would have been eligible for a $235 million contract. So the four-year deal he agreed to with the Clippers gave the team financial flexibility against the salary cap, as well as the security of knowing their best player was under contract for years.

Leonard again signed a team-friendly deal with the Clippers in January 2024, a three-year, $153 million contract for less money (about $70 million) than he could have earned. The deal was framed as allowing the Clippers to have the financial flexibility to potentially re-sign fellow stars James Harden and Paul George.

According to the Torre podcast, language in Leonard’s endorsement contract with Aspiration gave him “the exclusive right to control and approve all content and distribution,” and gave Aspiration the right to terminate the contract “if Leonard is no longer an employee of the [Clippers] for any reason.”

Additionally, the Torre podcast said, there is no evidence of social media posts, photographs or appearances by Leonard promoting Aspiration, as stipulated in the contract. However, The Athletic found at least one social media post from the Clippers tagging Aspiration and referencing Leonard. (The team did the same for several other players without known ties to Aspiration, and Leonard did not retweet the post.)

 

“(Leonard) didn’t have to do anything,” the former finance department official at Aspiration, said on the Torre podcast. “Uncle Dennis demanded payment. It was priority one. It was something that had to be done, and it was crucial to our relationships with Ballmer and the Clippers.”

Robertson, Leonard’s uncle, is listed as the “designated representative” on the contract with Aspiration, according to Torre’s podcast. Messages left for Robertson by The Athletic were not returned.

Per Section 3 of Article XIII, which details the ‘Penalties’ within the section that covers salary cap circumvention, any team that violates league rules for a first time, as well as the player, could face the following outcomes (after their case goes to an Appeals Panel).

  • A fine of up to $7.5 million.
  • The “direct forfeiture of draft picks.”
  • The voiding of the player’s contract, “or any Renegotiation, Extension, or amendment of a Player Contract, between such player and such Team.”
  • A fine of up to $350,000 for the player.
  • A suspension for up to one year for “any Team personnel found to have willfully engaged in such violation.”
  • The voiding of any transaction or agreement found to have violated league rules, and the forced forfeiture of funds received in the deal “unless the player establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that he was unaware of the violation.”

“Pablo Torre Finds out” is an independently produced show licensed by The Athletic and distributed on its podcast network. The Torre podcast signed a licensing agreement with The Athletic Podcast Network last month and the episode released Wednesday is the first under the new partnership.

Law Murray contributed reporting.

(Photo: Ron Chenoy / Imagn Images)





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending