Connect with us

Top Stories

Is the dollar’s drop a sign of America’s financial decline? : NPR

Published

on


The dollar has slumped more than 10% against other major currencies, marking its worst first-half a year since 1973.

Daniel Munoz/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Daniel Munoz/AFP via Getty Images

There’s perhaps no better symbolic representation of America’s financial might than the U.S. dollar. And right now, the world’s top currency is taking a big, mighty punch.

The dollar has slumped more than 10% this year, posting its worst decline in the first six months of a year since 1973, back when President Nixon shocked the world by detaching the dollar’s value from gold.

The decline reverses a long stretch of annual gains for the dollar — and it’s especially confounding given that the U.S. economy is still doing well.

“America was already great,” says Kaspar Hense, a senior portfolio manager at RBC BlueBay Asset Management.

“We are coming from a very strong dollar level where U.S. exceptionalism was what everybody was speaking about in financial markets,” he adds.

Many investors now fear the decline could reflect a new reality for the U.S., just after the country celebrated its 249th birthday.

A series of chaotic policies and statements by Trump — from tariffs to attacking the Federal Reserve — has shaken some of the confidence investors around the world had long held in the U.S.

But it goes beyond that. The country’s debt is ballooning — and will grow even more with the GOP megabill that was passed by Congress last week. Meanwhile, there are real concerns about what the deep political divisions will mean for the U.S.

The big question now is: Does this re-assessment reflect a long-term shift or just a momentary blip?

The case against the American dollar

Whether one agrees or disagrees with President Trump, one thing is clear: His second term is shaping up to be quite different — and it’s unnerving many investors, both in the U.S. and abroad.

The chaotic rollout of tariffs has led to widespread uncertainty across businesses in the U.S. and around the world.

But President Trump has also disregarded other norms. He’s picked a fight with the Federal Reserve and Chair Jerome Powell over interest rates, for example, upending a tradition upheld by most American presidents not to interfere with the independence of the central bank.

And at a time when there are already serious concerns about the country’s finances President Trump on Independence Day signed a massive bill passed by Congress last week that will rack up trillions of dollars in additional debt.

Of course, the U.S. debt load has been rising significantly for years ever since President Clinton and Congress managed to balance the budget in the 1990s.

Kenneth Rogoff, a former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, and now a professor at Harvard, says those years of inaction to deal with the rising debt levels are contributing to the dollar’s decline.

“How much do investors want to be overweight in dollars when they can sort of see this slow-motion train wreck coming?,” he asks. “While I wouldn’t read too much into the dollar’s fall this year, there is no question that there is this broader underlying trend of moving away from the dollar — and Trump’s been an accelerant.”

President Trump, joined by Republican lawmakers, signs the "One, Big Beautiful Bill Act," a massive spending and tax bill, at the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C. on July 4, 2025.

President Trump, joined by Republican lawmakers, signs the “One, Big Beautiful Bill Act,” a massive spending and tax bill, at the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C. on July 4, 2025.

Samuel Corum/Getty Images North America


hide caption

toggle caption

Samuel Corum/Getty Images North America

Foreign investors have indeed responded — by selling American stocks and bonds, which has pushed the dollar sharply lower. That’s because when a foreign investors dump shares in a company for example, they then effectively sell the dollar and convert it back to their home currency.

A widely followed survey by Bank of America of fund managers around the world reflects this selling quite starkly. Fund managers had preferred U.S. stocks over international stocks for most of the past two decades — but that’s changed this year.

But the latest survey out in mid-June showed a startling statistic: Only 23% now preferred U.S. stocks.

That’s amply reflected in how stocks around the world have performed this year.

Yes, the S&P has just hit record highs, recovering from steep losses earlier this year, helped by a good performance in sectors like technology. But consider this: Even with the most recent gains the S&P 500 — representing the biggest 500 companies in the U.S. — is up more than 6% this year.

However, that compares to both Germany’s DAX index and Hong Kon’s Hang Seng Index, which are up nearly 20% this year as of the end of last week. Several other international stock markets have also gained significantly.

The case for the American dollar

Not everybody is convinced that the dollar’s decline is an alarming trend.

Under this thinking, the U.S. has gotten used to outperforming global markets for years, so a months-long reversal is not necessarily catastrophic. It’s just a re-adjustment that had been coming.

And then there’s a long-held market adage: TINA, as in, There Is No Alternative.

The dollar is by far the most widely-held currency in the world, used by everybody from governments to multinational companies to drug cartels.

And there’s no bigger and more diverse market than the U.S., whether it be stocks or government bonds.

A trader works in front of a board displaying the chart of Germany's DAX index at the stock exchange in Frankfurt, Germany, on April 7, 2025. German stocks have surged this year, outpacing gains in the U.S.

A trader works in front of a board displaying the chart of Germany’s DAX index at the stock exchange in Frankfurt, Germany, on April 7, 2025. German stocks have surged this year, outpacing gains in the U.S.

Daniel Roland/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Daniel Roland/AFP via Getty Images

There are also benefits to a weaker dollar.

Yes, a weaker dollar makes it more expensive for Americans to travel abroad, but it’s good domestic tourism, while exporters like Apple, which earns a substantial portion of its revenue from countries abroad.

And American companies that have long faced cheaper imports would get a bit of a boost. The weaker dollar would make foreign products a little more expensive — even more so when tariffs kick in — giving domestic manufacturers a major leg up.

“There’s a temptation for a lot of people to think of the strength of your currency as some sort of national virility symbol,” says Kit Juckes, the Chief FX Strategist at Societe Generale. “It really isn’t.”

“You shouldn’t expect to have a super, super, super strong currency forever,” Juckes adds, citing the impact on workers in sectors such as manufacturing or agriculture that become less competitive when the dollar is strong.

Currencies like the euro or yuan could challenge the dollar’ dominance

So then, what’s next for the dollar? That, as it turns out, is the trillion-dollar question

Despite the dollar’s steep decline this year, few analysts are willing to make sweeping judgements about what it symbolizes for the U.S. At least, not yet.

But the concerns remain about whether the dollar’s decline is a reflection of a long-term reassessment of the U.S. financial standing in the world — and a sign that the overwhelming dominance of the dollar might be coming to an end.

Rogoff, who recently authored the book “Our Dollar, Your Problem,” says the U.S. has long depended on foreign investments as a critical source of capital, investments that have helped make the dollar the world’s reserve currency.

But as the U.S. faces entrenched problems like surging debt levels, perceptions about the U.S. could change.

“The dollar franchise isn’t gone, but it’s weakening materially,” he says.

Rogoff believes that over the next 10-20 years the world will see “a more tri-polar system” as the euro, the Chinese yuan, and even crypto currencies, emerge to challenge the dollar’s dominance.

“The dollar’s reserve currency status has been fraying at the edges for at least a decade,” Rogoff says. “And the process is accelerating under Trump.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top Stories

Trump says he’ll send new weapons to Ukraine

Published

on




CNN
 — 

President Donald Trump said Monday he plans to send additional defensive weapons to Ukraine after his administration paused certain shipments last week.

“We’re going to send some more weapons. We have to – they have to be able to defend themselves,” Trump said ahead of a dinner with his Israeli counterpart, Benjamin Netanyahu.

“They’re getting hit very hard. We’re going to have to send more weapons,” Trump added. “Defensive weapons, primarily, but they’re getting hit very, very hard.”

The president’s latest remarks come after a senior White House official told CNN last week the Trump administration was pausing some weapons shipments to Ukraine, including air defense missiles. The decision came after a review of military spending and American support to foreign countries that was signed off by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.

White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said at the time that the decision was made “to put America’s interests first.”

Some US officials insinuated the review of aid to Ukraine was related in part to the Pentagon’s push to focus on China and be prepared for potential future conflict in the Pacific – an issue prioritized by the Pentagon’s policy chief, Elbridge Colby.

“The Department of Defense continues to provide the President with robust options to continue military aid to Ukraine, consistent with his goal of bringing this tragic war to an end. At the same time, the Department is rigorously examining and adapting its approach to achieving this objective while also preserving US forces’ readiness for Administration defense priorities,” Colby said in a statement at the time of the pause.

Russia welcomed the halt in certain shipments to Ukraine, claiming – without providing any evidence – it was made because the US did not have enough weapons.

“At President Trump’s direction, the Department of Defense will send additional defensive weapons to Ukraine to ensure the Ukrainians can defend themselves while we work to secure a lasting peace,” chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement Monday. “Our framework for POTUS to evaluate military shipments across the globe remains in effect and is integral to our America First defense priorities.”

The US has been the biggest single donor of military aid to Ukraine since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022, supplying Ukraine with air defense systems, drones, rocket launchers, radars, tanks and anti-armor weapons, leading to concerns over dwindling US stockpiles.

Trump previously halted all shipments of military aid to Ukraine in March following a heated Oval Office argument with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump resumed aid flows to Ukraine about a week later.

The decision to send additional weapons also comes after Trump spoke separately last week with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Zelensky. He said afterward his talk with Putin was disappointing and there was “no progress” towards a ceasefire.

Meanwhile, Zelensky in recent weeks has been pleading with Western allies to bolster his nation’s aerial defenses after intensifying Russian airborne attacks. Russia launched a record number of drones at Ukraine overnight on Friday, just hours after the Trump-Putin phone call.

Trump later Friday said the US was considering Ukraine’s request for more Patriot defense systems after a “very good” phone call with Zelensky. The Ukrainian president said on Saturday that latest conversation with Trump was the best and “most productive” he has had.

Trump on Monday reaffirmed his displeasure with the Russian leader, saying: “I’m not happy with President Putin at all.”

This story has been updated with additional information.

CNN’s Kaanita Iyer contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

Passengers at some U.S. airports no longer have to remove footwear, sources say

Published

on


Passengers at some airports across the U.S. no longer have to remove their shoes during regular preflight security checks, two sources familiar with the change confirmed to CBS News on Monday.

The change appears to be a phased approach, sources said, and the first airports where the no-shoes requirement is expiring include: Baltimore/Washington International Airport, Fort Lauderdale International Airport, Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport, Portland International Airport, Philadelphia International Airport and Piedmont Triad International Airport in North Carolina.

However, CBS News correspondents at Los Angeles International Airport and New York City’s LaGuardia Airport reported Monday night that they and other passengers didn’t have to take off their shoes.

Travelers with TSA PreCheck already didn’t have to remove their footwear. In order to have PreCheck, travelers must submit an application and go through a clearance process with the TSA.

The change comes amid reports that the Transportation Security Administration has let the security rule expire for fliers going through the standard TSA screening lines.

In a statement to CBS News on Monday, TSA said the agency and the Department of Homeland Security “are always exploring new and innovative ways to enhance the passenger experience and our strong security posture.”

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

and

contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

Judge temporarily blocks Trump administration from enforcing funding ban against Planned Parenthood

Published

on




CNN
 — 

A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a provision of President Donald Trump’s sweeping domestic policy law to defund Planned Parenthood’s health care services.

The order from US District Judge Indira Talwani, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, blocks the provision’s enforcement for 14 days. The measure would bar Medicaid users from coverage with a health care provider that also provides abortion services.

The Planned Parenthood Federation of America – along with Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts and Planned Parenthood Association of Utah – sued the administration earlier Monday, arguing that the funding ban would have devastating consequences across the country.

While the legislation, which Trump signed on Friday, does not explicitly mention Planned Parenthood, the nationwide family planning and health care provider is in its crosshairs. The law prohibits federal funding for providers “primarily engaged in family planning services, reproductive health, and related medical care” that also provide abortion.

Planned Parenthood has warned that nearly 200 clinics nationwide – which also provide birth control, STI testing and treatment, and cancer screening – could close as a result of the bill’s one-year ban on funds.

Ninety percent of those clinics, Planned Parenthood says, are in states where abortion is legal.

“This case is about making sure that patients who use Medicaid as their insurance to get birth control, cancer screenings, and STI testing and treatment can continue to do so at their local Planned Parenthood health center, and we will make that clear in court,” Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement.

The bill originally barred funds for ten years, before the Senate Parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, reduced the measure to one year.

The Planned Parenthood Federation of America and the two local networks celebrated Monday’s order, while warning in a statement of the consequences if the provision is ultimately allowed to take effect.

“Already, in states across the country, providers and health center staff have been forced to turn away patients who use Medicaid to get basic sexual and reproductive health care because President Trump and his backers in Congress passed a law to block them from going to Planned Parenthood,” the groups said. “There are no other providers who can fill the gap if the ‘defunding’ of Planned Parenthood is allowed to stand.”

CNN has reached out to the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for comment.

Earlier Monday, anti-abortion advocates quickly railed against Planned Parenthood’s suit.

“Planned Parenthood’s desperation is showing as they run to the courts again to fix a crisis of their own making,” said Susan B. Anthony’s Pro-Life America director of legal affairs and policy counsel Katie Daniel.

Planned Parenthood is also battling the Trump administration in court over cuts to a federal teen pregnancy prevention program. Lawyers for five Planned Parenthood networks argued in a federal District of Columbia court this June that administration’s changes to the program, including limits on language around diversity and equity, were vague and could bar Planned Parenthood from providing longtime services.

This story and headline have been updated with additional developments.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending