Connect with us

Education

Letting AI think for us will destroy the purpose of education

Published

on


Mike Tyson, in his characteristic bluntness, distilled it further: “Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.” And Dwight Eisenhower, the architect of World War II’s D-Day, offered a gentler and more profound version: “Plans are useless, but planning is indispensable.” 

Also Read: Campus conundrum: Educators lack clarity on how to deal with AI in classrooms

These words resonate far beyond  battlefields and boxing rings—even in the world of education. 

Over the past decades, a minor industry has emerged around pre-packaged lesson plans for teachers. These are meticulously structured templates, detailing how a teacher should conduct a class—what to say, when to say it, even how students might respond. 

The actors in this space range from well-intentioned education reformers to commercial entities selling ‘teacher efficiency’ tools. Yet, these efforts are largely futile. Not necessarily because the plans are poorly designed, but because they misunderstand the essence of teaching. 

A lesson plan in the hands of a teacher who did not create it is like a battle strategy handed to a commander who wasn’t part of its formulation and so does not understand the variables involved. 

The real value lies not in the plan itself, but in the act of planning. This means wrestling with questions like: How will my students react? Who will respond in what manner and then what should I do? Which ones have the requisite prior knowledge? What misconceptions might arise or are already held? How do I adapt if they don’t grasp the concept? What tools do I have? 

Also Read: Education crisis: Don’t let fads disrupt the fundamentals of learning

A teacher who has thought through these variables can improvise, adjust and even change course when reality inevitably diverges from the script. But a teacher handed a ready-made plan is often useless at best and sometimes prone to dysfunctional teaching, as such a plan can lock a teacher into certain patterns of behaviour and response. 

This dynamic is now mutating—rapidly and perhaps dangerously—with the rise of large language model-based AI systems. Lesson plans, teaching materials and entire course structures can now be generated in seconds. And this isn’t just happening in the commercial sector; teachers themselves are doing it, particularly in higher education. Some faculty members have quietly been outsourcing their thinking to AI. To them, it seems like efficiency. Why spend hours crafting a lecture when ChatGPT can draft one in minutes? But this is the thin end of the wedge. If your job is to develop the capacity to think, and you outsource your own, where does that leave your professional role? 

This is ironically symbiotic with another widespread trend: students using AI to outsource their learning. Assignments, essays and solutions to problem sets can now be generated with minimal effort. The traditional ‘take-home’ assignment is effectively dead in many institutions. And let’s be honest—most of us, as students, would have done the same. If an AI bot can write your essay in 30 seconds, why spend three hours? But this defeats the entire purpose of education: to develop the capacity to think. 

Also Read: The great AI reboot: Educators, techies and leaders all need to adapt fast

This shift is spreading exponentially, like a pandemic of outsourced thinking. Schools, with their naturally younger age groups, less resources and tighter oversight, are somewhat insulated, but higher education is compromised. No one knows the full extent yet, but the implications are dire. We are witnessing the unmaking of education’s core function. If teachers and students stop thinking, what remains? 

So, where does all this leave us? If both teachers and students are circumventing the essential hard work of thought, what is education for? A partial solution—unpleasant but necessary—is a return to in-person assessments: supervised exams, vivas and live discussions. There is no shortcut here. If we want to ensure that learning happens, we must watch it happen. 

Eisenhower was right: Planning matters, not the plan. The process of wrestling with ideas, anticipating challenges and adapting—that’s where most real learning happens. Like pre-made lesson plans, AI can be a tool, but it must never impinge on the core of education. Unfortunately, the human tendency to follow the easier path propels the reckless use of AI at the core of education. And used recklessly, AI does not aid  education but destroy it. 

The only way forward is to affirm the value of struggle in education. We must expect students to understand and act accordingly, but we must anticipate they will not. Too many of them will take the easier path. So, this must be the professional-ethical commitment of teaching as an institutional system. Use AI sparingly, prudently and only where no harm is done to the process and goals of education. And at every step, we  must reaffirm that thinking can be exhilarating but is also hard. 

Teaching, likewise, can be fulfilling but is hard. Learning can be fun, but  is hard. And that’s the whole point of education. 

The author is CEO of Azim Premji Foundation.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Education

Anthropic Continue The Push For AI In Education

Published

on


Let’s be honest. AI has already taken a seat in the classroom. Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Anthropic have all been pushing hard. Today brings more announcements from Athropic, the company behind the AI chatbot Claude, adding even more momentum. The shift isn’t subtle anymore. It’s fast, loud and it’s happening whether schools are ready or not.

It’s not only big tech. The U.S. government is also driving efforts to integrate A1 into education.

The Balance of Innovation and Safety

There’s real concern, and for good reason. Sure, the benefits are hard to ignore. AI tutoring, lighter workloads for teachers, more personalized learning paths for students. It all sounds great. But there’s a flip side. Missteps here could make existing education gaps worse. And once the damage is done, it’s tough to undo.

Many policymakers are stepping in early. They’re drafting ethical guardrails, pushing for equitable access, and starting to fund research into what responsible use of AI in education really looks like. Not as a PR move, but because the stakes are very real.

Meanwhile, the tech companies are sprinting. Google is handing out AI tools for schools at no cost, clearly aiming for reach. The strategy is simple: remove barriers and get in early. Just yesterday Microsoft, OpenAI, and Anthropic teamed up to build a national AI academy for teachers. An acknowledgment that it’s not the tools, but the people using them, that determine success. Teachers aren’t optional in this equation. They’re central.

Claude’s New Education Efforts

Claude for Education’s recent moves highlight what effective integration could look like. Its Canvas integration means students don’t need to log into another platform or juggle windows. Claude just works inside what they’re already using. That kind of invisible tech, could be the kind that sticks.

Then there’s the Panopto partnership. Students can now access lecture transcripts directly in their Claude conversations. Ask a question about a concept from class and Claude can pull the relevant sections right away. No need to rewatch an entire lecture or scrub through timestamps. It’s like giving every student their own research assistant.

And they’ve gone further. Through Wiley, Claude can now pull from a massive library of peer-reviewed academic sources. That’s huge. AI tools are often criticized for producing shaky or misleading information. But with access to vetted, high-quality content, Claude’s answers become more trustworthy. In a world overflowing with misinformation, that matters more than ever.

Josh Jarrett, senior vice president of AI growth at Wiley, emphasized this: “The future of research depends on keeping high-quality, peer-reviewed content central to AI-powered discovery. This partnership sets the standard for integrating trusted scientific content with AI platforms.”

Claude for Education are building a grassroots movement on campuses, too. Their student ambassador program is growing fast and new Claude Builder Clubs are popping up at universities around the world. Rather than being coding bootcamps or formal classes, they’re open spaces where students explore what they can actually make with AI. Workshops, demo nights and group builds.

These clubs are for everyone. Not just computer science majors. Claude’s tools are accessible enough that students in any field, from philosophy to marketing, can start building. That kind of openness helps make AI feel less like elite tech and more like something anyone can use creatively.

Privacy is a big theme here, too. Claude seems to be doing things right. Conversations are private, they’re not used for model training and any data-sharing with schools requires formal approvals.cStudents need to feel safe using AI tools. Without that trust, none of this works long term.

At the University of San Francisco School of Law, students are working with Claude to analyze legal arguments, map evidence and prep for trial scenarios. This is critical training for the jobs they’ll have after graduation. In the UK, Northumbria University is also leaning in. Their focus is on equity, digital access and preparing students for a workplace that’s already being shaped by AI

Graham Wynn, vice-chancellor for education at Northumbria University, puts the ethical side of AI front and center: “The availability of secure and ethical AI tools is a
significant consideration for our applicants, and our investment in Claude for Education
will position Northumbria as a forward-thinking leader in ethical AI innovation.”

They see tools like Claude not just as educational add-ons, but as part of a broader strategy to drive social mobility and reduce digital poverty. If you’re serious about AI in education, that’s the level of thinking it takes.

Avoiding Complexity and Closing Gaps

The core truth here is simple. AI’s role in education is growing whether we plan for it or not. The technology is getting more capable. The infrastructure is being built. But what still needs to grow, is a culture of responsible use. The challenge for education isn’t chasing an even smarter tool, but ensuring the tools we have serve all students equally.

That means listening to educators. It means designing for inclusion from the ground up. It means making sure AI becomes something that empowers students, not just another layer of complexity.

The next few years will shape everything. If we get this right, AI could help close long-standing gaps in education. If we don’t, we risk deepening them in ways we’ll regret later.

This is more than a tech story. It’s a human one. And the decisions being made today will echo for a long time.



Source link

Continue Reading

Education

AI can access your school courses

Published

on


Using genAI software like ChatGPT for school makes perfect sense, considering how sophisticated the software has become. It’s not about cheating on exams or having the AI do your homework, though some people will use it that way. It’s about having an AI tutor that understands natural language and can guide you while you learn.

It’s like taking your professors home with you to explain the topics you’re still struggling with. Combined with human teachers, AI tools can make a real difference in education.

OpenAI is already working on a ChatGPT Study Together model that will act as an AI tutor, but you don’t have to wait for that product to launch. Anthropic is already ahead, having released a Claude for Education product back in April.

The AI firm is now ready to give Claude for Education a major upgrade. Anthropic on Wednesday announced new tools for Claude that let the AI access school courses and materials more easily, along with new university partnerships that will bring Claude to even more students.

Canvas, Panopto, and Wiley support

The current Learning Mode experience in Claude for Education involves turning the AI into a teacher-like persona. Instead of providing direct answers or solutions, Claude uses Socratic questioning to help students find the answers on their own.

“How would you approach this problem?” or “What evidence supports your conclusions?” are examples of questions Claude will ask in this mode.

Using Claude for Education with Canvas. Image source: Anthropic

The July update will let users give Claude more context by connecting it to three student-friendly data sources: Canvas, Panopto, and Wiley.

Claude will use MCP servers to gather information from Panopto, and Wiley. Panopto offers lecture transcripts. Wiley provides access to peer-reviewed content that can support learning with Claude.

Canvas contains course materials. Claude will also support Canvas LTI (Learning Tools Interoperability), letting students use the AI directly within their Canvas courses.

New partnerships

Anthropic also announced two new partnerships with “forward-thinking institutions” that want to give students access to AI tools built for education. These schools are the University of San Francisco School of Law and Northumbria University.

The former is especially notable in a world where some lawyers have used AI in legal matters, only for it to fumble legal citations. Future lawyers need to learn how AI can be used effectively and where its limits are.

Dean Johanna Kalb explained how Claude will be used at the University of San Francisco School of Law to actually help students:

We’re excited to introduce students to the practical use of LLMs in litigation. One way we’re doing this is through our Evidence course, where this fall, students will gain direct experience applying LLMs to analyze claims and defenses, map evidence to elements of each cause of action, identify evidentiary gaps to inform discovery, and develop strategies for admission and exclusion of evidence at trial.

That’s certainly better than having genAI write your legal documents and risk hallucinating key details.

Finally, Anthropic is expanding its student ambassadors program, giving more passionate students the chance to contribute to the Claude community. Claude Builder Clubs will launch on campuses around the world, offering hackathons, workshops, and demo nights for students interested in AI.



Source link

Continue Reading

Education

HBK trustee Harsh Kapadia shares vision for AI in education

Published

on


New Delhi [India], July 9: Harsh Kapadia, Trustee of The HB Kapadia New High School, represented the institution at the prestigious Economic Times Annual Education Summit 2025 in New Delhi. The summit, themed “Fuelling the Education Economy with AI: The India Story”, brought together some of the country’s most influential voices in education, technology, and policymaking.

Sharing the stage with national leaders such as Sanjay Jain, Head of Google for Education, India, Aanchal Chopra, Regional Head, North, LinkedIn, Shishir Jaipuria, Chairman of Jaipuria Group of Schools, and Shantanu Prakash, Founder of Millennium Schools, Mr. Kapadia highlighted the critical role of Artificial Intelligence in shaping the future of Indian education.

In his remarks, Mr. Kapadia emphasised the urgent need to integrate AI into mainstream schooling. He also said that this will begin not with advanced algorithms but with teachers.

“AI does not begin with algorithms. It begins with empowered educators,” he said, calling for schools to prioritise teacher readiness alongside technological upgrades.

He elaborated on HBK’s progressive steps under its FuturEdge Program, a future-readiness initiative that integrates academics with emerging technologies and life skills.

“Artificial Intelligence will soon be as essential to education as electricity and the internet,” he said, emphasising that while AI is a powerful technological tool, its greatest impact lies in how teachers and students use it collaboratively. He noted that AI won’t replace teachers, but teachers who use AI will replace those who don’t.

His recommendations included weekly AI training periods for teachers, AI-infused school curriculum, infrastructure upgrades, and cross-industry collaborations to expose students to real-world applications of AI.

Mr. Kapadia shared that HBK has already begun incorporating AI into its school assemblies and is planning to introduce a dedicated “AI Period” in the academic calendar. The school is also conceptualising an annual “AI Fest” for students, where innovation and problem-solving will take centre stage. In terms of infrastructure, the school is actively upgrading classrooms with AI-enabled digital panels and computer labs designed for hands-on learning.

Calling for greater collaboration between schools and industry, Mr. Kapadia also proposed regular expert-led sessions with professionals from Google, LinkedIn, IBM, and AI startups.

Concluding his address, he reaffirmed HBK’s commitment to pioneering responsible and human-centred use of technology in education, saying, “AI is not a separate subject. It is a way of thinking, creating, and teaching. If we want future-ready students, we must begin with future-ready schools.”

 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending