Connect with us

Education

What it really takes to lead successful grading reform

Published

on


This post originally appeared on the Otus blog and is republished here with permission.

Grading reform is messy, but it’s worth it.

That was the central message from Jessica Espinoza and Alice Opperman of Emerson Public Schools (NJ), who shared their decade-long journey implementing standards-based grading during their session at ISTELive+ASCD 2025. 

What started as a deeply rooted effort to promote equity has grown into a districtwide, cross-curricular system that blends teacher voice, clarity for families, and support from the right tools.

Here’s what they learned along the way, and why they’re still learning.

huge takeaways for school leaders considering a shift to SBG

Clarity starts with fewer, better standards

In the early stages of their grading reform, Emerson tried to be comprehensive; too comprehensive, perhaps. Their first report card included nearly every New Jersey Common Core standard, which quickly became overwhelming for both teachers and families. Over time, they shifted to focusing on broader, more meaningful standards that better reflected student learning.

“So approximately 10 years ago, we started with a standard-based report card in grades K-6. Our report card at that time listed pretty much every standard we could think of. We realized that we really needed to narrow in on more umbrella standards or standards that really encapsulate the whole idea. We took away this larger report card with 50 different standards, and we went into something that was more streamlined. That really helped our teachers to focus their energy on what is really important for our students.” 
–Jessica Espinoza, Principal, Emerson Public Schools (NJ)

Lasting change doesn’t happen without teacher buy-in

Grading reform can’t succeed unless educators believe in it. That’s why Emerson made intentional space for teacher voice throughout the process; through pilots, surveys, honest conversations, and, most importantly, time. The district embraced a long-term mindset, giving teachers flexibility to experiment, reflect, and gradually evolve their practices instead of expecting instant transformation.

“We had some consultants sit with teams of teachers to work on these common scoring criteria. They were fully designed by teachers, and their colleagues had the chance to weigh in during the school year so that it didn’t feel quite so top-down…the teachers had such a voice in making them that it didn’t feel like we were taking their autonomy away.”
–Alice Opperman, Director of Curriculum, Instruction & Technology, Emerson Public Schools (NJ)

Progress means nothing if families can’t follow it

Even with teachers aligned and systems in place, Emerson found that family understanding was key to making SBG truly work. While the district initially aimed to move away from traditional letter grades altogether, ongoing conversations with parents led to a reevaluation. By listening to families and adapting their approach, Emerson has found a middle ground, one that preserves the value of standards-based learning while making progress easier for families to understand.

“Five years ago, I would have said, ‘We will be totally done with points. We will never see a letter grade again. It’s going to be so much better.’ But talking to parent after parent has led us to this compromised place where we are going to try it a little bit differently to give the parents what they need in order to understand us, but also keep that proficiency, competency, mastery information that we feel is so valuable as educators.” 
–Alice Opperman, Director of Curriculum, Instruction & Technology, Emerson Public Schools (NJ)

Still evolving, and that’s the point

For Jessica and Alice, grading reform has never been about arriving at a perfect system (and certainly not achieving it overnight). It’s been about listening, learning, and improving year after year. Their message to other school leaders? There’s no one “right” way to do SBG, but there is a thoughtful, collaborative way forward.

Emerson’s story shows that when you prioritize clarity, trust your teachers, and bring families into the conversation, the result isn’t just a better report card. 

It’s a better learning experience for everyone involved.

How the right grading solution supports Emerson’s SBG efforts

Emerson put in the work, but sustaining grading reform at scale is nearly impossible without the right tools to support teachers, track progress, and communicate effectively with families.

  • Streamlined standards
    Focus on the standards that matter most by building custom, district-aligned grading scales. The right platform makes it easy to group standards, apply scoring criteria, and visualize mastery over time.
  • Transparent communication
    Share clear, standards-aligned feedback with families directly in a platform. Teachers can provide timely updates, rubric explanations, and progress reports, all in one place.
  • Flexible grading tools
    Support teacher autonomy with multiple assessment types and scoring options, including points, rubrics, and mastery levels, all aligned to district-defined standards.

For more news on grading reform, visit eSN’s Educational Leadership hub.

