Tools & Platforms
We Have Proof AI Is Improving CX
Most of us want to see real benefits from AI, and for businesses, the contact center has long been one of the best use cases. The challenges are very real, and there is lots of incentive to find better solutions. With customer service now being framed as CX, the problem set becomes strategic for the business, so it’s bigger than just the contact center.
As such, the stakes are higher now, and technology investments are no longer about making incremental improvements. CX leaders – and business leaders – need to be ready to re-think everything they do in the name of serving customers. The more rooted the contact center is in legacy technology, the more transformational the change needs to be. With the right approach, the outcomes can meet this brief, especially in terms of elevating CX, and making customers feel more valued than ever before.
With all the hype, contact centers are being led to believe that AI is the right – and perhaps only – approach for them to follow. But, how can technology decision-makers know for sure? There are real results in the market, and to illustrate, I have some takeaways from a recent vendor event.
NiCE Interactions 2025 – Making it Real
All CX vendors aspire to deliver that right approach, but with AI evolving so fast, it’s difficult to tell who is getting real results. Any vendor can show tangible, AI-driven outcomes around standard KPIs such as time to answer or handle times, but these metrics are largely about automation.
While valuable, it’s not transformational, and what CX leaders should really be looking for are business-level outcomes that reflect a more strategic approach to AI. Automation is part of that, but AI needs to also address business drivers such as customer retention, marketing efficacy, agent empowerment, operational efficiency, compliance, data security, etc.
When thinking along those lines, the bar becomes higher for enterprises when partnering with CX vendors. They need a richer sense of what’s real, not just for the incremental benefits, but also the bigger picture where AI helps CX align with their business strategy.
That may be asking a lot, but I saw solid evidence of that at the recent NiCE Interactions 2025 event in Las Vegas. Aside from showcasing major strides with AI and their CXone platform from last year’s Interactions event, this was the first time most of us saw new-ish CEO Scott Russell. The company also just did a branding refresh to reflect their “NiCE world” product promise, which behind the scenes is largely powered by AI.
While agentic AI is all the rage right now, it’s just one of many touch points along the CX spectrum for AI. Before moving on to customer successes, it’s worth noting how extensively AI is embedded throughout NiCE’s CXone platform, as this is a big part of making that product promise real.
A few examples of these AI CX touchpoints include Topic AI, where unstructured transcripts are turned into structured data to enrich their LLMs; using Copilot to augment agent performance; Agent Builder to automate workflows; and Mpower Desk to make all tasks visible on one screen in real time, integrating front and back-office operations on a single platform.
Real Results from Real Customers
Impressive as all this is, the best proof points came directly from the customers themselves. Over the two days of sessions, we heard from six Tier-1 customers, each of whom explained how AI aligned with the company’s broader business priorities and initiatives while also driving better CX outcomes.
Tangible CX outcomes were cited, but just as important, we heard how these AI capabilities are helping them understand and meet the expectations of today’s customers – something all of them were struggling to do before. Here are two select examples, and note how they are from very different types of businesses; NiCE’s capabilities are not specific to a particular vertical, meaning that all CX leaders should be thinking along these lines for AI.
Arun Chandra, Disney
The first customer success story was from Arun Chandra, SVP of CX at Disney. I would argue that Disney sets the bar for how successfully brands tell stories, and the company’s narrative here was about customer journey being a form of storytelling. Chandra talked about the importance of upholding the brand in everything they do, and being the best at everything they do. As such, when it came to using AI for CX, Disney needed a partner with the best technology, the best AI safeguards, and the ability to do both at scale.
Knowing their AI deployment with NiCE would be safe, Disney has been able to deploy a mix of human and virtual agents for seamless CX to deliver a more modern form of customer service.
In terms of supporting the Disney brand, this new approach for using AI with CX also aligns well with Disney being a leading adopter of cinematic technology for movie making. While no AI metrics were shared here, the impact on a strategic level is real, and is a great example for how some customers are looking for more than tangible outcomes when choosing a CX partner for AI.
Brendan Mulryan, H&R Block
As VP of CX, Mulryan explained tax returns could benefit from modernizing their approach to customer service. With a nationwide network of retail locations to support millions of customers, a consumer-facing financial services company is an ideal use case for AI. Not only must call routing be intelligent enough to route inquiries to the nearest location, but the customer support must scale up for traffic peaks during tax season that are unlike most any other type of business.
Most of H&R Block’s inquiries are telephony-centric, simple tasks like setting appointments to come in to meet with a tax preparer. While not looking to reinvent the customer journey, H&R Block’s core need was to uplevel their IVA, especially during tax season. With NiCE Autopilot, the company was able to automate these inquiries, along with providing an SMS offramp in cases where customers preferred to use messaging instead of voice.
Not only does this improvement make the process of tax filing more efficient for everyone, but a better CX also strengthens customer loyalty. In terms of operational efficiency, Mulryan reported a 63% containment rate with NiCE. I don’t think he shared what that level was previously, but it clearly was an improvement, where almost two thirds of all calls could be fully automated.
That alone might be enough to justify deploying AI, but as with Disney – and other customer success stories – the strategic drivers were major considerations in choosing a technology partner. For H&R Block, this would be partnering with a vendor that could support their Next 2030 plan, and how improving CX is more than just serving the customer well for this year’s return.
The bigger goal is to “empower financial freedom for the client through trust and technology”, where the focus is on the lifetime value of each customer. Technology is key to building trust in any business, but especially here, when dealing with highly-sensitive personal financial data. Brendan cited a data point to support a high level of trust, showing that 78% intend to return after deploying with NiCE. That’s another good metric to show the real impact of AI on CX.
On a more strategic level, he talked about the need for AI to derive new insights from customer interactions to allow both agents and tax preparers to provide more personalized forms of service. This drives new value, not just for identifying new areas to provide additional services during tax time, but throughout the entire year. As such, similar to Disney, H&R Block had specific objectives, as well as transformational aspirations for CX, making this more than just an exercise in modernizing self-service.
The Takeaway for Enterprise Technology Leaders
Across these customer success stories – along with others during the breakout sessions – NiCE is clearly delivering real results with AI. As with any showcase event for customers, prospects and partners, there was also AI hype. Yes, the hype is real, but so are the results, and for the time being, the two go hand-in-hand with vendor messaging.
At Interactions, attendees did get a taste of some real benchmarks with AI, so it would be a mistake for CX leaders to hold off on AI until there’s more proof, and/or for the hype to die down. To that, I would cite Bryan Mulryan’s parting message about how the “cost of inaction” is high, especially with AI changing so quickly.
Along with that, he noted the need to rethink notions of ROI with these new technologies. The “right approach” for CX leaders is about achieving transformational outcomes with AI, and not just looking for operational efficiencies. Performance metrics do validate AI as being real, but so do the transformational outcomes that go beyond the numbers. That was a common theme across all the customer success stories, and when considering partners for AI and CX, the reality check needs to be a mix of both.
Tools & Platforms
Apple’s Top AI Engineer Leaves for Meta with Jaw-Dropping Pay
Apple’s Top AI Engineer Leaves for Meta
Key Highlights:
- Apple’s top AI leader,
Ruoming Pang , is leaving for Meta with a multi-million dollar salary offer. - Pang led a large team working on AI models powering
Siri and other Apple features. - Several other
Apple AI engineers are expected to follow him to Meta or other companies. - Meta is investing heavily in AI and aggressively hiring top talent to compete with rivals.
Apple has lost one of its top artificial intelligence (AI) executives, Ruoming Pang, who led the company’s important AI models team. He is now joining Meta, the company behind Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.
Ruoming Pang was a key engineer managing Apple’s foundation models, which help power many AI features in Apple devices, such as Siri and Apple Intelligence. He joined Apple in 2021 from Google’s parent company, Alphabet. Now, Meta has offered him a very attractive salary package worth tens of millions of dollars per year, which led to his decision to leave Apple.
This move highlights the fierce competition among big tech companies like Apple, Meta, Google, and OpenAI to hire the best AI talent. Meta has been aggressively recruiting AI experts recently, including people from OpenAI and other startups, to build advanced AI systems they call “superintelligence.”
At Apple, Ruoming Pang was in charge of a team of about 100 people working on large language models — the technology behind many AI-powered apps. Recently, Apple announced it would open these models for third-party app developers to create new AI-based iPhone and iPad apps.
However, Apple’s AI team has been facing challenges and internal changes. Some engineers are reportedly planning to leave, and the company is considering using AI technology from outside companies like OpenAI or Anthropic to improve Siri, its voice assistant.
Apple’s AI efforts have also seen leadership changes, with some teams moving away from Ruoming Pang’s group. Now, Zhifeng Chen will lead the foundation models team, with a new structure of managers to help run the work.
Apple is still investing heavily in AI, with top executives like Craig Federighi and Mike Rockwell focusing on new AI features. But losing a top leader like Pang shows how competitive and difficult it is for Apple to keep pace in the fast-moving AI field.
Meta, led by CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is spending billions on AI and making it a top priority. Zuckerberg has personally been involved in recruiting top AI engineers to build the future of AI at Meta.
In summary, Apple’s loss of Ruoming Pang to Meta is a major sign of the ongoing “war for AI talent” among tech giants. It remains to be seen how Apple will respond and strengthen its AI efforts going forward.
Tools & Platforms
Analysis: Renewables missing out on AI investment boom despite fuelling the technology – Business Green
Tools & Platforms
Major Threat or Just the Next Tech Thing?
Story Highlights
- U.S. adults divided over whether AI poses a novel technology threat
- Majority do foresee AI taking important tasks away from humans
- Most say they will avoid embracing AI as long as possible
WASHINGTON, D.C. — As artificial intelligence transitions from abstraction to reality, U.S. adults are evenly divided on its implications for humankind. Forty-nine percent say AI is “just the latest in a long line of technological advancements that humans will learn to use to improve their lives and society,” while an equal proportion say it is “very different from the technological advancements that came before, and threatens to harm humans and society.”
Despite this split assessment, a clear majority (59%) say AI will reduce the need for humans to perform important or creative tasks, while just 38% believe it will mostly handle mundane tasks, freeing humans to do higher-impact work.
And perhaps reflecting AI’s potential to diminish human contributions, 64% plan to resist using it in their own lives for as long as possible rather than quickly embracing it (35%).
###Embeddable###
Majorities Expect AI to Eclipse the Telephone, Internet in Changing Society
Americans may not be convinced that AI poses a threat to humanity, but majorities foresee it having a bigger impact on society than did several major technological advancements of the past century.
Two-thirds (66%) say AI will surpass robotics in societal influence, and more than half say it will exceed the impact of the internet (56%), the computer (57%) and the smartphone (59%). Just over half (52%) think AI will have more impact than the telephone did when it was introduced.
###Embeddable###
Familiarity Breeds Comfort?
Americans’ perceptions of the impact AI will have on society don’t differ much by gender, age or other characteristics. Most demographic groups are closely split over whether AI is just the next technological thing versus a novel threat. But attitudes vary significantly by people’s exposure to AI.
Seventy-one percent of daily users of generative AI (programs like ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot that can create new content, such as text, images and music) say AI is just another technological advancement. By contrast, only 35% of those who never use generative AI agree.
This 36-percentage-point gap contrasts with smaller differences between users and nonusers of other AI applications in confidence that AI can be harnessed for good. There is a 27-point difference between users and nonusers of virtual assistants (like Amazon Alexa and Apple Siri) in their view that AI will benefit humans. And there are roughly 20-point differences in this endorsement of AI between users and nonusers of personalized content (such as apps that make movie and product recommendations) and smart devices (like robotic vacuums and fitness trackers).
###Embeddable###
Personalized Content Now Routine; Generative AI Still Novel
ChatGPT reportedly became the fastest-growing app ever, after it was launched publicly in November 2022. However, adoption of generative AI, generally, among U.S. adults is still sparse relative to other types of AI. Less than a third of U.S. adults currently report using generative AI tools either daily or weekly. About a quarter use them less frequently than that, while 41% don’t use them at all.
At the same time, more than four in 10 adults say they use voice recognition/virtual assistants (45%) or smart devices (41%) at least weekly. And nearly two-thirds (65%) report frequent use of personalized content.
###Embeddable###
Demographic Gaps Greatest for Generative AI Adoption
The broad adoption of personalized content is reflected in the relative uniformity of its use across demographic groups. The same is true for virtual assistants and smart devices, except that — possibly reflecting their expense — the use of smart devices is greater among upper- than middle- and lower-income groups and, relatedly, among college-educated and employed adults. Smart devices are also the one technology used more often by women (44%) than men (37%).
On the other hand, there are sizable differences by age, education, employment and gender in the use of generative AI.
- The rate of using generative AI daily or weekly is highest among 18- to 29-year-olds (43%) and lowest among seniors (19%).
- There is an eight-point difference by gender, with more men (36%) than women (28%) using it. However, the gender gap is greater among adults 50 and older than among those 18 to 49.
- Employed adults (37%) are nearly twice as likely as nonworking adults (20%) to be regularly using generative AI.
###Embeddable###
Bottom Line
While Americans are split over whether AI is a routine step in the evolution of technology or a unique threat, most expect it to diminish the need for human creativity and are hesitant to fully adopt it personally. For now, positive views of AI are closely linked with people’s experience with it, rather than their personal demographics. The implication is that as usage expands, acceptance may follow.
Stay up to date with the latest insights by following @Gallup on X and on Instagram.
Learn more about how the Gallup Panel works.
###Embeddable###
-
Funding & Business1 week ago
Kayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries
-
Jobs & Careers1 week ago
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Mergers & Acquisitions1 week ago
Donald Trump suggests US government review subsidies to Elon Musk’s companies
-
Funding & Business1 week ago
Rethinking Venture Capital’s Talent Pipeline
-
Jobs & Careers1 week ago
Why Agentic AI Isn’t Pure Hype (And What Skeptics Aren’t Seeing Yet)
-
Education2 days ago
9 AI Ethics Scenarios (and What School Librarians Would Do)
-
Education3 days ago
Teachers see online learning as critical for workforce readiness in 2025
-
Education3 days ago
Nursery teachers to get £4,500 to work in disadvantaged areas
-
Education5 days ago
How ChatGPT is breaking higher education, explained
-
Jobs & Careers1 week ago
Astrophel Aerospace Raises ₹6.84 Crore to Build Reusable Launch Vehicle