Connect with us

Business

US government to invest in MP Materials’ rare earths production

Published

on


Jonathan Josephs

Business reporter, BBC News

Bloomberg/Getty Employees load a truck with bags of rare earth concentrates at the Mountain Pass mine, operated by MP Materials, in Mountain Pass, California, U.S., on Friday, June 7, 2019. Bloomberg/Getty

The US government is to become the biggest shareholder in the country’s only operational rare earths mine.

It is also going to take a series of other steps to underpin the future of the operation in Mountain Pass, California.

Rare earths are essential to huge amounts of modern technology, such as electric cars and wind turbines.

Access to these metals has been at the heart of a US-China trade war, with Beijing controlling about 90% of global mining capacity.

MP Materials, which owns the mine, has entered into an agreement with the US Department of Defense that is designed to reduce America’s dependency on imports of rare earths.

The deal means that for the next 10 years the US government will commit to MP Materials receiving a minimum price of $110 per kg for its neodymium and praseodymium output.

These are two of the most in-demand of the 17 different rare earths for the global economy. They are crucial for making permanent magnets, which are found in everything from smartphones to MRI scanners and electric motors.

The move follows concerns that China has used its near total control of the industry to push prices down and force companies in other countries out of business.

Getty Images A hand holding light brown soil containing rare earths with some of the soil being allowed to fall though the fingersGetty Images

China is home to about 70% of the world’s rare earth mining and 90% of refining capacity as a result of years of government support for the industry.

Under the agreement, MP Materials will build a new US facility to increase how much of the raw materials from the mine it can turn into useable products.

The location is still to be decided, but the company says it will serve both defence and commercial customers.

Much of this will be funded by the Department of Defense buying $400m of newly created shares.

“This initiative marks a decisive action by the Trump administration to accelerate American supply chain independence,” said MP Materials founder and chief executive James Litinsky.

Until now Shenghe Resources, a company partly owned by the Chinese government, has been one of MP Materials’ largest shareholders.

Shenghe had been the sole customer for the output of the Californian mine, which meant that its rare earths were being sent to China for refining.

Earlier this year, MP Materials said that it would stop doing this because of the huge 125% tariffs that China imposed on US goods, in response to the 145% tariffs President Trump had imposed on Chinese imports.

It added that tariffs meant sending its output to China was neither commercially viable nor in alignment with America’s national interests.

Rare earths have been at the heart of efforts to repair a US-China trade relationship that has deteriorated since Trump returned to the White House.

Increased tariffs led Beijing to impose a new export licensing regime that severely limited how much of these materials was reaching American manufacturers.

An agreement to improve that access, in exchange for lifting some of the US’s own export restrictions in other areas, was at the heart of recent trade talks between the world’s two biggest economies in London and Geneva.

Despite that commitment the US complained that it has not been implemented fast enough.

In the longer term, domestic supplies are the US’s best bet on increasing access to the rare earths which are crucial to the manufacturing that is at the heart of Trump’s economic vision for the country.

China’s export controls have also led to criticism in Europe, with the European Parliament voting in favour of a resolution that called Beijing’s controls “unjustified” and “intended to be coercive”.

They also urged the European Commission to speed up the implementation of the Critical Raw Materials Act, which came into force last year and is designed to reduce Europe’s reliance on imports.

On a visit to Germany last week, China’s foreign minister downplayed these concerns, saying it was his country’s “sovereign right” as well as being “common practice” to control exports of goods that have both commercial as well as military uses.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

South Korea to probe potential human rights abuses in US raid

Published

on


The South Korean government says it is investigating potential human rights violations during the raid and detention of Korean workers by US authorities.

South Korea has expressed “strong regret” to the US and has officially asked that its citizens’ rights and interests are not infringed during law enforcement proceedings, said a presidential spokesperson on Monday.

More than 300 South Korean workers returned home on Friday after being held for a week following a raid at an electric vehicle battery plant in the US state of Georgia.

The incident has tested ties between the countries, even as South Korean firms are set to invest billions in America under a trade deal to avoid steep US tariffs.

South Korean authorities will work with the relevant companies to “thoroughly investigate any potential human rights violations or other issues”, said the presidential spokesperson during a press briefing.

The raid has raised tensions between the US and South Korea, where many of those detained were from, with President Lee Jae-myung warning that it will discourage foreign investment into the US.

He called the situation “bewildering”, adding that it is a common practice for Korean companies to send workers to help set up overseas factories.

Last week, Hyundai said the plant’s opening will be delayed by at least two months.

South Korea’s trade unions have called on Trump to issue an official apology.

On 4 September, around 475 people – mostly South Korean nationals – were arrested at a Hyundai-operated plant, in what marked the largest single-location immigration raid since US President Donald Trump launched a crackdown on illegal migrants earlier this year.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials said the South Koreans had overstayed their visas or were not permitted to work in the US.