Latest posts by eSchool Media Contributors (see all)





Source link

Education

Back 2 School: Local districts experimenting with AI learning tools in the classroom – WGRZ

Published

on



Back 2 School: Local districts experimenting with AI learning tools in the classroom  WGRZ



Source link

Continue Reading

Education

The Need for AI Literacy in Indian Legal Education

Published

on


Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the contemporary landscape, harnessing the power of vast datasets to automate complex tasks and deliver tailored solutions. This transformative technology is reshaping our approach to longstanding challenges. India is at the leading edge of this AI evolution, ready to use the rapid technological progress to achieve remarkable growth in technology.

Legal education serves as the cornerstone for promoting social justice, equity, and a robust democracy, providing individuals with the expertise to navigate a society regulated by law. To accomplish this objective, society must cultivate proficient lawyers who serve essential functions within their communities. This necessitates a comprehensive framework that enables legal practitioners to address the changing demands of Indian society.

The obstacles presented by globalization, rising expenses, and ongoing judicial delays highlight the urgent necessity for technological advancement in the legal field. India’s dedication to Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG4) established in 2015, which prioritizes accessible and equitable quality education, corresponds with the National Education Policy 2020s objective to modernize legal education. By embracing global norms and new methodologies, the legal industry may markedly improve access to justice, safeguarding it as a fundamental right for all individuals.

After India’s independence in 1947, education was vital in fulfilling the moral needs of the newly liberated population. And, the main goal of the legal system was to realize the Constitution’s objectives, leading to the enactment of various laws for social reform, such as the Dowry Prohibition Act (1961) and the Hindu Marriage Act (1955). Today, India’s educational aim is to create a fair and just society. The Indian court system is struggling with a backlog of cases, corruption, and slow resolution times. The Supreme Court highlighted the importance of improving legal education to tackle these challenges and adapt to new global trends, advocating for the use of AI in the courts.

India’s current legal education and research framework is based on the common law tradition, and emphasizes upon critical thinking, teaching using Socratic methods, legal writing skills, oral advocacy, risk aversion, issue identification, and legal ethics. Although, these strategies have shaped generations of competent lawyers, yet they are now regarded as insufficient. Because, it places greater importance on theoretical understanding rather than on the practical abilities that are essential for contemporary legal practice. Lawyers are now anticipated to possess strong analytical skills and be proficient in utilizing legal technologies such as document automation and predictive analytics.

The expectations for newly graduated lawyers have changed considerably. They are now required to have robust technological skills, adaptability, and the capability to work alongside professionals from different fields, in addition to their conventional responsibilities in legal research and advocacy. Clients today look for legal professionals who can serve as strategic partners, grasping the connections between law, technology, and business. In this context, it is crucial for legal educators to integrate frameworks that align technical comprehension of AI with ethical and practical training. This method guarantees that students are prepared not just to use AI tools, but also to evaluate their results critically.

Consequently, the traditional method of legal education requires the implementation of more flexible and tailored curricula to tackle the growing complexities of legal matters in a rapidly globalizing and digital environment.

There is a notable trend towards incorporating AI literacy in various legal fields, prompting many law schools worldwide to either introduce or revise their AI courses introducing new courses centred around AI, such as Programming for Lawyers, AI Ethics and Privacy, AI and Experiential Learning etc. The National Law University of India in Bengaluru, OP Jindal University in Sonipat, and the Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Rights in IIT Kharagpur have incorporated AI-focused courses into their curriculum. This initiative aims to equip students with the skills to utilize AI tools, addressing the technological needs of the profession, also understanding AI technologies can improve their job security and enhance their competitiveness in an ever evolving industry. Legal firms and experienced lawyers may expect younger associates to leverage generative AI technologies, given their familiarity with the changing tech landscape. AI will not replace lawyers; instead, those who adopt AI will likely excel over those who do not. An AI-focused curriculum can help cultivate lawyers who are less susceptible to being replaced. It is essential for students to not only learn how to use AI tools effectively but also to receive guidance on their optimal application.

While coding skills aren’t a requirement for lawyers but familiarize themselves with tools and platforms that are beneficial in the legal sector. Legal professionals can utilize these tools to streamline contract automation, conduct legal research, and monitor compliance effectively. This not only makes it easier to do analyses of vast datasets, automating complex tasks, providing customized solutions and uncover different interpretations of laws across jurisdictions, and can also assist judges with routine tasks which will allow them to focus on more complex issues.

The incorporation of AI into legal education is essential to meet the growing need for faster, more accurate, and accessible legal services. AI’s ability to perform tasks in seconds that traditionally take much longer necessitates a thorough overhaul of the legal curriculum to embrace digital advancements. Law schools in India are grappling with a pressing challenge such as outdated curriculum, many teachers are not well-versed in data science, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. This gap in knowledge, coupled with a resistance to shift from traditional teaching methods, hampers the integration of these technologies into legal education. Furthermore, the current infrastructure is inadequate for overseeing AI usage, as there are no clear guidelines for its proper application.

The Bar Council of India (BCI) is responsible for regulating legal education in India, established under the Advocates Act of 1961. The BCI’s primary role is to supervise the legal profession, ensuring lawyers adhere to professional conduct standards and safeguard the profession’s interests. Over time, the BCI’s mandate has expanded to include establishing standards for law colleges, including curriculum, infrastructure, faculty qualifications, and student admissions. This standardization ensures quality but limits the capacity of law schools to innovate and experiment with new approaches. Many law programs follow a strict curriculum, limiting opportunities for integrating innovative interdisciplinary subjects. The BCI has released a directive promoting the incorporation of subjects like blockchains, electronic discovery, cyber-security, robotics, artificial intelligence, and bio-ethics into curricula. However, law schools in India have neglected to integrate AI into their curricula, as the existing curriculum is extensive. Educators often shy away from integrating new technology in their classrooms due to the extra workload it entails. Even with access to labs and advanced tools, many schools struggle to deliver up-to-date, AI-enhanced learning materials. This gap arises from a lack of staff expertise in utilizing AI effectively, leaving students without the benefits of modern educational resources.

Ensuring digital inclusion is crucial for the sustainable integration of AI, as it ensures fair access to digital tools and resources for all students, regardless of their socioeconomic status or geographic location. Students enrolled in law colleges located in rural or semi-urban regions may experience a disadvantage in accessing technology and education in artificial intelligence relative to their metropolitan counterparts. Elite educational institutions and communities often have sophisticated digital infrastructures, such as high-speed internet, modern gadgets, and cloud computing resources, allowing them to adopt cutting-edge EdTech solutions.

Law schools in economically disadvantaged or rural regions encounter difficulties stemming from obsolete gear, unreliable internet connectivity, or a total absence of access to AI resources. The prevalence of AI materials and technologies in English constitutes a substantial obstacle to accessibility for non-English speaking students.

In addition to revising the curriculum to incorporate AI subjects, it is equally crucial to train the faculty and staff. This ensures that students are well-informed about the effective use of AI, fostering a sense of comfort and confidence. Such an approach is vital for achieving optimal outcomes in education and beyond.



Linkedin


Disclaimer

Views expressed above are the author’s own.



END OF ARTICLE





Source link

Continue Reading

Education

First lady calls AI training a national responsibility for US students

Published

on


First Lady Melania Trump has urged the nation’s business and technology leaders to back artificial intelligence (AI) education in schools, framing it as essential for preparing children for future jobs, reported India Today

White House Task Force on AI education

Speaking at the inaugural meeting of the Artificial Intelligence Education Task Force, which she chairs, Trump balanced optimism with caution. “As leaders and parents, we must manage AI’s growth responsibly. During this primitive stage, it is our duty to treat AI as we would our own children — empowering, but with watchful guidance,” she said.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon joined the event, alongside Cabinet officials and industry leaders. Trump pressed the group to invest in AI training for schoolchildren, describing it as a national responsibility. “AI can be a powerful tool, but only if we teach our young people how to use it with wisdom,” she noted.

National contest and call for leadership

The First Lady also highlighted her recently launched nationwide contest for students in grades K–12, encouraging them to apply AI to projects or community challenges. She said the initiative is aimed at showcasing both the opportunities and limitations of the technology.

“America must lead in this field,” Trump told the gathering. “And leadership starts in our classrooms.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending