(TNS) — When Lacoochee Elementary School resumes classes in August, principal Latoya Jordan wants teachers to focus more attention on each student’s individual academic needs.

She’s looking at artificial intelligence as a tool they can use to personalize lessons.

“I’m interested to see how it can help,” Jordan said.

Lacoochee is exploring whether to become part of the Pasco County school district’s new AI initiative being offered to 30 campuses in the fall. It’s a test run that two groups — Scholar Educationand Khanmigo — have offered the district free of charge to see whether the schools find a longer-term fit for their classes.

Scholar, a state-funded startup that made its debut last year at Pepin Academy and Dayspring Academy, will go into selected elementary schools. Khanmigo, a national model recently highlighted on 60 Minutes, is set for use in some middle and high schools.

“Schools ultimately will decide how they want to use it,” said Monica Ilse, deputy superintendent for academics. “I want to get feedback from teachers and leaders for the future.”

Ilse said she expected the programs might free teachers from some of the more mundane aspects of their jobs, so they can pay closer attention to their students. A recent Gallup poll found teachers who regularly use AI said it saves them about six hours of work weekly, in areas such as writing quizzes and completing paperwork.

Marlee Strawn, cofounder of Scholar Education, introduced her system to the principals of 19 schools during a June 30 video call. The model is tied to Florida’s academic standards, Strawn said, and includes dozens of lessons that teachers can use.

It also allows teachers to craft their own assignments, tapping into the growing body of material being uploaded. The more specific the request, the more fine-tuned the exercises can be. If a student has a strong interest in baseball or ballet, for instance, the AI programming can help develop standards-based tasks on those subjects, she explained.

Perhaps most useful, Strawn told the principals, is the system’s ability to support teachers as they analyze student performance data. It identifies such things as the types of questions students asked and the items they struggled with, and can make suggestions about how to respond.

“The data analytics has been the most helpful for our teachers so far,” she said.

She stressed that Scholar Education protects student data privacy, a common concern among parents and educators, noting the system got a top rating from Common Sense.

School board member Jessica Wright brought up criticisms that AI has proven notoriously error-prone in math.

Strawn said the system has proven helpful when teachers seek to provide real-life examples for math concepts. She did not delve into details about the reliability of AI in calculations and formulas.

Lacoochee principal Jordan wanted to know how well the AI system would interface with other technologies, such as iReady, that schools already use.

“If it works with some of our current systems, that’s an easier way to ease into it, so for teachers it doesn’t become one more thing that you have to do,” Jordan said.

Strawn said the automated bot is a supplement that teachers can integrate with data from other tools to help them identify classroom needs and create the types of differentiated instruction that Jordan and others are looking for.

The middle and high school model, Khanmigo, will focus more on student tutoring, Ilse wrote in an email to principals. It’s designed to “guide students to a deeper understanding of the content and skills mastery,” she explained in the email. As with Scholar, teachers can monitor students’ interactions and step in with one-on-one support as needed, in addition to developing lesson plans and standards-aligned quizzes.

Superintendent John Legg said teachers and schools would not be required to use AI. Legg said he simply wanted to provide options that might help teachers in their jobs. After a year, the district will evaluate whether to continue, most likely with paid services.

While an administrator at Dayspring Academy before his election, Legg wrote a letter of support for Scholar Education’s bid for a $1 million state startup grant, and he also received campaign contributions from some of the group’s leaders. He said he had no personal stake in the organization and was backing a project that might improve education, just as he previously supported Algebra Nation, the University of Florida’s online math tutoring program launched in 2013.

©2025 Tampa Bay Times. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Nearly a week after Kolkata-headquartered Crizac raised Rs. 860 crore (£73.9 million) through its initial public offering (IPO), structured as an offer for sale (OFS) by promoters Pinky Agarwal and Manish Agarwal, the company’s shares surged in domestic stock markets on Wednesday, at nearly a 15% premium above the issue price of Rs. 245. 

The IPO’s success – managed by Equirus Capital Private Limited and Anand Rathi Advisors Limited – along with its strong performance on the National Stock Exchange and Bombay Stock Exchange, is expected to fuel Crizac’s expansion into new destinations and services.

“The reason we went for a full OFS, or fully secondary, as we might say in the UK, is because the company’s balance sheet is very strong. We already have sufficient capital to support our expansion plans. Our focus remains on diversifying globally, which has been our strength over the past five years and will continue to be our strength in the future,” Christopher Nagle, CEO of Crizac, told The PIE News. 

While an OFS means that the company, in this case, Crizac, did not raise new capital through the IPO – with proceeds instead going to existing shareholders, namely the Agarwals – its entry into the financial markets allows the company to publicly demonstrate “the scale, size, and operations of the company in a transparent way”, according to Nagle.

Crizac’s decision to go public comes as it looks to expand, beyond student recruitment, into areas such as student loans, housing, and other services. 

The company is also eyeing new geographies and high-growth markets within India.

We also see great potential and can add great value in other destinations like Ireland, the USA, and Australia
_{^{Vikash Agarwal, Crizac}}

“We have a strong plan to expand across cities in India. Even though we are already one of the biggest recruiters for India-UK, we believe there’s still significant room for growth,” stated Vikash Agarwal, chairman and managing director, Crizac. 

“We also see great potential and can add great value in other destinations like Ireland, the USA, and Australia,” he added. 

Crizac, which reported a total income of Rs. 849.5 crore (£78m) in FY25, currently works with over 10,000 agents and some 173 international institutions.

Tthrough its stock market listing, the company aims to strengthen confidence among it partners.

“The fact that we are listed doesn’t change how we interact with agents, but we believe it will lead to even greater trust from universities and agent partners alike, thanks to the level of diligence and corporate governance that is now required of us,” stated Nagle.

With a market capitalisation of Rs 5,379.84 crore (nearly £555m), Crizac’s solid financial track record and low debt levels have been key drivers behind its IPO, even as changing policies in major study destinations continue to influence the sector.

As destinations like Australia hike visa fees, the UK increases compliance among institutions and considers imposing levies on international student fees, the US tightens vetting and eyes visa time limits, and Canada raises financial thresholds amid falling study permits, it remains to be seen how students from India, Nigeria, and China will navigate their study abroad choices in the coming years. 

According to government data presented in the Indian Parliament, there was a nearly 15% decline in Indian students going abroad, largely in the major four destinations, while countries like Germany, Russia, France, Ireland, and New Zealand saw increased interest.

However, despite the downturn, Crizac is confident that its move will inspire other Indian education companies to create value on the global stage. 

“Being the first listed company in this space will unlock significant value for the industry. We believe many are already watching our listing closely, and there will be a lot others going public from this sector now,” stated Agarwal. 

The integration of artificial intelligence into our daily lives is no longer a futuristic concept but a present-day reality, fundamentally reshaping industries and institutions. From the bustling floors of global corporations to the hallowed halls of academia, AI is proving to be a transformative, yet complex, force. For business and tech leaders, understanding the dual nature of this technological revolution—its remarkable advantages and its inherent challenges—is paramount. There are both pros and cons on AI in the workplace and in education: this article delves into the multifaceted impact of AI in the workplace and education, exploring the significant opportunities it presents alongside the critical concerns that demand our attention.

AI in the Workplace: A New Era of Productivity and Peril

The modern workplace is in the throes of an AI-driven evolution, promising unprecedented levels of efficiency and innovation. One of the most significant pros of artificial intelligence in a professional setting is its ability to automate repetitive and mundane tasks. This allows human employees to redirect their focus towards more strategic, creative, and complex problem-solving endeavors. For instance, in the realm of human resources, AI-powered tools can screen thousands of resumes in minutes, a task that would take a team of recruiters days to complete. Companies like Oracle are leveraging their AI-powered human resource solutions to streamline candidate sourcing and improve hiring decisions, freeing up HR professionals to concentrate on building relationships and fostering a positive work environment.

Beyond automation, AI is a powerful engine for enhanced decision-making. By analyzing vast datasets, machine learning algorithms can identify patterns and trends that are imperceptible to the human eye, providing data-driven insights that inform strategic business choices. In the financial sector, AI algorithms are instrumental in fraud detection, analyzing transaction patterns in real-time to flag anomalies and prevent fraudulent activities before they cause significant damage. Similarly, in manufacturing, companies like Siemens are utilizing AI-powered “Industrial Copilots” to monitor machinery, predict maintenance needs, and prevent costly downtime, thereby optimizing production lines and ensuring operational continuity.

However, the widespread adoption of AI in the workplace is not without its cons. The most pressing concern for many is the specter of job displacement. As AI systems become more sophisticated, there is a legitimate fear that roles currently performed by humans, particularly those involving routine and predictable tasks, will become obsolete. While some argue that AI will create new jobs, there is a transitional period that could see significant disruption and require a massive effort in upskilling and reskilling the workforce.

Furthermore, the ethical implications of AI cannot be overstated. The potential for bias in AI algorithms is a significant challenge. If an AI system is trained on biased data, it will perpetuate and even amplify those biases in its decision-making processes. Additionally, the increasing use of AI raises serious privacy concerns — some people have go on to create distasteful clothes remover AI tools. The vast amounts of data that AI systems collect and process, from employee performance metrics to customer behavior, create a treasure trove of sensitive information that must be protected from misuse and security breaches.

AI in Education: Personalizing Learning While Preserving the Human Touch

The educational landscape is also being profoundly reshaped by artificial intelligence, with the promise of creating more personalized, engaging, and accessible learning experiences. One of the most celebrated benefits of AI in education is its capacity to facilitate personalized learning at scale. AI-powered adaptive learning platforms can tailor educational content to the individual needs and learning pace of each student. For example, platforms like Carnegie Learning’s “Mika” software use AI to provide personalized tutoring in mathematics, offering real-time feedback and adapting the curriculum to address a student’s specific areas of difficulty. This individualized approach has the potential to revolutionize how we teach and learn, moving away from a one-size-fits-all model to a more student-centric methodology.

AI is also a valuable tool for automating the administrative burdens that often consume a significant portion of educators’ time. Grading multiple-choice tests, managing schedules, and tracking attendance are all tasks that can be efficiently handled by AI systems. This frees up teachers to focus on what they do best: inspiring, mentoring, and interacting directly with their students. Language-learning apps like Duolingo are a prime example of AI in action, using machine learning to personalize lessons and provide instant feedback, making language education more accessible and engaging for millions of users worldwide.

Despite these advancements, the integration of AI in education raises a number of critical concerns and cons. A primary worry is the potential for a diminished human connection in the learning process. While AI can provide personalized content, it cannot replicate the empathy, encouragement, and nuanced understanding that a human teacher provides. Over-reliance on technology could lead to a sense of isolation for students and hinder the development of crucial social and emotional skills.

Data privacy is another significant hurdle. Educational AI platforms collect vast amounts of student data, from academic performance to learning behaviors. Ensuring the security and ethical use of this sensitive information is paramount. There is a tangible risk of this data being misused or falling victim to cyberattacks, which could have serious consequences for students and educational institutions.

In conclusion, artificial intelligence has both pros and cons, both the workplace and the field of education. The potential for increased productivity, data-driven insights, and personalized experiences is immense. However, we must proceed with a clear-eyed understanding of the challenges. Addressing concerns around job displacement, data privacy, and the importance of human interaction will be crucial in harnessing the full potential of AI for the betterment of our professional and educational futures. The path forward lies not in a blind embrace of technology, but in a thoughtful and ethical integration that prioritizes both progress and humanity.