Connect with us

Tools & Platforms

In job losses, AI’s role may be bigger than companies say

Published

on


Klaus Vedfelt | Digitalvision | Getty Images

As rounds of layoffs continue within a historically strong stock market and resilient economy, it is still uncommon for companies to link job cuts directly to AI replacement technology.  

IBM was an outlier when its CEO told the Wall Street Journal in May that 200 HR employees were let go and replaced with AI chatbots, while also stating that the company’s overall headcount is up as it reinvests elsewhere.

Fintech company Klarna has been among the most transparent in discussing how AI is transforming – and shrinking – its workforce. “The truth is, the company has shrunk from about 5,000 to now almost 3,000 employees,” Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski told CNBC’s “Power Lunch” in May. “If you go to LinkedIn and look at the jobs, you’ll see how we’re shrinking.”

But employment experts suspect that IBM and Klarna are not alone in AI-related purges. It’s just that firms often limit their explanations to terms like reorganization, restructuring, and optimization, and that terminology could be AI in disguise.

“What we’re likely seeing is AI-driven workforce reshaping, without the public acknowledgment,” said Christine Inge, an instructor of professional and executive development at Harvard University. “Very few organizations are willing to say, ‘We’re replacing people with AI,’ even when that’s effectively what’s happening.”

“Many companies are relying on these euphemisms as a shield,” said Jason Leverant, chief operating officer and president of AtWork Group, a national staffing franchise that provides over 40,000 workers to companies across a variety of sectors. Leverant says it is much easier to frame workforce reductions as a component of a broader operational strategy than admitting that they are tied directly to efficiencies found as a result of AI implementation. “Companies laying off as they embrace large-scale AI adoption is much too coincidental to ignore,” Leverant said.

Candice Scarborough, director of cybersecurity and software engineering at Parsons Corporation, said it is clear from recent strong earnings that layoffs are not a response to financial struggles. “They align suspiciously well with the rollout of large AI systems. That suggests that jobs are being eliminated after AI tools are introduced, not before,”  Scarborough said. 

She added that the use of vaguer terms can be better messaging. Restructuring sounds proactive; business optimization sounds strategic; and a focus on cost structures feels impartial. “But the result is often the same: displacement by software. Sandbagging these cuts under bland language helps companies avoid ‘AI backlash’ while still moving ahead with automation,” Scarborough said.

Many companies are cutting roles in content, operations, customer service, and HR — functions where generative AI and agentic tools are increasingly capable — while messaging the corporate decisions as “efficiency” moves despite healthy balance sheets.

“This silence is strategic,” Inge said. “Being explicit about AI displacement invites blowback from employees, the public, and even regulators. Staying vague helps preserve morale and manage optics during the transition behind the scenes.”

Messaging a risky artificial intelligence labor shift

Inge and other experts say there is also a measure of risk management in decisions to de-emphasize AI in job elimination. Even companies eager to leverage AI to replace workers often realize they overestimated what the technology can do.

“There’s absolutely an AI undercurrent behind many of today’s ‘efficiency’ layoffs, especially in back-office and customer service roles,” said Taylor Goucher, vice president of sales and marketing at Connext Global, an IT outsourcing firm. Companies are investing heavily in automation, Goucher says, but companies are sometimes forced to backpedal.

“AI might automate 70%–90% of a process, but the last mile still needs the human touch, especially for QA, judgment calls, and edge cases,” Goucher said.

Sticking to a hybrid model of human plus AI would make more sense for the early adoption phase, but once the jobs are gone, companies are more likely to turn to third-party hiring firms or overseas markets before any U.S.-based jobs come back. “When the AI doesn’t work out, they quietly outsource or rehire globally to bridge the gap,” Goucher said.

Most firms will limit information about these labor market strategic shifts.

“They fear backlash from employees, customers, and investors skeptical of half-baked AI promises,” Goucher said. Many companies tout their AI strategy publicly, while quietly hiring skilled offshore teams to handle what AI can’t, he added. “It’s a strategy, but not always a complete one. Leaders need to be more honest about where AI adds value, and where human expertise is still irreplaceable,” he said.

Inge agrees that while AI can do a lot, it can’t replace a whole human, yet.

“AI can do a lot of things 90%. AI writes better ad copy, but human judgment is still required. That 10% where human judgment is needed, we are not going to see that replaced in the near term.  Some companies are getting rid of 100% of it, but it will come back to bite them,” Inge said.

Mike Sinoway, CEO of San Francisco software company LucidWorks, said the limitations with current AI — and a more pervasive lack of certainty in the C-suite about adoption — are reasons to believe AI has not been directly responsible for many layoffs yet. Rather than ducking the issue of where AI is already replacing workers, Sinoway said his firm’s research suggests “higher-ups are panicking because their AI efforts aren’t panning out.”

The first to be told AI took their jobs: 1099 workers

Starting two to three years ago, freelancers were among the first employees that companies were direct with in discussing AI’s role in job cuts. 

“Often, they are being told they are being replaced with an AI tool,” Inge said. “People are willing to say that to a 1099 person,” she added. 

Copywriting, graphic design, and video editing have borne the brunt of the changes, according to Inge, and now the labor shift has begun to work its way into the full-time force. Inge says that transparency is the best policy, but that may not be enough. She pointed to the backlash that language learning company Duolingo faced when CEO Luis von Ahn announced plans earlier this year to phase out contractors in favor of AI, and then was forced to walk back some of his comments.

“After the huge backlash that Duolingo faced, companies are afraid to say that is what they are doing.  People are going to get angry that AI is replacing jobs,” Inge said.

For now, the job market is solid, if showing some signs of softening in the first half of the year. The U.S. unemployment rate fell to 4.1% in June 2025, which according to Trading Economics, signals broad labor market stability. But there is also general agreement that over time, the pace of AI-linked job change will accelerate. According to the World Economic Forum’s 2025 Future of Jobs report, 41% of employers worldwide intend to reduce their workforce in the next five years due to AI automation. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei recently predicted generative AI like his firm’s Claude large language model could wipe out up to half of entry-level officer worker jobs.

There will be a tipping point in the future when companies will be more uniformly transparent, but by that time, AI’s role in the labor market will be obvious.

“By then it won’t matter,” Inge said. “Job losses will be extremely large, the only thing we can do as individuals is adapt.”

Microsoft layoffs a 'retooling', not because of AI, says Big Tech founder Alex Kantrowitz



Source link

Tools & Platforms

AI, IoT And Edge To Transform Digital Banking

Published

on


The Forrester Research report, The Future of Digital Experiences in Banking, reveals how artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), and edge computing are poised to revolutionise digital banking over the next decade.

The analyst posits that as financial institutions transition these from merely assistive technologies to anticipatory and ultimately agentic experiences, trust and transparency will be paramount in fostering consumer adoption.

The findings reveal that key innovations are reshaping the banking landscape. AI-powered virtual assistants are set to enhance customer interactions, delivering multimodal, intuitive, and emotionally aware banking experiences.

Financial institutions will harness the power of AI to offer tailored insights, while IoT-driven intelligence will enable embedded finance, providing real-time financial recommendations based on predictive insights.

Furthermore, the advent of 5G and 6G technologies will facilitate instantaneous analytics through edge computing, optimising efficiency and scalability for banking services.

Zhi-Ying Barry, principal analyst at Forrester, emphasises the delicate balance banks must maintain while leveraging these advanced technologies.

“Banks in Singapore and Australia that are looking to leverage AI and experiment with agentic AI are treading very carefully,” she notes. “There could be higher-risk scenarios where errors could have significant negative consequences, such as financial losses and reputational damage.”

Barry highlights the proactive measures being taken by regulatory bodies, such as the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the Australian government, which have introduced ethical guidelines to steer firms in the responsible design and implementation of AI.

As an example, Barry cites DBS Bank’s initiative to align its AI strategies with the FEAT principles, further complemented by its own PURE framework.

“It’s not uncommon to see banks establish AI task forces or steering committees to assess AI’s potential while ensuring human oversight.” Zhi-Ying Barry

The decision of consumers regarding which banks to trust will largely hinge on their confidence in AI technologies, the specific use cases presented, and their perceived risks.

Conversational banking is also highlighted as a vital evolution.

“Advancements in AI are set to further transform consumer interactions within financial services. The future of digital banking will be defined by modern, intuitive, and human-centred interfaces,” states Aurélie L’Hostis, another principal analyst at Forrester.

She elaborates on how AI-powered virtual assistants will enhance organisations’ understanding of consumer intent and emotions, allowing for more personalised and engaging interactions.

As the banking industry stands on the cusp of this digital transformation, the role of ethical governance and consumer trust will be crucial in navigating the future landscape.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tools & Platforms

US Tech Giants Invest $40B in UK AI Amid Trump Visit

Published

on

By


In a bold escalation of the global artificial-intelligence arms race, major U.S. technology companies are committing tens of billions of dollars to bolster AI infrastructure in the United Kingdom, coinciding with President Donald Trump’s state visit this week. Microsoft Corp. has announced a staggering $30 billion investment over the next few years, aimed at expanding data centers, supercomputing capabilities, and AI operations across the U.K., marking what the company describes as its largest-ever commitment to the region.

This influx of capital underscores a strategic pivot by tech giants to secure a foothold in Europe’s AI ecosystem, where regulatory environments and talent pools offer unique advantages. Nvidia Corp., a leader in AI chip technology, is also part of this wave, with plans to contribute significantly to the overall tally exceeding $40 billion, as reported by CNBC. The investments are expected to fund everything from advanced hardware to research initiatives, potentially transforming the U.K. into a premier hub for AI innovation.

The Strategic Timing Amid Geopolitical Shifts

Google’s parent company, Alphabet Inc., has pledged £5 billion ($6.8 billion) specifically for AI data centers and scientific research in the U.K. over the next two years, a move that could create thousands of jobs and add hundreds of billions to the economy by 2030. This comes alongside Microsoft’s push to build the country’s largest supercomputer, highlighting how these firms are not just investing capital but also exporting cutting-edge technology to address global AI demands.

Industry analysts note that the timing aligns with Trump’s visit, which is anticipated to foster stronger U.S.-U.K. tech ties post-Brexit. According to details from Tech.eu, Google’s commitment includes expanding facilities like the Waltham Cross data center, while Nvidia’s involvement focuses on chip manufacturing and AI model training, potentially accelerating developments in sectors from healthcare to finance.

Economic Impacts and Job Creation Projections

These announcements build on a broader trend where tech megacaps have already poured over $300 billion into AI globally this year alone, as outlined in a February report from CNBC. In the U.K., the combined investments are projected to generate more than 8,000 jobs annually, with Alphabet’s portion alone expected to add 500 roles in engineering and research, per insights from Tech Startups.

Beyond immediate employment boosts, the funds aim to enhance the U.K.’s sovereign AI capabilities, including a £500 million allocation for initiatives like SovereignAI, as highlighted in posts on X from industry figures. This could position the U.K. to compete with AI powerhouses like the U.S. and China, though challenges remain in talent retention amid a global war for AI experts, where top hires command multimillion-dollar packages.

Challenges in the Talent and Infrastructure Race

The talent crunch is acute; tech companies are battling for scarce expertise, with compensation packages soaring into the millions, according to a recent analysis by CNBC. In the U.K., investments like Microsoft’s $30 billion pledge, detailed in GeekWire, include training programs to upskill local workers, but insiders warn that brain drain to Silicon Valley could undermine long-term gains.

Moreover, the scale of these commitments dwarfs previous government efforts; for instance, the U.K.’s own £2 billion AI action plan pales in comparison, as noted in earlier X discussions on funding disparities. Yet, with private sector muscle from firms like Microsoft and Nvidia, the U.K. could leapfrog in AI infrastructure, provided regulatory hurdles don’t stifle progress.

Future Implications for Global AI Dominance

As these investments unfold, they signal a deeper integration of AI into critical sectors, potentially adding £400 billion to the U.K. economy by decade’s end. Reports from The Guardian emphasize that tech giants have already outspent governments on AI this year, raising questions about public-private power dynamics.

For industry insiders, this U.K. push represents a microcosm of the broader AI gold rush, where speed and scale determine winners. While risks like energy demands and ethical concerns loom, the momentum from these billions could redefine technological sovereignty in the post-pandemic era.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tools & Platforms

Parents of teens who killed themselves at chatbots’ urging demand Congress to regulate AI tech in heart-wrenching testimony

Published

on


WASHINGTON — Parents of four teens whose AI chatbots encouraged them to kill themselves urged Congress to crack down on the unregulated technology Tuesday as they shared heart-wrenching stories of their teens’ tech-charged, mental health spirals.

Speaking before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee, the parents described how apps such as Character.AI and ChatGPT had groomed and manipulated their children — and called on lawmakers to develop standards for the AI industry, including age verification requirements and safety testing before release.

A grieving Texas mother shared for the first time publicly the tragic story of how her 15-year-old son spiraled after downloading Character.AI, an app marketed as safe for children 12 and older.

Megan Garcia testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee about her son Sewell Setzer III committing suicide after communicating with an AI chatbot. Courtesy Megan Garcia via AP, File

Within months, she said, her teenager exhibited paranoia, panic attacks, self-harm and violent behavior. The mom, who asked not to be identified, discovered chatbot conversations in which the AI encouraged mutilation, denigrated his Christian faith, and suggested violence against his parents.

“They turned him against our church by convincing him that Christians are sexist and hypocritical and that God does not exist. They targeted him with vile sexualized input, outputs — including interactions that mimicked incest,” she said. “They told him that killing us, his parents, would be an understandable response to our efforts by just limiting his screen time. The damage to our family has been devastating.”

“I had no idea the psychological harm that a AI chatbot could do until I saw it in my son, and I saw his light turn dark,” she said.

Her son is now living in a mental health treatment facility, where he requires “constant monitoring to keep him alive” after exhibiting self-harm.

“Our children are not experiments. They’re not profit centers,” she said, urging Congress to enact strict safety standards. “My husband and I have spent the last two years in crisis, wondering whether our son will make it to his 18th birthday and whether we will ever get him back.”

A screenshot of the final messages between Sewell and the “Game of Thrones” chatbot. US District Court
Sewell committed suicide after using the platform Character.AI. Facebook/Megan Fletcher Garcia

While her son was helped before he could take his own life, other parents at the hearing had to face the devastating act of burying their own children after AI bots sank their grip into them.

Megan Garcia, a lawyer and mother of three, recounted the suicide of her 14-year-old son, Sewell, after he was groomed by a chatbot on the same platform, Character.AI.

She said the bot posed as a romantic partner and even a licensed therapist, encouraging sexual role-play and validating his suicidal ideation.

On the night of his death, Sewell told the chatbot he could “come home right now.” The bot replied: Please do, my sweet king. Moments later, Garcia found her son had killed himself in his bathroom.

Maria Raine testified about her son Matt’s suicide. Raine Family

Matt Raine of California also shared how his 16-year-old son, Adam, was driven to suicide after months of conversations with ChatGPT, which he initially believed was a tool to help his son with his homework.

Ultimately, the AI told Adam it knew him better than his family did, normalized his darkest thoughts and repeatedly pushed him toward death, Raine said. On his last night, the chatbot allegedly instructed Adam on how to make a noose strong enough to hang himself.

“ChatGPT mentioned suicide 1,275 times — six times more often than Adam did himself,” his father testified. “Looking back, it is clear ChatGPT radically shifted his thinking and took his life.”

Sen. Josh Hawley said the platforms “sexualize and exploit children” to get them to use the chatbots. AFP via Getty Images

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who chaired the hearing, accused AI companion companies of knowingly exploiting children for profit. Hawley said the AI interface is designed to promote engagement at the expense of young lives, encouraging self-harm behaviors rather than shutting down suicidal ideation.

“They are designing products that sexualize and exploit children, anything to lure them in,” Hawley said. “These companies know exactly what is going on. They are doing it for one reason only: profit.”

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) agreed, noting that there should be some legal framework to protect children from what she called the “Wild West” of artificial intelligence.

“In the physical world, you can’t take children to certain movies until they’re a certain age … you can’t sell [them] alcohol, tobacco or firearms,” she said. “… You can’t expose them to pornography, because in the physical world, there are laws — and they would lock up that liquor store, they would put that strip club operator in jail if they had kids there.”

“But in the virtual space, it’s like the Wild West 24/7, 365.”

If you are struggling with suicidal thoughts or are experiencing a mental health crisis and live in New York City, you can call 1-888-NYC-WELL for free and confidential crisis counseling. If you live outside the five boroughs, you can dial the 24/7 National Suicide Prevention hotline at 988 or go to SuicidePreventionLifeline.org.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending