Education
AI integration drives new approaches in isle education
As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in classrooms and at home, educators across Hawaii say the rise of personalized learning is beginning to reshape how students learn, and in some cases, whether they attend traditional schools at all.
Justin Lai, an educational technologist at La Pietra — Hawai’i School for Girls, describes AI as a powerful partner for both teachers and students by supporting creativity, closing knowledge gaps and helping to organize complex information.
Lai said La Pietra uses AI as a tool to help students generate ideas and create content, as a way to provide individualized academic support, and as a resource to help organize and make sense of complex information. Students use AI to brainstorm ideas, translate difficult concepts and manage overwhelming research tasks, while teachers are beginning to integrate curriculum content into AI platforms to create customized, interactive learning experiences.
Still, Lai emphasized that keeping pace with AI’s rapid evolution is a challenge even for those deeply immersed in the field. Because students are already using AI tools at home — often beyond the reach of school policies — he said schools must engage in open, community-wide communication.
La Pietra is actively exploring how AI can serve as a creative collaborator in design thinking and accelerate project research.
One promising example, according to Lai, is “vibe coding,” an emerging practice where students use AI to develop software more easily and intuitively.
“Students can learn to adaptively use new technology while applying skills in relevant contexts,” Lai said, noting that such innovation is especially important in Hawaii, where communities grapple with high living costs, environmental concerns and talent retention.
Ultimately, he believes the schools best positioned to thrive will be those that use AI “to enhance human connection and community engagement, not replace it.”
The Hawaii Association of Independent Schools has seen surging interest in AI training across its membership.
“It’s been the No. 1 requested area of professional development by our schools,” said Deanna D’Olier, HAIS executive director-elect. She added that AI integration in the classroom is not just about efficiency, it’s about access and support.
“My hope is that AI is a supplement to school,” D’Olier said. “It helps keep learning moving in real time in ways that are incredibly difficult for any person to do, given the demands of traditional schooling.”
Homeschooling support
The emergence of AI as an educational tool coincides with the rise in home-schooling. A reason is that technology, and increasingly AI, is making the practice more viable and effective, according to D’Olier.
According to the Johns Hopkins School of Education, the number of home-schooled students across the U.S. grew during the 2023–2024 school year even as the overall K–12 population declined due to falling birth rates.
In Hawaii, home-school participation spiked during the COVID- 19 pandemic and has remained significantly higher than pre-COVID levels, though still a small percentage of all school-age children.
In the 2008-2009 school year, 1,555 students in Hawaii were reported as home-schooled. That number hit 6,438 in 2020-2021, representing just 2.7% of Hawaii’s K-12 students.
For the just-ended 2024-2025 school year, 4,161 Hawaii students were home-schooled, down from the peak but still nearly triple the number from 15 years ago.
D’Olier said the home-schooling trend in Hawaii mirrors the national movement but is also shaped by local dynamics, particularly for student athletes, military families or those seeking flexible or specialized learning environments.
“By home-schooling your child, you can (teach them) anywhere,” she said. “You’re not tethered to the brick and mortar.”
Families may also choose home-schooling for academic, social-emotional or financial reasons, particularly if they lack access to a school that meets their needs but cannot afford private tuition, which continues to increase due to inflation.
The rise in AI tools also has provided more support for home-school parents and students. These tools are making it easier for both home-schooled and traditionally enrolled students to get tailored academic support and explore subjects more deeply on their own time.
“AI will inevitably help keep students on pace with their learning,” D’Olier said. “It can serve as kind of that private tutor … helping them better understand whatever it is they’re covering.”
New tools like Khan Academy’s AI-powered learning guide, Khanmigo, allow students to receive real-time academic support, ask questions, and stay on track — even without a traditional classroom structure. Khanmigo acts like a personal tutor and coach, helping students brainstorm ideas, work through math problems step by step and explore subjects through guided conversation.
The platform is free for teachers, while families can subscribe for $4 per month to gain full access at home.
The Curipod Classroom is an AI-powered lesson platform that lets teachers create interactive, standards-aligned lessons with slides, polls and activities on any topic and in any language, while giving students real-time, personalized feedback to boost engagement and learning.
OpenAI’s ChatGPT, already widely used by teens, can help students brainstorm ideas, summarize reading material, draft essays, solve math problems or translate difficult concepts into plain language.
In traditional schools
The state Department of Education has been actively integrating AI to improve both teaching efficiency and student learning outcomes.
DOE describes artificial intelligence as technology that can predict outcomes, make suggestions or help with decisions based on goals set by humans — following the definition laid out in the 2020 National Artificial Intelligence Act.
AI is used in public schools to automate tasks like grading and lesson planning and support personalized tutoring for students. Through a cross-office collaboration model, the department has launched a public-facing AI website, initiated professional development sessions, and is running pilot programs such as MagicSchool to test AI tools in classrooms.
At the private Mid-Pacific Institute in Manoa Valley, preparations for AI integration began just months after ChatGPT’s public release in November 2022. The school established an AI Council made up of educators, students and industry professionals to help shape its approach, and began rolling out professional development for teachers at all grade levels.
“We knew that we needed to up-skill our teachers as quickly as possible,” said Brian Grantham, Mid-Pacific’s director of educational technology.
Mid-Pacific’s focus ranges from building AI literacy across all grades — helping students understand what AI is, how it works, the potential biases and errors in AI outputs, and the importance of validating those outputs — and developing AI certification classes open to faculty from any school.
“Most importantly, we knew that we needed to show our students and teachers myriad ways AI platforms could be leveraged to deepen their subject matter understanding, compared to cognitive offloading and taking shortcuts,” Grantham said.
Educators say this convergence of AI-powered personalization and a growing array of educational models marks a pivotal moment for K-12 learning. But it also brings new responsibilities.
Grantham, Lai and D’Olier all emphasized the importance of ethical AI use, strong data privacy protections and professional training.
“There’s not a school in Hawaii that isn’t actively engaged in establishing effective use policies and safety features around AI,” D’Olier said, adding that OpenAI, Google and other companies are working directly with educational institutions to develop safe, school-ready platforms.
Ultimately, Hawaii’s independent schools are betting on AI not to replace human educators, but to amplify them.
“Counter-intuitive as it may seem,” Lai said, “AI has the potential to strengthen the most human aspects of education by freeing teachers from routine tasks, allowing more time for meaningful relationships, hands-on learning and authentic community engagement.”
Education
9 AI Ethics Scenarios (and What School Librarians Would Do)
A common refrain about artificial intelligence in education is that it’s a research tool, and as such, some school librarians are acquiring firsthand experience with its uses and controversies.
Leading a presentation last week at the ISTELive 25 + ASCD annual conference in San Antonio, a trio of librarians parsed appropriate and inappropriate uses of AI in a series of hypothetical scenarios. They broadly recommended that schools have, and clearly articulate, official policies governing AI use and be cautious about inputting copyrighted or private information.
Amanda Hunt, a librarian at Oak Run Middle School in Texas, said their presentation would focus on scenarios because librarians are experiencing so many.
“The reason we did it this way is because these scenarios are coming up,” she said. “Every day I’m hearing some other type of question in regards to AI and how we’re using it in the classroom or in the library.”
- Scenario 1: A class encourages students to use generative AI for brainstorming, outlining and summarizing articles.
Elissa Malespina, a teacher librarian at Science Park High School in New Jersey, said she felt this was a valid use, as she has found AI to be helpful for high schoolers who are prone to get overwhelmed by research projects.
Ashley Cooksey, an assistant professor and school library program director at Arkansas Tech University, disagreed slightly: While she appreciates AI’s ability to outline and brainstorm, she said, she would discourage her students from using it to synthesize summaries.
“Point one on that is that you’re not using your synthesis and digging deep and reading the article for yourself to pull out the information pertinent to you,” she said. “Point No. 2 — I publish, I write. If you’re in higher ed, you do that. I don’t want someone to put my work into a piece of generative AI and an [LLM] that is then going to use work I worked very, very hard on to train its language learning model.”
- Scenario 2: A school district buys an AI tool that generates student book reviews for a library website, which saves time and promotes titles but misses key themes or introduces unintended bias.
All three speakers said this use of AI could certainly be helpful to librarians, but if the reviews are labeled in a way that makes it sound like they were written by students when they weren’t, that wouldn’t be ethical.
- Scenario 3: An administrator asks a librarian to use AI to generate new curriculum materials and library signage. Do the outputs violate copyright or proper attribution rules?
Hunt said the answer depends on local and district regulations, but she recommended using Adobe Express because it doesn’t pull from the Internet.
- Scenario 4: An ed-tech vendor pitches a school library on an AI tool that analyzes circulation data and automatically recommends titles to purchase. It learns from the school’s preferences but often excludes lesser-known topics or authors of certain backgrounds.
Hunt, Malespina and Cooksey agreed that this would be problematic, especially because entering circulation data could include personally identifiable information, which should never be entered into an AI.
- Scenario 5: At a school that doesn’t have a clear AI policy, a student uses AI to summarize a research article and gets accused of plagiarism. Who is responsible, and what is the librarian’s role?
The speakers as well as polled audience members tended to agree the school district would be responsible in this scenario. Without a policy in place, the school will have a harder time establishing whether a student’s behavior constitutes plagiarism.
Cooksey emphasized the need for ongoing professional development, and Hunt said any districts that don’t have an official AI policy need steady pressure until they draft one.
“I am the squeaky wheel right now in my district, and I’m going to continue to be annoying about it, but I feel like we need to have something in place,” Hunt said.
- Scenario 6: Attempting to cause trouble, a student creates a deepfake of a teacher acting inappropriately. Administrators struggle to respond, they have no specific policy in place, and trust is shaken.
Again, the speakers said this is one more example to illustrate the importance of AI policies as well as AI literacy.
“We’re getting to this point where we need to be questioning so much of what we see, hear and read,” Hunt said.
- Scenario 7: A pilot program uses AI to provide instant feedback on student essays, but English language learners consistently get lower scores, leading teachers to worry the AI system can’t recognize code-switching or cultural context.
In response to this situation, Hunt said it’s important to know whether the parent has given their permission to enter student essays into an AI, and the teacher or librarian should still be reading the essays themselves.
Malespina and Cooksey both cautioned against relying on AI plagiarism detection tools.
“None of these tools can do a good enough job, and they are biased toward [English language learners],” Malespina said.
- Scenario 8: A school-approved AI system flags students who haven’t checked out any books recently, tracks their reading speed and completion patterns, and recommends interventions.
Malespina said she doesn’t want an AI tool tracking students in that much detail, and Cooksey pointed out that reading speed and completion patterns aren’t reliably indicative of anything that teachers need to know about students.
- Scenario 9: An AI tool translates texts, reads books aloud and simplifies complex texts for students with individualized education programs, but it doesn’t always translate nuance or tone.
Hunt said she sees benefit in this kind of application for students who need extra support, but she said the loss of tone could be an issue, and it raises questions about infringing on audiobook copyright laws.
Cooksey expounded upon that.
“Additionally, copyright goes beyond the printed work. … That copyright owner also owns the presentation rights, the audio rights and anything like that,” she said. “So if they’re putting something into a generative AI tool that reads the PDF, that is technically a violation of copyright in that moment, because there are available tools for audio versions of books for this reason, and they’re widely available. Sora is great, and it’s free for educators. … But when you’re talking about taking something that belongs to someone else and generating a brand-new copied product of that, that’s not fair use.”
Education
Bret Harte Superintendent Named To State Boards On School Finance And AI
Education
Blunkett urges ministers to use ‘incredible sensitivity’ in changing Send system in England | Special educational needs
Ministers must use “incredible sensitivity” in making changes to the special educational needs system, former education secretary David Blunkett has said, as the government is urged not to drop education, health and care plans (EHCPs).
Lord Blunkett, who went through the special needs system when attending a residential school for blind children, said ministers would have to tread carefully.
The former home secretary in Tony Blair’s government also urged the government to reassure parents that it was looking for “a meaningful replacement” for EHCPs, which guarantee more than 600,000 children and young people individual support in learning.
Blunkett said he sympathised with the challenge facing Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, saying: “It’s absolutely clear that the government will need to do this with incredible sensitivity and with a recognition it’s going to be a bumpy road.”
He said government proposals due in the autumn to reexamine Send provision in England were not the same as welfare changes, largely abandoned last week, which were aimed at reducing spending. “They put another billion in [to Send provision] and nobody noticed,” Blunkett said, adding: “We’ve got to reduce the fear of change.”
Earlier Helen Hayes, the Labour MP who chairs the cross-party Commons education select committee, called for Downing Street to commit to EHCPs, saying this was the only way to combat mistrust among many families with Send children.
“I think at this stage that would be the right thing to do,” she told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. “We have been looking, as the education select committee, at the Send system for the last several months. We have heard extensive evidence from parents, from organisations that represent parents, from professionals and from others who are deeply involved in the system, which is failing so many children and families at the moment.
“One of the consequences of that failure is that parents really have so little trust and confidence in the Send system at the moment. And the government should take that very seriously as it charts a way forward for reform.”
A letter to the Guardian on Monday, signed by dozens of special needs and disability charities and campaigners, warned against government changes to the Send system that would restrict or abolish EHCPs.
Labour MPs who spoke to the Guardian are worried ministers are unable to explain essential details of the special educational needs shake-up being considered in the schools white paper to be published in October.
Downing Street has refused to rule out ending EHCPs, while stressing that no decisions have yet been taken ahead of a white paper on Send provision to be published in October.
Keir Starmer’s deputy spokesperson said: “I’ll just go back to the broader point that the system is not working and is in desperate need of reform. That’s why we want to actively work with parents, families, parliamentarians to make sure we get this right.”
after newsletter promotion
Speaking later in the Commons, Phillipson said there was “no responsibility I take more seriously” than that to more vulnerable children. She said it was a “serious and complex area” that “we as a government are determined to get right”.
The education secretary said: “There will always be a legal right to the additional support children with Send need, and we will protect it. But alongside that, there will be a better system with strengthened support, improved access and more funding.”
Dr Will Shield, an educational psychologist from the University of Exeter, said rumoured proposals that limit EHCPs – potentially to pupils in special schools – were “deeply problematic”.
Shield said: “Mainstream schools frequently rely on EHCPs to access the funding and oversight needed to support children effectively. Without a clear, well-resourced alternative, families will fear their children are not able to access the support they need to achieve and thrive.”
Paul Whiteman, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said: “Any reforms in this space will likely provoke strong reactions and it will be crucial that the government works closely with both parents and schools every step of the way.”
-
Funding & Business1 week ago
Kayak and Expedia race to build AI travel agents that turn social posts into itineraries
-
Jobs & Careers7 days ago
Mumbai-based Perplexity Alternative Has 60k+ Users Without Funding
-
Mergers & Acquisitions7 days ago
Donald Trump suggests US government review subsidies to Elon Musk’s companies
-
Funding & Business7 days ago
Rethinking Venture Capital’s Talent Pipeline
-
Jobs & Careers6 days ago
Why Agentic AI Isn’t Pure Hype (And What Skeptics Aren’t Seeing Yet)
-
Funding & Business4 days ago
Sakana AI’s TreeQuest: Deploy multi-model teams that outperform individual LLMs by 30%
-
Funding & Business1 week ago
From chatbots to collaborators: How AI agents are reshaping enterprise work
-
Jobs & Careers7 days ago
Astrophel Aerospace Raises ₹6.84 Crore to Build Reusable Launch Vehicle
-
Jobs & Careers7 days ago
Telangana Launches TGDeX—India’s First State‑Led AI Public Infrastructure
-
Funding & Business7 days ago
Europe’s Most Ambitious Startups Aren’t Becoming Global; They’re Starting That Way