A South Korean worker who witnessed the raid told the BBC of panic and confusion as federal agents descended on the site, with some people being led away in chains.

Trump has said foreign workers sent to the country are “welcome” and he doesn’t want to “frighten off” investors.

The US needs to learn from foreign experts of fields like shipbuilding, chipmaking and computing, Trump said on his Truth Social platform on Sunday.

“We welcome them, we welcome their employees, and we are willing to proudly say we will learn from them, and do even better than them at their own ‘game,’ sometime in the not too distant future,” he said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Email eats up 28% of your week. Here’s how to get your time back

Published

on



You sit down to tackle a big project, and within minutes, your inbox pings. A Slack message follows. By the time you’ve responded to those, another four have hit your inbox. Before you know it, your morning’s derailed, and your deep work window is gone. 

Email alone consumes over a quarter of the average professional’s workweek. But it’s not just the volume that hurts. It’s how email fragments your attention, blocks deep work, and subtly sabotages your success. The average knowledge worker gets hit with 117 emails and 153 chat messages a day. And they check email on average 15 times daily, often reacting instead of prioritizing.

At Lifehack Method, we coach busy professionals on how to reclaim their time and do meaningful, fulfilling work. I’ve interviewed hundreds of managers and executives about how they manage email. Some are still drowning. But others have found simple, powerful systems that have changed the game (and no, it’s not necessary to aspire to Inbox Zero). 

With just a few key shifts, you can, too. Here are five proven strategies to stop letting email run your day.

1. Force yourself to close your email inbox

Most professionals work with their email inbox open, just in case an urgent request comes through. But that hypervigilance crushes your focus and can cause you to be less effective as a manager.

The fix is batching. Check all your communication channels—email, Slack, Teams—in short, focused windows. Outside those windows, you close your inbox and turn off notifications. If the idea makes you nervous, start small. Try five mini batch sessions spaced throughout the day. Eventually, you’ll find that three 30-minute sessions are plenty, even for high-volume inboxes.

What do you do during these batching sessions? Enter strategy #2: 

2. Replace your folders with the Stack Method

The Stack Method is a popular email folder system that professionals use to categorize each email that comes into their inbox. Instead of creating dozens of folders based on your unique workflow, every email goes to one of five folders based on the action it needs.

These are the five folders: 

  • Reply: Needs a thoughtful response, but will take you more than two minutes
  • Do: Small tasks to complete (under 15 minutes)
  • Meetings: Scheduling or prep-related items
  • Waiting On: You’ve responded, but need follow-up
  • Review: FYIs, CCs, or anything to skim later

During your email batch sessions, your job is to clear your main inbox by sorting everything into these folders. Once sorted, take action on each folder during dedicated time blocks. This is how overwhelmed professionals regain control over their email inbox quickly, without worrying that something is falling through the cracks.

3. Use AI to prioritize, conserve mental energy, and go faster

Ever left responding to an email for “later” only to spend more time remembering, flagging, or reopening it? It’s often because we don’t have the mental bandwidth to carefully type out a reply right then and there. 

But with voice dictation, which is three times faster than typing, layered with AI, you’ll find that email responses that used to take 5–10 minutes can now be done in under two. You can even use an AI writer (such as Chat GPT Writer, which plugs directly into Gmail) to draft a first pass, which you then review and edit. 

Here’s a voice-dictation prompt to use on the go: “Draft an email response from me [Your Name]. Tell them: [ramble your message here]. Keep it [short, informal, professional, etc.].” The AI turns your verbal mess into a polished email draft that’s 80% ready to go.

Executives are also using AI Agent tools like Fyxer.ai for AI-generated replies and inbox prioritization. Kara Brown is the CEO of LeadCoverage, the largest go-to-market agency that focuses on supply chain. She shares, “I’m sort of obsessed with [Fyxer], mostly because of the prioritization. It tells me when I get a one-to-one email versus when I’m on a list serve . . . which is very handy in my very full inbox. It [also] drafts a response for me based on all the other emails that I’ve written. Frankly, Fyxer is much nicer than I am! While I might write a three-word reply, like “OK, thank you,” it will write four or five sentences and make me sound so much nicer and polite. It’s making it a lot easier to be more personal in my insanely overwhelming inbox.” 

Jeff Smith, PhD, is the founder of QuantumIOT and a serial technology entrepreneur. He is quick to note that the best AI agent features currently offered by third parties will likely become native to your email platform of choice very soon. So, if you’re not an early adopter of new tech, you have nothing to worry about. “The real win really isn’t inbox zero, it’s more like finally having the kind of assistant that we’ve only really ever seen on TV,” he says. 

This isn’t about outsourcing your voice. It’s about expressing what you already know, but faster, cleaner, and more professionally.

4. Buy time with placeholder replies

When someone emails you, they’re not usually expecting an immediate answer. What they really want is certainty that you saw it, and a clear timeline for your reply. Send a placeholder reply like this: “Thanks—this is on my radar. I’ll get back to you by tomorrow afternoon. Let me know if it’s more urgent.” That one line calms the sender and gives you breathing room to craft a well-thought out response later.

Another variation: If someone’s message is vague, don’t try to decode it yourself. Reply with a quick clarifying question: “Quick q—are you looking for input on X, or a final decision on Y?” This avoids the dread that you might erroneously interpret what they need from you, and end up needing to re-do the work anyway.

5. Replace long collaborative threads entirely

When collaboration happens inside email threads, workers feel pressured to constantly check their inbox, just in case someone’s waiting on them. Even the best batching system can break down when your colleagues are unknowingly using your inbox as a live chat tool. 

Cal Newport, computer science professor and author of A World Without Email, calls this constant back-and-forth the “hyperactive hive mind”—a work style where problems are solved through an endless string of ad hoc, unscheduled messages. He calls this workflow a “misery-making machine.” With AI, this problem will accelerate. If you’re sending more emails, faster, you’d better believe that everyone else will, too. The hive mind will become even more hyperactive.

The fix is to move collaborative work to shared hubs like Google Docs (for coauthoring and commenting) and Asana or ClickUp (for task-based back-and-forth).

This shift creates two clear benefits. First, it protects your inbox for what it’s meant for—announcements, logistics, and brief 1:1 communications. Second, it protects your time by shifting multi-person conversations into tools designed for asynchronous collaboration (such as Asana, which is what we use at Lifehack Method).

If you’re leading a team, make this an explicit policy. If you’re an individual contributor, start by modeling the behavior—commenting in docs, tagging teammates in project tools, and replying to email threads with “Let’s move this over to Asana.” The more collaborative conversations you remove from email, the easier it becomes to manage your inbox and maintain your focus.

Email doesn’t have to be your biggest productivity leak

These strategies aren’t about zeroing out your inbox for bragging rights. They’re about protecting your focus and getting your time back. With a few small shifts, you can take back hours of time and massive amounts of cognitive energy from processing email, and reinvest it in the work that really drives you forward. That’s the kind of ROI your week needs.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

OpenAI Execs on the 3 Things Companies Need to Get Right When Using AI

Published

on


The executives leading the product and engineering efforts for OpenAI’s developer platform say companies must adopt a result-oriented approach to successfully roll out AI to employees.

Olivier Godement and Sherwin Wu head product and engineering for OpenAI’s developer platform, respectively. During an interview on the BG2 podcast that aired Thursday, Godement and Wu shared three tips on how companies can integrate AI.

“Number one is the interesting combination of top-down buy-in and enabling a very clear group, like a tiger team,” Godement said. He added that the team could be a mix of staff from AI providers like OpenAI, as well as the company’s own employees.

Godement said members of the “tiger team” should possess either technical skills or a deep understanding of the company’s processes.

“In the enterprise, like customer support, what we found is that the vast majority of the knowledge is in people’s heads,” Godement said.

“Unless you have that tiger team, a mix of technical and subject matter experts, it’s really hard to get something out of the ground,” he added.

Next, Godement and Wu said companies need to develop clear benchmarks, or what they call “evals,” to track their progress with AI.

“Evals are much harder than what it looks to get done,” Godement said.

“Evals, oftentimes, need to come bottom-up, because all of these things are kind of in people’s heads, in the actual operator’s heads. It’s actually very hard to have a top-down mandate,” Wu said.

Lastly, Godement said that companies should monitor their benchmarks closely and strive to make progress against them.

“A lot of that is like art sometimes, more than science,” he said.

Progress can be achieved by having a good understanding of an AI model’s design, behavior, and constraints, Godement said.

“Sometimes, we even need to fine-tune ourselves the models, when there are some clear limitations, and you know, being patient, getting you way up there and then, ship,” he added.

Godement said it was important for a company’s top leadership to make AI a priority and give their staff the opportunity to experiment.

“Letting the team organize and be like, ‘OK, if you want to start small, start small, and then you can scale it up.’ That would be number 1,” he added.

OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.

Tech CEOs have been stepping up their efforts when it comes to getting their employees to use AI.

Duolingo CEO Luis von Ahn said in an August interview with The New York Times that Duolingo has been organizing weekly activities to encourage teams to use AI.

“Every Friday morning, we have this thing: It’s a bad acronym, f-r-A-I-days,” von Ahn told the Times.

Howie Liu, the CEO of the vibe coding platform Airtable, said in an episode of Lenny’s Podcats that aired last month that he wants his staff to experiment with AI, even if it entails taking time off work.

“If you want to cancel all your meetings for a day or for an entire week and just go play around with every AI product that you think could be relevant to Airtable, go do it. Period,” Liu said.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending