Connect with us

Tools & Platforms

Ai In Space Exploration Market Outlook 2025-2034 |

Published

9 hours ago

on


Dublin, July 09, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The “Ai In Space Exploration Market Outlook 2025-2034: Market Share, and Growth Analysis By Type, By Application, By End-user” report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com’s offering.

Ai In Space Exploration Market is valued at USD 6.7 billion in 2025. Further the market is expected to grow by a CAGR of 27.1% to reach global sales of USD 57.9 billion in 2034

The AI in space exploration market is rapidly advancing, driven by the need for autonomous systems, data analysis, and efficient resource utilization in space missions. This market involves the application of artificial intelligence technologies, such as machine learning and computer vision, to optimize various aspects of space exploration. AI-powered solutions enable spacecraft to navigate autonomously, analyze planetary data, and perform complex tasks in remote environments. By analyzing data from sensors, telescopes, and rovers, AI can provide real-time insights into celestial bodies and space phenomena.

The scope of this market extends across various segments, including satellite operations, planetary exploration, and space logistics. The focus is on developing intelligent systems that can enhance mission efficiency, reduce costs, and improve scientific discovery. The adoption of AI is facilitating a shift from traditional, ground-controlled operations to autonomous, data-driven missions.

2024 has seen a surge in AI adoption within the space exploration industry, with a focus on autonomous navigation and data analysis. We’ve witnessed increased use of machine learning to analyze satellite imagery and identify celestial objects. The integration of AI with robotic rovers has improved their ability to navigate and perform scientific experiments autonomously.

Furthermore, there’s been a noticeable increase in the use of AI for optimizing satellite operations and predicting space weather. The development of AI-powered platforms for space debris tracking has also accelerated, enabling better collision avoidance. The use of AI for analyzing telescope data has improved astronomical discoveries. The use of AI for resource management on long duration missions has also increased.

Looking ahead to 2025 and beyond, the AI in space exploration market is expected to experience continued growth and innovation. We anticipate further advancements in autonomous space missions, with the development of self-repairing spacecraft and habitats. The integration of AI with quantum computing will enhance data processing and simulation capabilities. We also expect to see increased use of AI for automating complex tasks, such as asteroid mining and planetary colonization.

The rise of AI-powered space traffic management will drive the need for solutions that can optimize satellite orbits and avoid collisions. Furthermore, the focus will shift towards developing more explainable AI models, enhancing trust and transparency in AI-driven decisions. The use of AI for improving communication between deep space probes and earth will increase. We will also see increased focus on AI for developing closed loop life support systems.

Key Insights Ai In Space Exploration Market

  • Autonomous Navigation: AI enables spacecraft to navigate and perform tasks autonomously.
  • Data Analysis: AI analyzes satellite and rover data for scientific discovery.
  • Satellite Operations Optimization: AI optimizes satellite orbits and predicts space weather.
  • Space Debris Tracking: AI tracks and predicts space debris for collision avoidance.
  • Autonomous Missions: AI enables self-repairing spacecraft and habitats.
  • Need for Autonomous Operations: AI reduces reliance on ground control and improves mission efficiency.
  • Demand for Data Analysis: AI analyzes vast amounts of space data for scientific discovery.
  • Advancements in AI Technology: Improvements in machine learning and computer vision.
  • Increasing Space Missions: The growth of space missions drives demand for AI-powered solutions.
  • Reliability in Extreme Environments: Ensuring AI systems function reliably in harsh space environments.

Ai In Space Exploration Market Segmentation
By Type

  • Robotic Arms
  • Space Probes
  • Other Types

By Application

  • Remote Sensing and Monitoring
  • Data Analytics
  • Asteroid Mining
  • Manned Vehicles and Reusable Launch
  • Communications
  • Remote Missions

By End-user

By Geography

  • North America (USA, Canada, Mexico)
  • Europe (Germany, UK, France, Spain, Italy, Rest of Europe)
  • Asia-Pacific (China, India, Japan, Australia, Vietnam, Rest of APAC)
  • The Middle East and Africa (Middle East, Africa)
  • South and Central America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of SCA)

Ai In Space Exploration Market Analytics

The research analyses various direct and indirect forces that can impact the Ai In Space Exploration market supply and demand conditions. The parent market, derived market, intermediaries’ market are analyzed to evaluate the full supply chain and possible alternatives and substitutes. Geopolitical analysis, demographic analysis, and Porter’s five forces analysis are prudently assessed to estimate the best Ai In Space Exploration market projections.

Recent deals and developments are considered for their potential impact on Ai In Space Exploration’s future business. Other metrics analyzed include Threat of New Entrants, Threat of Substitutes, Degree of Competition, Number of Suppliers, Distribution Channel, Capital Needed, Entry Barriers, Govt. Regulations, Beneficial Alternative, and Cost of Substitute in Ai In Space Exploration Market.

Ai In Space Exploration trade and price analysis helps comprehend Ai In Space Exploration’s international market scenario with top exporters/suppliers and top importers/customer information. The data and analysis assist our clients in planning procurement, identifying potential vendors/clients to associate with, understanding Ai In Space Exploration price trends and patterns, and exploring new Ai In Space Exploration sales channels. The research will be updated to the latest month to include the impact of the latest developments such as the Russia-Ukraine war on the Ai In Space Exploration market.

Ai In Space Exploration Market Competitive Intelligence

The proprietary company’s revenue and product analysis model unveils the Ai In Space Exploration market structure and competitive landscape. Company profiles of key players with a business description, product portfolio, SWOT analysis, Financial Analysis, and key strategies are covered in the report. It identifies top-performing Ai In Space Exploration products in global and regional markets. New Product Launches, Investment & Funding updates, Mergers & Acquisitions, Collaboration & Partnership, Awards and Agreements, Expansion, and other developments give our clients the Ai In Space Exploration market update to stay ahead of the competition.

Company offerings in different segments across Asia-Pacific, Europe, Middle East, Africa, and South and Central America are presented to better understand the company strategy for the Ai In Space Exploration market. The competition analysis enables the user to assess competitor strategies and helps align their capabilities and resources for future growth prospects to improve their market share.

Your Takeaways From this Report

  • Global Ai In Space Exploration market size and growth projections (CAGR), 2024- 2034
  • Impact of recent changes in geopolitical, economic, and trade policies on the demand and supply chain of Ai In Space Exploration.
  • Ai In Space Exploration market size, share, and outlook across 5 regions and 27 countries, 2025- 2034.
  • Ai In Space Exploration market size, CAGR, and Market Share of key products, applications, and end-user verticals, 2025- 2034.
  • Short and long-term Ai In Space Exploration market trends, drivers, restraints, and opportunities.
  • Porter’s Five Forces analysis, Technological developments in the Ai In Space Exploration market, Ai In Space Exploration supply chain analysis.
  • Ai In Space Exploration trade analysis, Ai In Space Exploration market price analysis, Ai In Space Exploration Value Chain Analysis.
  • Profiles of 5 leading companies in the industry- overview, key strategies, financials, and products.
  • Latest Ai In Space Exploration market news and developments.

Region-level intelligence includes

  • North America Ai In Space Exploration Market Size, Share, Growth Trends, CAGR Forecast to 2034
  • Europe Ai In Space Exploration Market Size, Share, Growth Trends, CAGR Outlook to 2034
  • Asia-Pacific Ai In Space Exploration Industry Data, Market Size, Competition, Opportunities, CAGR Forecast to 2034
  • The Middle East and Africa Ai In Space Exploration Industry Data, Market Size, Competition, Opportunities, CAGR Forecast to 2034
  • South and Central America Ai In Space Exploration IndustryIndustry Data, Market Size, Competition, Opportunities, CAGR Forecast to 2034

Ai In Space Exploration market regional insights present the most promising markets to invest in and emerging markets to expand to contemporary regulations to adhere to and players to partner with.

Key Attributes:

Report Attribute Details
No. of Pages 150
Forecast Period 2025 – 2034
Estimated Market Value (USD) in 2025 $6.7 Billion
Forecasted Market Value (USD) by 2034 $57.9 Billion
Compound Annual Growth Rate 27.1%
Regions Covered Global

Key Topics Covered:

1. List of Tables and Figures

2. Ai In Space Exploration Market Latest Trends, Drivers and Challenges, 2025-2034
2.1 Ai In Space Exploration Market Overview
2.2 Market Strategies of Leading Ai In Space Exploration Companies
2.3 Ai In Space Exploration Market Insights, 2025-2034
2.3.1 Leading Ai In Space Exploration Types, 2025-2034
2.3.2 Leading Ai In Space Exploration End-User industries, 2025-2034
2.3.3 Fast-Growing countries for Ai In Space Exploration sales, 2025-2034
2.4 Ai In Space Exploration Market Drivers and Restraints
2.4.1 Ai In Space Exploration Demand Drivers to 2034
2.4.2 Ai In Space Exploration Challenges to 2034
2.5 Ai In Space Exploration Market- Five Forces Analysis
2.5.1 Ai In Space Exploration Industry Attractiveness Index, 2024
2.5.2 Threat of New Entrants
2.5.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
2.5.4 Bargaining Power of Buyers
2.5.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
2.5.6 Threat of Substitutes

3. Global Ai In Space Exploration Market Value, Market Share, and Forecast to 2034
3.1 Global Ai In Space Exploration Market Overview, 2024
3.2 Global Ai In Space Exploration Market Revenue and Forecast, 2025-2034 (US$ Billion)
3.3 Global Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Product Type, 2025-2034
3.4 Global Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Application, 2025-2034
3.5 Global Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Technology, 2025-2034
3.6 Global Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By End User, 2025-2034
3.7 Global Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By End User, 2025-2034
3.8 Global Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook by Region, 2025-2034

4. Asia Pacific Ai In Space Exploration Market Value, Market Share and Forecast to 2034
4.1 Asia Pacific Ai In Space Exploration Market Overview, 2024
4.2 Asia Pacific Ai In Space Exploration Market Revenue and Forecast, 2025-2034 (US$ Billion)
4.3 Asia Pacific Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Product Type, 2025-2034
4.4 Asia Pacific Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Application, 2025-2034
4.5 Asia Pacific Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Technology, 2025-2034
4.6 Asia Pacific Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By End User, 2025-2034
4.7 Asia Pacific Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook by Country, 2025-2034
4.8 Key Companies in Asia Pacific Ai In Space Exploration Market

5. Europe Ai In Space Exploration Market Value, Market Share, and Forecast to 2034
5.1 Europe Ai In Space Exploration Market Overview, 2024
5.2 Europe Ai In Space Exploration Market Revenue and Forecast, 2025-2034 (US$ Billion)
5.3 Europe Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Product Type, 2025-2034
5.4 Europe Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Application, 2025-2034
5.5 Europe Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Technology, 2025-2034
5.6 Europe Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By End User, 2025-2034
5.7 Europe Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook by Country, 2025-2034
5.8 Key Companies in Europe Ai In Space Exploration Market

6. North America Ai In Space Exploration Market Value, Market Share and Forecast to 2034
6.1 North America Ai In Space Exploration Market Overview, 2024
6.2 North America Ai In Space Exploration Market Revenue and Forecast, 2025-2034 (US$ Billion)
6.3 North America Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Product Type, 2025-2034
6.4 North America Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Application, 2025-2034
6.5 North America Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Technology, 2025-2034
6.6 North America Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By End User, 2025-2034
6.7 North America Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook by Country, 2025-2034
6.8 Key Companies in North America Ai In Space Exploration Market

7. South and Central America Ai In Space Exploration Market Value, Market Share and Forecast to 2034
7.1 South and Central America Ai In Space Exploration Market Overview, 2024
7.2 South and Central America Ai In Space Exploration Market Revenue and Forecast, 2025-2034 (US$ Billion)
7.3 South and Central America Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Product Type, 2025-2034
7.4 South and Central America Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Application, 2025-2034
7.5 South and Central America Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Technology, 2025-2034
7.6 South and Central America Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By End User, 2025-2034
7.7 South and Central America Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook by Country, 2025-2034
7.8 Key Companies in South and Central America Ai In Space Exploration Market

8. Middle East Africa Ai In Space Exploration Market Value, Market Share and Forecast to 2034
8.1 Middle East Africa Ai In Space Exploration Market Overview, 2024
8.2 Middle East and Africa Ai In Space Exploration Market Revenue and Forecast, 2025-2034 (US$ Billion)
8.3 Middle East Africa Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Product Type, 2025-2034
8.4 Middle East Africa Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Application, 2025-2034
8.5 Middle East Africa Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By Technology, 2025-2034
8.6 Middle East Africa Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook By End User, 2025-2034
8.7 Middle East Africa Ai In Space Exploration Market Size and Share Outlook by Country, 2025-2034
8.8 Key Companies in Middle East Africa Ai In Space Exploration Market

9. Ai In Space Exploration Market Structure
9.1 Key Players
9.2 Ai In Space Exploration Companies – Key Strategies and Financial Analysis
9.2.1 Snapshot
9.2.3 Business Description
9.2.4 Products and Services
9.2.5 Financial Analysis

10. Ai In Space Exploration Industry Recent Developments

11 Appendix
11.1 Publisher Expertise
11.2 Research Methodology
11.3 Annual Subscription Plans
11.4 Contact Information

Companies Featured

  • Lockheed Martin
  • Airbus
  • IBM
  • Northrup Grumman
  • Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
  • Thales Group
  • Booz Allen Hamilton
  • Spacex
  • Maxar Technologies Inc.
  • Astroscale
  • Planet Labs Inc.
  • Spire Global
  • Iceye
  • Capella Space
  • Blacksky Global
  • Hawkeye 360
  • D-Orbit
  • Orbital Insight Inc.
  • LeoLabs
  • Slingshot Aerospace
  • Kuva Space
  • Analytical Space
  • Raptor Maps
  • Phase Four
  • Descartes Labs
  • AADYAH Aerospace
  • Ubotica Technologies
  • Swarm Technologies
  • Exo-Space
  • Craft Prospec

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/j78ddt

About ResearchAndMarkets.com
ResearchAndMarkets.com is the world’s leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.



Source link

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tools & Platforms

Polimorphic Raises $18.6M as It Beefs Up Public-Sector AI

Published

35 minutes ago

on

July 9, 2025

By


The latest best on public-sector AI involves Polimorphic, which has raised $18.6 million in a Series A funding round led by General Catalyst.

The round also included M13 and Shine.

The company raised $5.6 million in a seed round in late 2023.


New York-based Polimorphic sells such products as artificial intelligence-backed chatbots and search tools, voice AI for calls, constituent relationship management (CRM) and workflow software, and permitting and licensing tech.

The new capital will go toward tripling the company’s sales and engineering staff and building more AI product features.

For instance, that includes the continued development of the voice AI offering, which can now work with live data — a bonus when it comes to utility billing — and even informs callers to animal services which pets might be up for adoption, CEO and co-founder Parth Shah told Government Technology in describing his vision for such tech.

The company also wants to bring more AI to CRM and workflow software to help catch errors on applications and other paperwork earlier than before, Shah said.

“We are more than just a chatbot,” he said.

Challenges of public-sector AI include making sure that public agencies truly understand the technology and are “not just slapping AI on what you already do,” Shah said.

As he sees it, working in governments in such a way has helped Polimorphic to nearly double its customer count every six months. The company has more than 200 public-sector departments at the city, county and state levels using the company’s products, he said — and such growth is among the reasons the company attracted this new round of investment.

The company’s general sales pitch is increasingly familiar to public-sector tech buyers: Software and AI can help agencies deal with “repetitive, manual tasks, including answering the same questions by phone and email,” according to a statement, and help people find civic and bureaucratic information more quickly.

For instance, the company says it has helped customers reduce voicemails by up to 90 percent, with walk-in requests cut by 75 percent. Polimorphic clients include the city of Pacifica, Calif.; Tooele County, Utah; Polk County, N.C.; and the town of Palm Beach, Fla.

The fresh funding also will help the company expand in the company’s top markets, which include Wisconsin, New Jersey, North Carolina, Texas, Florida and California.

The company’s investors are familiar to the gov tech industry. Earlier this year, for example, General Catalyst led an $80 million Series C funding round for Prepared, a public safety tech supplier focused on bringing more assistive AI capabilities to emergency dispatch.

“Polimorphic has the potential to become the next modern system of record for local and state government. Historically, it’s been difficult to drive adoption of these foundational platforms beyond traditional ERP and accounting in the public sector,” said Sreyas Misra, partner at General Catalyst, in the statement. “AI is the jet fuel that accelerates this adoption.”

Thad Rueter writes about the business of government technology. He covered local and state governments for newspapers in the Chicago area and Florida, as well as e-commerce, digital payments and related topics for various publications. He lives in Wisconsin.

See More Stories by Thad Rueter





Source link

Continue Reading

Tools & Platforms

AI enters the classroom as law schools prep students for a tech-driven practice

Published

1 hour ago

on

July 9, 2025

By


When it comes to using artificial intelligence in legal education and beyond, the key is thoughtful integration.

“Think of it like a sandwich,” said Dyane O’Leary, professor at Suffolk University Law School. “The student must be the bread on both sides. What the student puts in, and how the output is assessed, matters more than the tool in the middle.”

Suffolk Law is taking a forward-thinking approach to integrating generative AI into legal education starting with requiring an AI course for all first-year students to equip them to use AI, understand it and critique it as future lawyers.

O’Leary, a long-time advocate for legal technology, said there is a need to balance foundational skills with exposure to cutting-edge tools.

“Some schools are ignoring both ends of the AI sandwich,” she said. “Others don’t have the resources to do much at the upper level.”

Professor Dyane O’Leary, director of Suffolk University Law School’s Legal Innovation & Technology Center, teaches a generative AI course in which students assess the ethics of AI in the legal context and, after experimentation, assess the strengths and weaknesses of various AI tools for a range of legal tasks.

One major initiative at Suffolk Law is the partnership with Hotshot, a video-based learning platform used by top law firms, corporate lawyers and litigators.

“The Hotshot content is a series of asynchronous modules tailored for 1Ls,” O’Leary said, “The goal is not for our students to become tech experts but to understand the usage and implication of AI in the legal profession.”

The Hotshot material provides a practical introduction to large language models, explains why generative AI differs from tools students are used to, and uses real-world examples from industry professionals to build credibility and interest.

This structured introduction lays the groundwork for more interactive classroom work when students begin editing and analyzing AI-generated legal content. Students will explore where the tool succeeded, where it failed and why.

“We teach students to think critically,” O’Leary said. “There needs to be an understanding of why AI missed a counterargument or produced a junk rule paragraph.”

These exercises help students learn that AI can support brainstorming and outlining but isn’t yet reliable for final drafting or legal analysis.

Suffolk Law is one of several law schools finding creative ways to bring AI into the classroom — without losing sight of the basics. Whether it’s through required 1L courses, hands-on tools or new certificate programs, the goal is to help students think critically and stay ready for what’s next.

Proactive online learning

Case Western Reserve University School of Law has also taken a proactive step to ensure that all its students are equipped to meet the challenge. In partnership with Wickard.ai, the school recently launched a comprehensive AI training program, making it a mandatory component for the entire first-year class.

“We knew AI was going to change things in legal education and in lawyering,” said Jennifer Cupar, professor of lawyering skills and director of the school’s Legal Writing, Leadership, Experiential Learning, Advocacy, and Professionalism program. “By working with Wickard.ai, we were able to offer training to the entire 1L class and extend the opportunity to the rest of the law school community.”

The program included pre-class assignments, live instruction, guest speakers and hands-on exercises. Students practiced crafting prompts and experimenting with various AI platforms. The goal was to familiarize students with tools such as ChatGPT and encourage a thoughtful, critical approach to their use in legal settings.

Oliver Roberts, CEO and co-founder of Wickard.ai, led the sessions and emphasized the importance of responsible use.

While CWRU Law, like many law schools, has general prohibitions against AI use in drafting assignments, faculty are encouraged to allow exceptions and to guide students in exploring AI’s capabilities responsibly.

“This is a practice-readiness issue,” Cupar said. “Just like Westlaw and Lexis changed legal research, AI is going to be part of legal work going forward. Our students need to understand it now.”

Balanced approach

Starting with the Class of 2025, Washington University School of Law is embedding generative AI instruction into its first-year Legal Research curriculum. The goal is to ensure that every 1L student gains fluency in both traditional legal research methods and emerging AI tools.

Delivered as a yearlong, one-credit course, the revamped curriculum maintains a strong emphasis on core legal research fundamentals, including court hierarchy, the distinction between binding and persuasive authority, primary and secondary sources and effective strategies for researching legislative and regulatory history.

WashU Law is integrating AI as a tool to be used critically and effectively, not as a replacement for human legal reasoning.

Students receive hands-on training in legal-specific generative AI platforms and develop the skills needed to evaluate AI-generated results, detect hallucinated or inaccurate content, and compare outcomes with traditional research methods.

“WashU Law incorporates AI while maintaining the basics of legal research,” said Peter Hook,associate dean. “By teaching the basics, we teach the skills necessary to evaluate whether AI-produced legal research results are any good.”

Stefanie Lindquist, dean of WashU Law, said this balanced approach preserves the rigor and depth that legal employers value.

“The addition of AI instruction further sharpens that edge by equipping students with the ability to responsibly and strategically apply new technologies in a professional context,” Lindquist said.

Forward-thinking vision

Drake University Law School has launched a new AI Law Certificate Program for J.D. students.

The program is a response to the growing need for legal professionals who understand both the promise and complexity of AI.

Designed for completion during a student’s second and third years, the certificate program emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration, drawing on expertise from across Drake Law School’s campus, including computer science, art and the Institute for Justice Reform & Innovation.

Students will engage with advanced topics such as machine vision and trademark law, quantum computing and cybersecurity, and the broader ethical and regulatory challenges posed by AI.

Roscoe Jones, Jr., dean of Drake Law School, said the AI Law Certificate empowers students to lead at the intersection of law and technology, whether in private practice, government, nonprofit, policymaking or academia.

“Artificial Intelligence is not just changing industries; it’s reshaping governance, ethics and the very framework of legal systems,” he said. 

Simulated, but realistic

Suffolk Law has also launched an online platform that allows students to practice negotiation skills with AI bots programmed to simulate the behavior of seasoned attorneys.

“They’re not scripted. They’re human-like,” she said. “Sometimes polite, sometimes bananas. It mimics real negotiation.”

These interactive experiences in either text or voice mode allow students to practice handling the messiness of legal dialogue, which is an experience hard to replicate with static casebooks or classroom hypotheticals.

Unlike overly accommodating AI assistants, these bots shift tactics and strategies, mirroring the adaptive nature of real-world legal negotiators.

Another tool on the platform supports oral argument prep. Created by Suffolk Law’s legal writing team in partnership with the school’s litigation lab, the AI mock judge engages students in real-time argument rehearsals, asking follow-up questions and testing their case theories.

“It’s especially helpful for students who don’t get much out of reading their outline alone,” O’Leary said. “It makes the lights go on.”

O’Leary also emphasizes the importance of academic integrity. Suffolk Law has a default policy that prohibits use of generative AI on assignments unless a professor explicitly allows it. Still, she said the policy is evolving.

“You can’t ignore the equity issues,” she said, pointing to how students often get help from lawyers in the family or paid tutors. “To prohibit [AI] entirely is starting to feel unrealistic.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Tools & Platforms

Microsoft pushes billions at AI education for the masses • The Register

Published

2 hours ago

on

July 9, 2025

By


After committing more than $13 billion in strategic investments to OpenAI, Microsoft is splashing out billions more to get people using the technology.

On Wednesday, Redmond announced a $4 billion donation of cash and technology to schools and non-profits over the next five years. It’s branding this philanthropic mission as Microsoft Elevate, which is billed as “providing people and organizations with AI skills and tools to thrive in an AI-powered economy.” It will also start the AI Economy Institute (AIEI), a so-called corporate think tank stocked with academics that will be publishing research on how the workforce needs to adapt to AI tech.

The bulk of the money will go toward AI and cloud credits for K-12 schools and community colleges, and Redmond claims 20 million people will “earn an in-demand AI skilling credential” under the scheme, although Microsoft’s record on such vendor-backed certifications is hardly spotless.

“Working in close coordination with other groups across Microsoft, including LinkedIn and GitHub, Microsoft Elevate will deliver AI education and skilling at scale,” said Brad Smith, president and vice chair of Microsoft Corporation, in a blog post. “And it will work as an advocate for public policies around the world to advance AI education and training for others.”

It’s not an entirely new scheme – Redmond already had its Microsoft Philanthropies and Tech for Social Impact charitable organizations, but they are now merging into Elevate. Smith noted Microsoft has already teamed up with North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany to train students on AI, and says similar partnerships across the US education system will follow.

Microsoft is also looking to recruit teachers to the cause.

On Tuesday, Microsoft, along with Anthropic and OpenAI, said it was starting the National Academy for AI Instruction with the American Federation of Teachers to train teachers in AI skills and to pass them on to the next generation. The scheme has received $23 million in funding from the tech giants spread over five years, and aims to train 400,000 teachers at training centers across the US and online.

“AI holds tremendous promise but huge challenges—and it’s our job as educators to make sure AI serves our students and society, not the other way around,” said AFT President Randi Weingarten in a canned statement.

“The direct connection between a teacher and their kids can never be replaced by new technologies, but if we learn how to harness it, set commonsense guardrails and put teachers in the driver’s seat, teaching and learning can be enhanced.”

Meanwhile, the AIEI will sponsor and convene researchers to produce publications, including policy briefs and research reports, on applying AI skills in the workforce, leveraging a global network of academic partners.

Hopefully they can do a better job of it than Redmond’s own staff. After 9,000 layoffs from Microsoft earlier this month, largely in the Xbox division, Matt Turnbull, an executive producer at Xbox Game Studios Publishing, went viral with a spectacularly tone-deaf LinkedIn post (now removed) to former staff members offering AI prompts “to help reduce the emotional and cognitive load that comes with job loss.” ®



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending